by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

October 4, 2012

ADL TO ATTACK JOURNALISTS AND PUBLICATIONS TYING ISRAEL TO WIKILEAKS

There is a new movement afoot. Israel needs Assange again, running to their most tired bloggers, even having Assange’s Mossad handler write “attack articles,” actually one against me. I just smile. Rehabilitating Assange and his “psyops” Islamophobic partnership with Israel and the New York Times is worth a try.

Few remember two years ago when Julian Assange admitted to allowing Israel to “filter” all Wikileaks material.  “Filter” is the understatement of all time. 

Though Israel and the Mossad didn’t create it all, they inserted enough material in Wikileaks to totally discredit except to those who only stick to the mainstream news or, in recent days, the bloggers Israel keeps on the Mossad payroll.  Below, we will make some of the cases against Wikileaks for those who were “off-planet” in 2010 and 2011.

In the BBC interview below, I explain our process for identifying Assange as an Israeli agent and what his tasks have been:

[You Tube Video No Longer Available XO45VxqjfJU]

“There is a list, the Bush administration’s “working group” that green-lighted 9/11. Of the five names on it, three are Jews. “

Last week, responding to a deluge of news reports tying Israel to Wikileaks, Julian Assange announced he finally planned to release 3700 cables from the US Embassy in Tel Aviv, documents previously withheld from the public. In a press release, Assange said he planned the “dump” in 6 months but didn’t indicate how many other documents involving Israel were being withheld.

VT has been informed by sources within the ADL that, in coordination with Julian Assange’s announcement, they were “tasked” by the Tel Aviv government to begin operations against journalists and online publications that had led to Wikileaks being discredited as an Israeli intelligence operation.

Sources indicate that Tel Aviv values Wikileaks as a vital asset in molding public opinion and providing cover for high-risk operations.

ADL’s website is loading up with warnings and attacks, all defending Wikileaks and Julian Assange and attacking news sources that print materials either critical of Julian Assange or citing Israel’s involvement in Wikileak’s agreement to allow material critical of Israel to be censored.

“If we had Wikileaks up to speed, the Goldstone Report would never have been heard of at all. There isn’t anything that can’t be covered up by a Julian Assange scandal. I just hope something doesn’t come up where it gets so serious that Assange will have to be assassinated. He is really a loveable dupe.” (ADL source)

The ADL source cited publications www.opinion-maker.org and www.veteranstoday.com as the largest threats, followed by author Jeff Gates.

“We know we aren’t going to be able to reach their audience. Our job is to insulate our own base, America’s Jewish population, one increasingly sympathetic to progressive alternative publications. With Israel and President Obama at each other’s throats and 78% of America’s Jewish population having supported Obama in the presidential election, we could be playing with fire here.” (ADL source)

ISRAEL’S STRATEGY BACKFIRES

It isn’t a very well-kept secret that the ADL and AIPAC are agencies of Israeli intelligence. Their litany of transgressions is being dragged into the open by former AIPAC Lobbyist Steve Rosen in his defamation lawsuit against that organization. In 2004, the FBI tried to close AIPAC down for spying, only to see their criminal cases blocked by Bush administration officials.

Now, with the ADL openly going after the press for reporting ties between Julian Assange and Israel and Assange’s agreement to allow Wikileaks to be censored by both Israel and press organizations working with them, has exposed Wikileaks to even more embarrassment.

ADL’s actions to publicly defend Wikileaks are blowing up in their faces.

“I have no idea what they were thinking back in Tel Aviv. What kind of idiot would try to keep the Wikileaks and Israel thing quiet and then have the ADL run around like maniacs calling people names. The ADL should keep to spray painting swastika’s on synagogues and sending articles to “Stormfront” and leave the thinking to people better equipped if there still are people like that around….which I am not so sure of.” (ADL source)

9/11, IS THAT WHAT IS BEING HIDDEN?

With 9/11 more and more in the public eye, especially with Fox News and Jesse Ventura’s “Conspiracy Theory” building a powerful case for involvement by the Bush administration in the planning and execution of 9/11 as a “false flag” terror attack, it is likely that Israel feels particularly vulnerable. If a solid tie between Israel and 9/11 is made, Israel will have its first real security problem since 1973.

“I never knew Assange was working for us, not even when he started attacking the 9/11 Truth movement. I really didn’t know for sure until a couple of days ago. As for 9/11, that’s something else. There are a couple of senior guys running around, saying they planned 9/11, not Mossad, military guys. I don’t know if they are bullshitters or not. They say it like this…’Of course, we did it, who else? We don’t care, say whatever you want, who needs to hide anything, we can do whatever we want there.’

This is how they put it. I just don’t know why they are saying this or why they are saying it now. What I do know is that this Wikileaks thing, somehow 9/11 may be behind it.

There is a list, the Bush administration’s “working group” that green-lighted 9/11. Of the five names on it, three are Jews. ” (ADL Source)

IS FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR, BRZEZINSKI “NOT” TALKING ABOUT ISRAEL?

This week, Judy Woodruff of PBS interviewed Zbigniew Brzezinski and Stephen Hadley, former national security advisers for presidents Carter and Bush. The subject of the interview was Wikileaks.

Such interviews seldom reveal much, though Brzezinski is one of the most controversial figures of our times, tied to endless conspiracies and rumored to head many of the secret societies tasked with maintaining the New World Order.

The interview is available in full at PBS. For the most part, Hadley offers little or nothing of substance, much as when he served as national security adviser to President George W. Bush. Brzezinski, however, is another beast entirely.

The interview is edited, with little exception, like a monologue by Brzezinski.

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But I think the most serious issues are not those which are getting the headlines right now. Who cares if Berlusconi is described as a clown. Most Italians agree with that. Who cares if Putin is described as an alpha dog? He probably is flattered by it.

The real issue is, who is feeding Wikipedia on this issue — Wiki — Wiki — WikiLeaks on this issue? They’re getting a lot of information that seems trivial, inconsequential, but some of it seems surprisingly pointed. …The very pointed references to Arab leaders could have as their objective undermining their political credibility at home because this kind of public identification of their hostility towards Iran could actually play against them at home.

[ Editor’s note: The use of the term, “pointed” is key. This indicates two classes of information and also begins building a hypothesis to support “intent.” If there is “intent” in the leaks, then they are an intelligence operation, not a leak. ]

It’s, rather, a question of whether WikiLeaks are being manipulated by interested parties that want to either complicate our relationship with other governments or want to undermine some governments because some of these items that are being emphasized and have surfaced are very pointed.

And I wonder whether, in fact, there aren’t some operations internationally, intelligence services, that are feeding stuff to WikiLeaks, because it is a unique opportunity to embarrass us, to embarrass our position, but also to undermine our relations with particular governments.

[ Editor’s note: Brzezinski goes exactly there, indicating his belief that Wikileaks is tied to an intelligence agency. This is a full and direct challenge to the credibility of WikiLeaks showing no reservations whatsoever. ]

For example, leaving aside the personal gossip about Sarkozy or Berlusconi or Putin, the business about the Turks is clearly calculated in terms of its potential impact on disrupting the American-Turkish relationship….the top leaders, Erdogan and Davutoglu and so forth, are using some really, really, very sharp language.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But this is 250 — it’s a quarter-of-a-million documents.

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: Precisely.

JUDY WOODRUFF: How easy would it be to seed this to make sure that it was slanted a certain way?

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: Seeding — seeding it is very easy. I have no doubt that WikiLeaks is getting a lot of the stuff from sort of relatively unimportant sources, like the one that perhaps is identified on the air. But it may be getting stuff at the same time from interested intelligence parties who want to manipulate the process and achieve certain very specific objectives.

[ Editor’s note: Brzezinski’s assertion is that “chicken feed,” things of the news, low level “junk” intel is being “seeded” by an intelligence service to serve an agenda with “very specific objectives.” Can anything be more clear? ]

STEPHEN HADLEY: The — what we know or what has been said publicly is it looks like a data dump through a pretty junior-level person. So, in terms of that material, it looks like a data dump. Generally, in Washington, I have had the rule that, if there are two explanations, one is a conspiracy and one is incompetence, you ought to go with incompetence. You will be right 90 percent of the time.

[ Editor’s note: The Obama administration withdrew the AIPAC spying convictions when it was clear that Stephen Hadley would be put on the stand by the defense. Hadley’s very close relationship with the defendants in this spy trial brings up a number of interesting questions which are not hard to answer if you read his response above. ]

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But, Steve, the other foreign intelligence services don’t have to wait for me to make that suggestion. I think they can think of it themselves, particularly after the first instance.

WHAT DOES ALL OF THIS MEAN?

Brzezinski is, by a mile, the tough guy in Washington, the best informed and the last person anyone wants to cross. There is little question of this. Whatever is said, he is also someone who always knows what is going on and, through careful with his words, simply doesn’t bother kissing up to special interest in a humiliating way like some others.

There are many ways this interview can be read but only one meaning can be gotten from what was clearly said. Brzezinski, based on his analysis, is absolutely certain that Wikileaks is an intelligence operation and not, in any way, what it is said to be in the press.

PBS and Judy Woodruff carefully avoided any speculation about Israel but any examination of this set of documents and earlier “leaks,” if we can call them that, and we really can’t, leave little doubt about which country and which intelligence organization he is referring to.

Wikileaks, Watch, Learn But Never Believe!

by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

It’s almost like a Sherlock Holmes story. We are seeing it start now. My first sign, that a mixed intelligence, disinformation campaign, or worse was in the works was last week.

A writer, former Israeli, a close friend of, coincidentally as we will see, Julian Assange, wrote an article exposing the 1973 War in the Middle East as a plot by Henry Kissinger, then-Secretary of State for Nixon, Anwar Sadat of Egypt, and Sharon of Israel.

This is the current policy of Israel. The odd point of this, theoretically at least, is that our author, who others can name, makes his living as an “anti-zionist” and critic of Israel.

What I see him as is Julian Assange’s Mossad “handler” and someone “tasked” with making Syria seem like a victim.

This is meant to help cement the bonds between Syria and Israel and to help them form a united front against Turkey. I wish them good luck with that, they will need it.

Let’s take a second to talk about Wikileaks in light of the upcoming STRATFOR email release. Nothing is as it seems, as most of us know now.

Back in the late summer of 2010, VT began to discover a pattern in Wikileaks material. Hidden among the “leaks” were purposefully created fantasies aimed at Iran and Pakistan, clumsy and obvious material that had no other source than an intelligence agency, in this case, Israel’s Mossad.

By December, Zbigniew Brzezinski had come into agreement with our assessment, stating clearly that Wikileaks was a “false flag” intelligence operation.

From then on, Wikileaks became a fiasco, especially when it was revealed that Israel and the New York Times were picking out the “leaks” themselves, all carefully orchestrated to misinform and mislead, a “Wikileaks” based on lies and censorship, not press freedom.

Wikileaks was exposed as a fraud, having to wait for things to die down so that the Mossad could make use of them again.

That time is now, in the “hack,” against STRATFOR, the competitor to Israel’s DEBKA.

STRATFOR, run by George Friedman, supplies corporate intelligence to paying customers. Some of it is excellent, much of it less detailed than the free material at VT. Friedman, however, is a respected intelligence analyst without private agenda or hidden allegiances.

DEBKA is a fantasy front for the Mossad, passing off wild rumors and conspiracy theories, all about plots against Israel or how bad Palestinians and almost everyone else is. They are a joke, albeit a profitable one.

What could be better, getting to lie, misinforming your friends and enemies, and making them pay for being led. Sounds like “War Through Deception,” pure Mossad.

Now we hear that Julian Assange, under continual police guard, running Wikileaks, an organization that really doesn’t exist anymore since being exposed as warmongering spies for Israel, has hacked into STRATFOR’s computers, stealing the emails which it plans to release.

What seems to be much more true is that Wikileaks is trying to find a “dodge” to distance itself from its own crimes. In the intelligence business, STRATFOR, compared to VT, is pretty mild stuff. In Truthout, more “mild stuff” is an article, clearly, a plant, building a case for imaginary persecution of Assange and his ultra-powerful NWO buddies:

It added that the organization was analyzing the documents with the help of 25 publications around the world, including Rolling Stone in the United States, L’Espresso in Italy, and The Hindu in India. WikiLeaks said that Stratfor kept many records on the group and its founder, Julian Assange, who is under house arrest in Britain and wanted for extradition to Sweden in connection with allegations of sex crimes.

“The material contains privileged information about the U.S. government’s attacks against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks and Stratfor’s own attempts to subvert WikiLeaks,” the group said. “There are more than 4,000 e-mails mentioning WikiLeaks or Julian Assange.”

Wikileaks was “outed” by VT, not STRATFOR, exposed, stopped dead in its tracks, and erased, as our Iranian friends so often say, “with the sands of time.” When asked, Gordon Duff, Senior Editor of VT said of Assange:

“He thinks 9/11 is a waste of time. We don’t. Assange is no more than a Likudist sock puppet.

When media finally reported that Israel had edit, approval, and “creation rights” on all Wikileaks material, I started a clock going. The question was, one now answered, when will the Mossad try to whitewash Wikileaks. It must have cost millions, seeing an intelligence asset like Wikileaks, constantly pushing for war with Iran, continually advocating attacks on Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, quality war mongering by a “peace activist,” go to waste.

You would think they would wise up. Assange reminds people of a combination of Mussolini and someone who voted off Dancing With the Stars on the first week. Even a little bit of “Assange” is too much “Assange.” I can’t think of anyone else who would actually benefit from being accused of date rape.

I say let Assange have sanctuary in Israel and let some poor homeless Jewish kid live the billionaire lifestyle in Britain that Assange enjoys.”

As STRATFOR is pretty much a “straight arrow,” selling information to clients who are businesses, not spies, their corporate materials are very much the same thing as internet piracy, the theft of Michael Jackson’s or Whitney Houston’s songs.

People who steal those go to jail, hunted down by the FBI. It is called “theft of intellectual property” or “piracy.” This area is one of the FBI’s main tasks.

However, the FBI will never prosecute Wikileaks for “outing” millions in STRATFOR assets, severely damaging the value of an American company and breaking endless laws.

The reason?

This is a Mossad operation, not Wikileaks and, in general, the FBI seldom takes on the Mossad except when they arrested Jonathan Pollard.

Pollard, the most infamous spy in American history, whose continued jailing for decade after decade is hard for some to understand, requires a minimal explanation.

Pollard was never an Israeli spy.

Israel spied, sure it did, but not for itself. Israel spied for the Soviet Union, their real ally during the Cold War. Everything Israel got out of Washington with its hundreds of “dual citizens” went straight to Moscow, war plans, nuclear weapons designs, names of American agents (1100 were executed.)

Pollard will die in jail while hundreds of members of congress demand his immediate release. I am going to quote Andrew Jones on the STRATFOR situation. You are going to love this.

Growing concerns over Iran’s nuclear facilities may prove to be all for naught. Officials from the global intelligence company Stratfor allegedly discussed that Israel may have already destroyed the Iranian nuclear facility, according to one of the emails released by Wikileaks Monday.

In one of the over five million emails leaked, the conversation centered on Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak praising the news of deadly munitions blasts at a base of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards.

“I think this is a diversion. The Israelis already destroyed all the Iranian nuclear infrastructure on the ground weeks ago,” one intelligence official wrote in an email dated November 14, 2011.

“The current ‘let’s bomb Iran’ campaign was ordered by the EU leaders to divert the public attention from their at-home financial problems. It plays also well for the US since Pakistan, Russia, and N. Korea are mentioned in the report. ”

One other Stratfor official allegedly indicated a similar finding.

“Israeli commandos in collaboration with Kurd forces destroyed few underground facilities mainly used for the Iranian defense and nuclear research projects,” he wrote on November 13, 2011.

“Even if the Israelis have the capabilities and are ready to attack by air, sea and land, there is no need to attack the nuclear program at this point after the commandos destroyed a significant part of it.”

Stratfor released a statement on Monday condemning the leaks.

“This is a deplorable, unfortunate – and illegal – breach of privacy,” the company said. “Some of the emails may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies; some may be authentic. We will not validate either.”

Thanks to Andrew Jones.

Of course, the emails will be forged or altered like everything else Wikileaks has handled. They have been caught “fudging” more times than we can count. They edit, they change, they invent, whatever Israel wants to do, they do.

There really is no Wikileaks, not as a functioning concern. It has always been a front for Israel, operated by them with periodic assistance from the Rupert Murdoch empire.

Familiar? Hacking? You know Murdoch, the Fox News “Neocon” guru who hides his Israeli citizenship and Jewish background so he can seem like an “Aussie good ole boy” instead of a spy.

Hacking phones is “wiretapping.” Hacking computers is spying. Taking proprietary corporate information is stealing. Publishing the same is no different than uploading music and movies.

It is all crimes, so why isn’t the FBI out arresting Assange? You are saying you smell a rat, that the FBI might not be who we want them to be?