Liar: Trump to Keep US in Syria War Despite Promises

After a contradiction from the US special envoy to the US-led coalition, Trump has vowed to keep the country's troops in Syria "a little longer," but still wants the withdrawal relatively soon.


A senior administration official told NBC News Trump made the decision during a meeting on Tuesday but, “He wasn’t thrilled about it, to say the least.”

“The president made his displeasure clear about any kind of long-term presence in Syria,” the official stated.

Trump came to the decision after Defense Secretary James Mattis and other top officials explained that a complete withdrawal of US troops now would risk all the gains already made against the Islamic State, the media report said.

“We’re not going to immediately withdraw but neither is the president willing to back a long-term commitment,” a senior US administration official said.

The president, however, hasn’t approved any specific withdrawal timetable, the official noted. According to him, while Trump wants to ensure that the Daesh terror group is defeated, he also wants other regional countries, as well as the United Nations, to step up and help provide stability in Syria.

The March 3 statement by US President Donald Trump, vowing to pull out the country’s troops from Syria in the near term, was met with a contradictory reaction from Trump’s special envoy to the US-led coalition, Brett McGurk. The official responded that the coalition’s mission in Syria was not over and the US would stay in the country until the terrorist group is defeated.

READ MORE: Trump: I Want to Bring Troops Back From Syria, Have ‘Great Dialogue’ With Russia

Trump’s decision surprised his administration, including senior Pentagon and State Department officials, who previously insisted that American troops would maintain an open-ended presence in Syria.

This Saturday, April. 29, 2017 still taken from video, shows an American soldier standing on an armored vehicle in the northern village of Darbasiyah, Syria
AP Photo/ APTV
This Saturday, April. 29, 2017 still taken from video, shows an American soldier standing on an armored vehicle in the northern village of Darbasiyah, Syria

However, following the president’s move, they promised changes as well: Dan Coats, the director of US National Intelligence, announced Wednesday that the presidential administration had made a decision on the issue, vowing to release a statement on US involvement in Syria.

US troops have maintained a military presence in Syria since 2014, leading a coalition of allies in the fight against Daesh, without a UN mandate or an authorization from the Syrian government. Damascus has consistently called the US military presence in the country “illegal.”

READ MORE: US Mulled Sending More Troops to Syria Before Trump’s Call to Leave — Reports

*Daesh, also known as ISIL/ISIS/IS, is a terrorist group banned in Russia and many other countries

Results of Russian Air Campaign and US-led Coalition Intervention in Syria


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.


  1. Who is writing the script for these war mongers. Some years bag when the USA attacked Iraq baby Bush said……….”Are you with us? or are you against us” . In today`s Sun newspaper Teresa May has said……………”Back me,or back brutality” .Even though its said this comment was directed to MP`s it is also directed at the British public because she knows the majority of people are against attacking Syria. Just like baby Bush`s comment its designed to make us feel guilty. The whole set up is pure propaganda, I believe the west orchestrated fake gas attack. I wonder why every president or prime minster has to have their fingers in a dirty war.

Comments are closed.