Press TV Debate: ‘US deep state staging false flag chemical attacks in Syria’


June 28th marked the 30th anniversary of the Iraqi Baath regime’s chemical bombing of Sardasht city in Iran’s West Azerbaijan Province. That, coupled with the recent heated debates surrounding who perpetrated April’s chemical strike in the Syrian town of Khan Shaykhun, prompted Press TV to interview editor of VT Kevin Barrett, and senior US congressional defense advisor Fredrick Peterson to seek their viewpoints on the use of chemical weapons.

Kevin Barrett said the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and certain other entities in the United States are the deep state, which are playing a big role in pushing militaristic agenda both in the country and in other parts of the world.

“This deep state in the United States is stockpiling chemical weapons, biological weapons, ignoring the treaties and then waging false flag attacks or nodding and winking as its allies in Syria wage false flag chemical weapons attacks designed to demonize President [Bashar] Assad,” the commentator said on Sunday night.

Dozens of people were killed in a chemical attack in the Syrian town of Khan Shaykhun in Idlib Province on April 4.

The United States and its allies pointed the finger of blame Syrian government forces. But Damascus vehemently denied the charges.

Barrett further said, “The US and its allies supplied [former Iraqi dictator] Saddam Hussein with those chemical weapons” and indeed were responsible for the imposed war on Iran and the carnage that happened in Sardasht.

Sardasht was the third populated city in the world, after Japan’s Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which was targeted with weapons of mass destruction.

111 civilians lost their lives and more than 8,000 people were affected by the gas attack. Three decades on, thousands are still suffering from serious respiratory and skin problems.

Sardasht gas bombing victims and their families gather to express their sympathy with the victims of the April chemical attack in Khan Shaykhun, Syria.

“The United States is purely an aggressor nation; it has absolutely no defense department; it has only an offense department; it is committing aggression all over the world and it is occupying many dozens of countries,” he added.

The analyst dismissed America’s so-called need to stockpile chemical and biological weapons in order to repel future attacks, noting, “The United States has more military power and spends more money on its military than every other nation in the world combined. The United States has more than enough nuclear power to destroy the world dozens and dozens of times over. And the United States has no enemies [because] there is nobody on its border that is trying to invade the country.”

Barrett also criticized Washington for ignoring international agreements on weapons of mass destruction (WMDs).

“Like so many other supposed arms control efforts, here what we see [is] that in fact it is the bigger countries that are manipulating this process for their own advantage,” he explained.

Meanwhile, the other guest on the program Fredrick Peterson opined, “Many Americans in government quite well agree in principle that the best ideal solution would be a banning and a purging of these weapons from the inventory of all countries.”

WMDs are “repellant,” he said, arguing that “these weapons have been used not by the United States, [but] by its allies. These weapons are commercially produced. They are not difficult to manufacture.”

Peterson explained that WMDs terrorize civilian populations because they are aerial and not target weapons.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

Comments are closed.