Nuclear 9/11, a German Physicist Explains and Debunks the Cover Story (Updated)

By
Gordon Duff
-
10
19859

Introduction:

First of all, this is great work by Heinz Pommer.  Second of all, it is horrific work based on the fact that VT published all of this years before with much more detail.

Pommer does a great job.

What we see now is the effort by those responsible for 9/11 to manage the “truth movement,” something Pommer is out of his element on.



Pommer, a physicist is in 100% agreement with other physicists, whose work he has never seen.  His drawings directly parallel those done by the DOE/IAEA whose work he has never seen as he followed the road fed him by the perpetrators, the truthers, the secret ray gun weapons, nanothermite and the half-truths.  The answers he wanted have been there all along and we can’t help but ask how much more work would he have done if he had known that all of his basic work had been done years ago, superseded and that the who and why had been solved.

Still, Pommer is correct…and gets so much right.

Which raises so many questions, how have so many others with his qualifications been co opted by criminals?

Why did he miss Khalezov’s early work, Prager and then the real solutions from Jeff Smith and others.

The answer is censorship, intimidation, Google Corporation and those who are really responsible for 9/11 and their 100% penetration of the fake 9/11 movement.

Worth the watch.  Then read the information millions have read that gives the answers to the questions he has searched for answers to for so long….information that should have been right in front of him from day one.

How was he kept in the dark?

https://veteranstoday.com/2018/09/25/the-secret-history-of-9-11/

http://www.911history.de/aaannxyz_ch01_en.html

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

10 COMMENTS

  1. hello. actually, Heinz Pommer knows very well Khalezov’ work, he has used it from the beginning, but Pommer has improved Khalezov’ model and Pommer seems to have come closer to 9/11 truth.

    see, Pommer thanks Khalezov at the end of that 2017′ document (not available anymore on his website).

    “My sincere gratitude also goes to Dimitri Khalezov for being the first man to expose the real energy source behind the WTC destruction.”

    http://www.911history.de/pdfs/911_History_en.pdf

    by september 2019, Pommer will release a new version, perhaps Jeff Prager told you about it.

  2. I think that was somewhat misleading. When a small nuke is about to be exploded in solid rock bed, the rock bed hits back as said in the video. Upwards, but there was no such explosions explained when a 500 meters tall building stands above epicenter. The Building will emit the most of the energy, and the smoke cloud will not emerge at that point. I Still think it was done in three stages, first a small nuke will “pulverize” the concrete, thermite will be used to cut the core steel bars and finalluy relative small exploses will deal with the outer core.

    • No, no thermite or demolition charges used, it was all done with nukes – some in vans in the underground parking garage, some in the core, placed on various floors throughout the towers.

    • As Ian said, the thermite ploy is pure misdirection based on junk science. Past that, for the twin towers, the freon tanks make up the difference as they emitted deuterium, a “boost gas”

      or so I was told by the team at Univ at Calif and the DOE.

    • Certainly some conventional explosives were used to create the pyrotechnical display of the “aircraft hitting the buildings”, starting the fires “after the aircraft hit”, cutting the buildings off the electrical grid prior to the SADMs being discharged, and perhaps even to drop the roof structures into the buildings 2 to 3 seconds before the SADMs were set off.

  3. Great vid, thanks, and keeping the topic alive. My question is why are the perps still walking free? We know who did it, we know why. How is “subtle”, but we already know enough. In the U.S. alone, there are hundreds of thousands of people, judges, lawyers, policemen, journalists, trained in observation skills, logic and somewhat articulate. I suggest that they all get jobs fruit-picking and garbage- collecting: maybe they should all give back the money they have made (not earned) since 9-11, to the public purse?
    The obvious problem, which is scantily addressed, is that the super-rich are above the law. Human beings cannot handle obscene wealth, and we should not admire the super-rich, or the wannabe super-rich, either.

  5. The link worked for me to Oligarchs Wargame. It’s a good analysis and similar to AE911Truth…glad to have more proof that our cowardly politicians are cowering to inside terrorists working for Israel.

    My Rep. Wallorski, still insists that Muslims with boxcutters did 9.11….all of it.

    • My 86 year old mother sat down on a monument to 911 in the Baltimore inner harbor, to rest. A rent a cop came over and informed us that she was desecrating a memorial. I laughed so hard and informed him that if he bothered dear mom I’d hold a 911 truth expo every weekend at the monument until he got fired. We talked, he didn’t believe the bullcrap either. Mom got her rest and we moved on.

Comments are closed.