9/11 anniversary special! Psychology of 9/11 truth denial—and our bravest survivor speaks out

Director Charles Ewing Smith on “Demolition of Truth” film; Bob McIlvaine on Bobby McIlvaine Act

By
Kevin Barrett, Senior Editor
-
9
6896

Listen and subscribe on Patreon HERE

First hour: Charles Ewing Smith writes: “I am proud to present the full length version of my Award winning documentary ‘The Demolition of Truth-Psychologists Examine 9/11‘ for free on Youtube.” (Portions of the film were included in Smith’s earlier film 9/11 Explosive Evidence-Experts Speak Out with Richard Gage.) Those interested in the psychology of 9/11 truth denial should also read Fran Shure’s multi-part series “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?”

Second hour: 9/11 survivor Bob McIlvaine joins us to discuss the Bobby McIlvaine Act. Named after his son Bobby, who was killed by an explosion in the North Tower before the first plane hit, the bill would establish a new, independent investigation of the crime of the century.

https://www.ae911truth.org/get-involved/bobby-mcilvaine-act



As 9/11 TAP explains:

“There is precedent for this kind of legislation such as the House Select Committee on Assassinations and the Church Committee. For example, Finding 1C of the House Select Committee on Assassinations stated, ‘The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.’ As a result of this truth coming out of an investigation by a select committee many people are aware that such a process is available.”

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

9 COMMENTS

  2. Give me $200K and I will arrange a group of 20 people to say they saw a plane hit One World Trade Center – its not difficult…
    And they’ll keep their mouths shut if I select a group of people with a distasteful kiddy hobby.

    9/11 was just paid actors/ media company people and some crappy video compositing – time to get over the plane thing.

  3. To back up what Mr. Greenhalgh is saying about “no planes”
    is this: The huge wings would have come off if the fuselage just happened by a miracle to somehow go through, the wings would have fallen to the ground!
    Plus, a long time ago, in the 40’s I think, a plane did hit a skyscraper in NY and it bounced off! You don’t have to be ex Military to realize it was a missile like a bunker buster, to go through that much steel and concrete.
    We definitely need a real investigation into 911, it is long overdue. And thank you Dr. Barrett and Mr. Greenhalgh for your perseverance and diligence.

  4. There were no planes, a Boeing can’t even fly that low and fast, it’s wings would come off at a far lower speed at that altitude.

  5. “The committee is unable to identify”
    Key words are “The Committee”. The committee can’t but there are other agencies which IF they went after this they could do more.

  6. There was no planes on 911, no matter how fast the commercial jets went, they cannot melt into a steel framed building.
    The easiest way I can explain to people who quiz me is, imagine a giant ripping out the north tower, and as the jet arrives, he swings it like a baseball bat, what happens, after impact the jet goes flying away, doesn’t melt into the building.

    • There were no conventional charges, thermite/thermate or otherwise, it was a nuclear demolition. As well as the nukes placed in Urban Moving Systems Vans in the underground parking garages, there were smaller nukes hidden inside fake fire extinguishers placed throughout the towers, in the cores. These were remotely detonated in sequence using GSM cell phone signals.

      There was no Boeing, no pod, that is all just distraction crap.

  7. On 9/11 the airplanes were steered into the buildings by one person quite possibly a woman. Certainly no conspiracy there. One can quite truthfully state that 9/11 was not a conspiracy-a crime committed by more than one person-as long as only the flight of the doomed aircraft is considered. Is there anyone who doubts that the totally fictitious Swedish super hacker Lizbeth Salander (The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo) could have taken over the airplanes on 9/11 and flown them into WTC and the Pentagon? If you believe she could do it then why not a real life super hacker? Or even more likely an insider with an agenda?

Comments are closed.