VT: As expected, our Russian report of this story is, itself, quite redacted. The primary issue with “privacy” involves a third party and his family. That third party is Donald Trump and his family means his wife, former Slovenian model and close confidant of Jeffrey and Ghislaine, Melania Knauss.
Every redacted name in the Ghislaine Maxwell Deposition is either “Donald Trump,” or “Alan Dershowitz.”
— The USA Singers (@TheUSASingers) October 22, 2020
Trump tells a different story but the New York Times reported that Epstein introduced Melania to Trump, and this was after his conviction for pedophilia. Epstein didn’t do jail time for child rape, the prosecutor was Trump associate Alexander Acosta.
One VT staffer dated Trump during his Epstein years and tells us that this was more a “one on one” relationship between Trump and Epstein and had little to do with women who were “window dressing.”
At the same time, Epstein was in a relationship with a famous Jewish billionaire from Columbus, Ohio who gave Epstein his plane, much of his money and his massive home in New York. A VT source, a lifelong associate of the Columbus billionaire, was privy to this relationship. The Columbus Jewish billionaire had a home built for Epstein next to his own, even when he married a woman.
When Epstein’s “very good friend” got married, Epstein phoned VT’s source (member of another powerful Jewish family) and cried on the phone…claiming “betrayal.”
…but there was always Donald.
“Epstein, Trump and Trump’s good friend Tom Barrack were ‘a set of nightlife Musketeers,’ author Michael Wolff wrote in his book ‘Fire and Fury.'”
“In those days, if you didn’t know Trump and you didn’t know Epstein, you were a nobody,” Harvard University Law School professor Alan Dershowitz told the Times. Dershowitz served on Epstein’s defense team when he was charged in 2006 with unlawful sex with minors.
The New York Times report recounts “an exclusive” 1992 party that took place at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club. Other than the two dozen or so women flown in to provide the entertainment, the only guests were Trump and Epstein, according to George Houraney, a Florida-based businessman who arranged the party at Trump’s request.
RT: A federal judge in New York has ruled on requests for redactions filed by the US government and Ghislaine Maxwell, the alleged madam of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Some parts of her private life will now not be made public.
The portions that “concern privacy interests,” the disclosure of which “would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’” shall not be divulged to the public, she wrote in the ruling. The judge cited a similar decision in a separate civil case involving Maxwell and her alleged victims, which was taken by Judge Loretta Preska in January.
While Nathan’s ruling does not describe the content that she decided to shield, Preska said she had agreed to keep details of Maxwell’s consensual sexual relationships with adults out of public view.
The new ruling also granted several government requests to redact the parts of transcripts that may undermine the ongoing criminal investigation if made public, and those referring to third parties. In some instances this was done against the defense’s objections, as they posited that the same details were already known publicly through other means. Maxwell’s side “furnishes no evidence to that effect,” the ruling said, explaining the decision.
Maxwell, 59, is accused of recruiting and grooming girls as young as 14 to be sexually abused by Epstein. She was taken into custody last July and repeatedly denied bail on the grounds she was a flight risk. Epstein, a wealthy and well-connected financier convicted of sex offenses, died in 2019 through what was ruled a suicide in his prison cell, where he was awaiting a new trial for his alleged crimes against minors.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Are there a number of actual Military Tribunals being carried out with prisoners ending up at the remodeled Guantanamo Prison? I have come across a LARGE number of internet posts about this. But on viewing information at the Military Tribunals website, I noticed that the only people being processed and tried for the 3 jets and the damage done were allegedly hijackers on the jets. 10 years later. This, of course, is moronic to even consider, and what gain would our interim judicial process hope to achieve by such nonsense? Was BNetanyahu really executed for the Fukushimatard destruction? 10 years gone by and It is a secret that needs to be openly discussed.
Always it is way worse than anyone can imagine it to be – look at the “franklin scandals” and go deep into it… Boystown and Larry King (not the tv host), the child kidnappings, murders, white house child sex parties with George Bush senior, you name it totally fucking sick nobody can believe it and that’s how how they get away with it.
So in case of Trump, assume the worst, or the best if you think shit like this is OK in the “sexual freedoms” legal category;
Trump billionaire homosexual duck ng sex pervert.
First lover Roy Cohn, followed by Epstein.
To prove themselves NOT to be, “personally” in their sick minds both Epstein and Trump engage in daily handjobs blowjobs and occasional vaginal sex with new pretty young girls ,(or boys made up to be girls)..
.literally thousands of thenlm….this for 20 year period in the 80s and 90s why not they can afford it and isn’t that what the american dream is all about for the sick and rich.
In case of court ruling, they already know all allegations probably true, but don’t want to spend time and distraction proving them in court, after all the trial is about Ghislaine, not so much Trump so it’s better to concentrate on charges filed.
The defense would love for it to turn into “sensationalist” public trial about pedophile accusations etc., And this direction could get charges dismissed (!)
Is not sodomizing children both impure and, if reported, sensational. It is also a criminal àct. The Judge needs to recuse himself for being an idiot. Or maybe just a Federalist pedophile.
Classless perversions, arrogant psychopathy, strong aversion to ethics, compulsive lying, harboring and facilitating reprobates, smug, boisterous , completely selfish, bone spurs, racist, dim archaic view of women, void of conscience. Result if entered into public service: Plague, infighting, violent insurrection directly against the capitol, mayhem in all departments, stolen children, massive looting in all departments, severe downgrade of accepted behaviors, economic damage, collapse of credibility of secular democracy, and of course, massive amounts of public money wasted in trials of all kinds for years on end to repair it, including child sex trafficking. What an a hole. No question the worst ever.
David you’re wasting optimism…. 🙂
Very few people , will be remembered in history as actually causing a massive global deterioration in the optimism humans have toward their own species and future ability.
Donald Trump and his clown bus, have starkly reminded us, where we measure on the sentient scale. How this is all handled will provide further undeniable measure.
I beg to differ. The judicial system held its ground unanimously against the big lie that Trump won reelection in a landslide. He is an ignorant buffoon whose power and influence is completely overblown.
In terms of the strictness of the ruling, keeping Trump, or any mention of him, from any subsequent testimony at trial, does indeed remove any further sensationalizing, and lend to a fair trial. On the face of it, this does appear to shield Trump et al., and may cast a shadow on the judge’s motives for anyone hoping to definitively to connect Trump in all of this. However, FWIW in this regard, US District Court Judge Allison Nathan was a Barack Obama appointee.
In present day amongst ordinary persons, if you want to create a society between two persons, you make and sign a legal contract. In that kind of characters as Jeffrey and Ghislaine I guess is like in old times in the nobility, to to create an economical partnership they married between them.
Comments are closed.