Vladimir Putin: New World Order “hurts the US middle class”

…by Jonas E. Alexis

Vladimir Putin has again every right to say that “globalism,” or the New World Order, has not helped the US middle class—or any middle class in any country. Putin asked rhetorically:

“Has anyone ever given a thought to who actually benefited and what benefits were gained from globalization, the development of which we have been observing and participating in over the past 25 years, since the 1990s? The middle class in the US has not benefited from globalization; it was left out when this pie was divided up.

“The Trump team sensed this very keenly and clearly, and they used this in the election campaign. It is where you should look for reasons behind Trump’s victory, rather than in any alleged foreign interference. This is what we should be talking about here, including when it comes to the global economy.”

Putin stresses an important point here. The only people who have benefitted from the New World Order are, well, New World Order agents. And what is the New World Order anyway? Simple: it is a world in which morality or practical reason is deliberately banned or trashed. That is the definition that I have been working on since the past six years or so.

Practical reason, as Immanuel Kant persuasively argues, binds all human beings together. More importantly, the moment a person violates or denies or dismisses practical reason, or what Kant calls the categorical imperative, that person will soon find himself in a torrent of contradictions, illogical leaps, and intellectual chaos. In other words, the very moment that a person abandons practical reason, then moral or intellectual death is the end result. What, then, does the categorical imperative really offer? Kant says:

“Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.”[1]

So any system that seeks to dismiss the moral law must be wrong precisely because that system will inevitably be incoherent and metaphysically worthless. Kant continues to say that for an action to be good, “it is not enough that it should conform to the moral law—it must also be done for the sake of the moral law.”[2]

This obviously throws the New World Order ideology out the window because the New World Order itself cannot be universalized. New World Order agents continue to destroy one country after another with no moral principle whatsoever. What is so astonishing to much of the world is that New World Order agents see nothing wrong in obliterating men, women and children. They have absolutely no remorse. Listen to Ann Coulter very carefully here:

“Sorry we have to use your country, Iraqis, but you let Saddam come to power, and we are going to instill democracy in your country.”[3]

To “instill democracy,” men, women and children have to die. Mothers have to mourn for their babies, and fathers have to be dislocated. This “democracy” is basically hell on earth. Coulter and her bosses continue to live in a dream world where practical reason plays no role. If that seems to be far-fetched, perhaps it is pertinent to bring in flaming Jewish Neocon Michael Ledeen. He declared:

‘‘Creative destruction’ is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace … We must destroy them to advance our historic mission.”[4]

As it turns out, the New World Order which the Khazarian Mafia and their lackeys have established over the years is not based on the pursuit of the truth or moral principles but on the pursuit of categorical lies, colossal hoaxes, deceptive means, and complete fabrications. You remember how New World Order agents led the American people into Iraq? You remember how they led the “sheeple” into Afghanistan and then Libya? Remember how they wanted to do the same thing in Syria?

You see, no one can universalize the New World Order ideology because it is existentially and fundamentally incoherent. And Kant would have almost certainly thrown it in the dustbin of history once and for all. Kant is not here, but Putin has enough sense to say that the New World Order cripples the middle class in America.

• [1] [1] Emmanuel Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1959), 39.
• [2] Emmanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (New York: Torchbooks, 1964), 390.
• [3] George Gurley, “Tea With Miss Coulter,” NY Observer, November 12, 2011.
• [4] Quoted in John Laughland, “Flirting with Fascism,” American Conservative, June 30, 2003.

Jonas E. Alexis, Senior Editor

Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.

• Read the Latest Posts from Jonas >>>
• Read Jonas’ Archives (2004-2015) >>>