US Congress takes no action on Iran sanctions as deadline passes

Rejecting Trump's Tinkerbell magic wand syndrome?

9
2576
Congress let's the new Iran sanctions sleeping giant alone

… from Press TV, Tehran

When will Americans get fed up with claims of Iran being a threat when the IAEA has deemed it to be in full compliance?

[ Editor’s Note: This was a bit melodramatic, as Trump had not been banging the drum on Congress to impose new sanctions. We have reported that the EU lobbied Congress hard not to screw up the JCPOA deal, especially in light of all the investment deals that EU countries have in motion with Iran.

Pretty much the whole world, other than Israel, stands together on saving the JCPOA as opposed to Trump’s proposal; and we have what looks like an Act Two in the Mideast narrative war with Trump’s crazy play to claim Jerusalem as “the eternal capital of Israel”, which is nothing more that show-boating and paying off a campaign promise to his Khazarian Mafia buddies.

If Trump decides not to re-certify the JCPOA again in January, he will keep himself on the world stage as Mr. wheeler-dealer. But we see in today’s news that he is finally woken up from his dodging North Korean talks.



Yesterday, the South Koreans asked Trump to stand down on war-gaming through Spring 2018, so as not to kill their Winter Olympics. The US team is hanging in the wind as to whether it will attend.

And last, we have the White House insider report that Trump will probably face charges from the Mueller investigations, and this will not take years to play out. The Donald may have decided to take some irons out of the fire and save his powder for more critical fights ahead.

The Dems smell blood on the sex abuse charges and the chances of this being their road back to power in Congress; they are willing to bet that more Republican heads will fall than Democrat. But so far, the Dems have lost Conyers and Franken in the Senate. We have not had the pedophilia cases break open in Washington politics yet, but they are legendary… Jim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

We must never miss a chance to remind Americans that they were lied to by their own government about a secret Iranian nuclear weapons program, which was the stuff of hoaxes.

– First published … December 12, 2017

The US Congress misses a deadline to decide on re-imposing anti-Iran sanctions, which were lifted under the 2015 nuclear deal, with reports saying the lawmakers sought to kick the decision on the issue back to President Donald Trump.

On October 13, Trump refused to certify that the Islamic Republic was complying with the agreement, officially called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), under a domestic US law and directed his administration “to work closely with Congress and our allies to address the deal’s many serious flaws.”

The US Congress was given until December 12 to decide whether to slap economic sanctions on Tehran anew.

On Tuesday, White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders told a press briefing that the Trump administration “continues to make encouraging progress with Congress to fix the US–Iran deal and address long-term proliferation issues.”

“There was actually no deadline to act by this week as the administration did not ask that Congress to introduce legislation to re-impose JCPOA-related sanctions,” she added.

Micah Johnson, a spokesman for Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, told ABC News on Monday that “productive discussions” were underway “about the appropriate path forward.”

However, the Congress has so far announced no plans to introduce a resolution to re-impose sanctions. Congressional aides said on Tuesday that the American lawmakers would let the deadline pass without action, Reuters reported.

By doing that, Congress passed the ball back to Trump, who must decide in mid-January if he wants to continue to waive sanctions on Iran.

Trump’s failure to do so would blow apart the deal, a course opposed by European allies, Russia and China, the other parties to the accord.

Eight reports by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog, have so far confirmed Iran’s full commitment to its side of the bargain. Trump, however, has defied the IAEA reports and warned that he might ultimately “terminate” the Iran deal.

A new poll conducted by the Washington-based Brookings Institution, showed that 70 percent of Americans agree that the JCPOA is beneficial for US interests, while 26 percent disagree.

The JCPOA was reached between Iran and the P5+1 countries — namely the US, Russia, China, France, Britain, and Germany — in July 2015 and took effect in January 2016.

Under the accord, Iran undertook to apply certain limits to its nuclear program in exchange for the termination of all nuclear-related sanctions against Tehran.

Other parties to the deal, along with the entire international community, have voiced firm support for the JCPOA, warning Washington against attempts at undermining the landmark deal.

Since Trump’s refusal to certify Iran’s compliance, senior European officials have been intensely lobbying Congress to decide against the re-imposition of anti-Iran bans.

*

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

Comments are closed.