Sandy Hook: Fetzer and Halbig on the False Flag Controversy


SPECIAL NOTE: VT does NOT endorse Sandy Hook deniers.  VT believes in the First Amendment and academic freedom.  It is an open forum for all points of view thus VT offers others a platform to tell their stories, points of view, and opinions.

To insure a well informed educated online citizen, we ask all readers to double and triple fact check all information herein. VT empathizes and stands with the victims of Sandy Hook and their families.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.


  1. Since there are three basic types of false flag events: only fake victims, a mixture of fake and real victims, and only real victims, the truth of Sandy Hook beyond the official story containing many lies is not obvious.

  2. False Flag November 22, 1963
    Israel’s determination to attain the “Bomb” was rightly suspected & of course strongly opposed by JFK. but all this was kept secret by the MSM & general US public both before & after the assassination.
    This was “of course” down to “National Security” so strictly maintained by all involved that Ethan Bronner, in the New York Times, called Israel’s drive to build a nuclear bomb “a fiercely hidden subject.”
    Finally JFK threatned to withdraw all US economic aid unless Israel allows US inspection of “Dimona” in a a letter to Ben Gurion.
    Immediately Ben Gurion resigned in disgust & before receipt of the letter saying that because of JFK’s policies, Israel’s “existence [was] in danger” & by so doing gained valuable time in “negociations”.
    Then upon JFK’s assassination, BINGO U.S. policy toward Israel began an immediate 180-degree turnaround.
    Maverick Israeli journalist Barry Chamish acknowledges that there exists “a pretty cogent case” for Mossad collaboration with the CIA in the assassination conspiracy.
    BTW — In July 2004 the Israeli whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu claimed in the London-based Al-Hayat newspaper that the State of Israel was complicit in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He claimed there were “near-certain indications” that Kennedy was assassinated in response to “pressure he exerted on Israel’s then head of government, David Ben-Gurion, to shed light on Dimona’s nuclear reactor”

  3. Does Gordon Duff posting this indicate that he has newer information that has revised his opinion of the work of Fetzer and Halbig regarding Sandy Hook? And why no Editor’s Note to enlighten us?

  4. We all know who Jim Fetzer is, but it was great to hear Wolfgang Halbigs comments re Sandy Hook.
    Something smells on the end of that hook.

Comments are closed.