Virginia Roberts Giuffre puts Prince Andrew’s ass in a frying pan

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s testimony is far more plausive than Prince Andrew’s perpetual lies. Prince Andrew has good reason to be scared.

By
Jonas E. Alexis, Senior Editor
-
6
4207

…by Jonas E. Alexis

Prince Andrew would be better off telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about his exploration—sexual exploration. In doing this, he would indeed help himself because perpetuating one categorical lie after another during interviews and TV appearances is drawing him closer to his own moral destruction.

For example, we know that Prince Andrew has been working his sex experiments out for years. We know that he has been with Jeffrey Epstein. And we know that he is a pathological liar. How?

Well, Prince Andrew was forthrightly and categorically denying a picture that he took with Virginia Roberts Giuffre! How dumb can it get?

This is Prince Andrew at his best: “I have no recollection of that photograph ever having been taken.”[1] So what? You mean to tell us all that it is not you in the picture? And if it isn’t, then who is it? Your twin brother? A close relative?



Well, Prince Andrew does not have a twin brother. What, then, his “logical” defense? Here it is:

“‘It’s a photograph of a photograph of a photograph,’ Andrew huffed in his interview with BBC journalist Emily Maitlis — and therefore impossible to confirm as a fake, he said. ‘Nobody can prove whether or not that photograph has been doctored,’ he said. But it can’t be real, he reasoned, because ‘as a member of the royal family’ he’s not big on hugging, he said.’ ‘I’m terribly sorry, but if I, as a member of the royal family, and I have a photograph taken — and I take very, very few photographs — I  am not one to, um, as it were, hug,’ he averred.”[2]

“Prince Andrew should go to jail,” said Roberts last month.[3] Andrew is obviously standing on a shaky ground because he has zero evidence to back up his claim. Roberts, on the contrary, has pictures and other circumstantial evidence. Holding up the picture that she took with Andrew back in 2001, Roberts declared:

“This is a real photo. That is Andrew. “It’s been since given to the FBI and they’ve never contested that it’s a fake. “Only one of us is telling the truth. And it will come out”[4]

If you ask me, Andrew is obviously swimming in a swamp of dodo. Roberts moved on to say that Epstein forced her to have sex with “the elite of the world.” She said:

“I was trafficked to other billionaires. I was trafficked to other politicians. They should be named and they should be shamed. What they’ve done is horrific. There wasn’t a part of my body that they did not abuse. “I would be trafficked to somebody who physically and sexually abuses you, to the point you don’t think you’re going to live…Being a kid, I didn’t realize what world I was being brought into.”[5]

So far, Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s testimony is far more plausive than Prince Andrew’s perpetual lies. Prince Andrew has good reason to be scared. Virginia Roberts Giuffre also would do well to start naming names. We know Alan Dershowitz seemed to have had a piece of the sexual pie as well.

  • [1] Laura Italiano, “Prince Andrew doubts photo with Epstein sex slave is real because he doesn’t hug,” NY Post, November 17, 2019.
  • [2] Ibid.
  • [3] Lee Brown, “Virginia Roberts Giuffre says Prince Andrew ‘should go to jail’ over Jeffrey Epstein scandal,” NY Post, November 6, 2019.
  • [4] Ibid.
  • [5] Ibid.

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

6 COMMENTS

  1. Andrew is a diversion from the real corruption, and the Elite will keep the diversion going as long as possible thereby taking the heat off Dershowitz, Clinton and others.

    • I had to look that up, since you mentioned it.
      plausive adjective

      plau·​sive | \ ˈplȯ-ziv
      , -siv\
      Definition of plausive

      1 : manifesting praise or approval
      2 obsolete : pleasing
      3 archaic : specious
      First Known Use of plausive

      1598, in the meaning defined at sense 1

      I always enjoy having something defined and learning something new. It is very plausive.
      The subject of Epstein is not.

  3. “Virginia Roberts Affidavit” ~ teen diary of Randy Prince Andy and DirtBag0witz at Jeffrey’s Kiddie Whorehouse of Horrors, photos and extensive timeline of elite crimes. JizzLane MaxHell did not kill herself, MADAM and pimp is still at large.

  4. And the Israelis continue their genocide of Palestine, unreported by The City of Londons world wide media.

Comments are closed.