Mass Shootings, Mass Censorship

Is Gladio B Targeting 1st or 2nd Amendments—or Both at Once?


Watch State Department whistleblower J. Michael Springmann join me on False Flag Weekly News above—click HERE for links to the stories we covered

by Kevin Barrett, VT Editor

Were the mass shootings in Gilroy, El Paso, and Dayton Gladio B false flags aimed at rolling back the 2nd Amendment? Or were they designed to demonize “radicalization on the internet” and chip away at the 1st Amendment?

The probable correct answer is “all of the above.”

They may also have served another purpose: Wipe Jeffrey Epstein out of the headlines during the week before his assassination (or his extraordinary rendition to retirement in Israel).

Now that even the MSM, from tabloids like the NY Post to “serious” outlets like the Washington Post, are scoffing at the unlikely tale of Epstein’s ridiculous “suicide,” expect more bloody distractions this week.

The mass mind controllers claim they need to revoke internet freedom because it is the only way they can stop the rise of white supremacist neo-Nazis. But what they are really worried about is the rise of the truth.

The New York Times even all but admitted this week that the real reason the First Amendment needs to be revoked is so that historians who question the victors’ version of the Holocaust can be imprisoned. Other “truth threats” include Pearl Harbor, the international bankers, the Kennedy assassinations, 9/11, Gladio, MK-Ultra, Zionist power, and so much more.

Ironically, the more they roll back freedom of expression, the more likely that more and  more people will conclude that the only way left to express their anger is through the barrel of a gun. So our overlords’ claim that they are trying to stop violence is a lie. They are trying to incite more and more violence, in order to justify an ever-more-comprehensive Orwellian surveillance state.

The FBI is now demanding a pre-crime “social media early alerting tool” with “real-time geolocation-based monitoring” to defend against “domestic threats”…because, they tell us, “conspiracy theorists are the new terrorists.” Like the NY Times, the FBI is openly admitting that the real threat is the truth.

So watch FFWN while you can. The truth is a precious commodity. It may not be this accessible for much longer.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.


  1. I beleive Loncoln’s main articles of faith was a belief in wage labor for the poor white masses and “50 acres and a mule” for immigrant and vagrant farmers — mut not for the negro masses, they were only to avoid being kept in slavery for perpetuity. Cassius Clay never tired of telling how the Czar of Russia — who had eminisipated the serfs in 1863 — was anry with Lincoln that the U.S. didn’t grant the ‘feed’ freedmen a means to self-support. An rued that the Russian Navies had protected New York and San Fransisco the same year with seven major men-of-war and two smaller escrades.

  2. Kevin: I would add one more “truth threat” to the list: Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War. The great writer Carl Sandburg wrote volumes documenting him. Everyone in my generation of the 1940’s know
    Abraham Lincoln was an honest man who never told a lie and always returned borrowed books no matter how far he had to walk to do it. Something evidently altered his personality when he became President and conducted the Civil War. He was responsible for plunder and destruction of over half the country and deaths and suffering of millions in order to “keep the Union together”. Was this authorized in the Constitution? I don’t find it there. He could have said to the South, “Go you will be back in 20 years and we will welcome you back.” The North had imposed a 40
    % sales tax on the South. How would you like to pay it? I would say Honest Abe morphed into Dishonest Abe during this period and was the first to ratchet up Federal Power against all the good intentions of the Founders.

Comments are closed.