…by Jonas E. Alexis

For more than two years, we have been saying that Russiagate was a total fabrication. It was diabolically cooked up by the Deep State, the warmongers, the Neocons, and the very people who wanted the United States to get involved in a nuclear war with Russia.

Stephen Cohen, professor emeritus of Russian studies and politics at New York University and Princeton University, has also said over and over that Russiagate was a hoax. Cohen screwed up the New World Order by saying that “The unprecedented allegation that the Kremlin ‘attacked America’ and ‘colluded’ with its president in order to elect him is based on two documents devoid of facts or logic.”[1] Cohen continued to say:

“Amid this daily frenzy, it’s often forgotten that Russiagate’s ‘core narrative,’ as one of its most devout and prominent promoters terms it, was inspired by and continues to be based on, two documents, both published in January 2017: an ‘Intelligence Community Assessment’ and the anti-Trump ‘dossier’ compiled by a retired UK intelligence officer, Christopher Steele.

“The ‘core narrative’ of both was, of course, that Putin’s Kremlin had intervened in the 2016 presidential election—essentially an ‘attack on America’—in order to damage Hillary Clinton’s candidacy and abet Trump’s.

“At the time, a few critics questioned the authenticity of the ICA and the dossier, but for political and media Russiagaters, they instantly became, and have remained, canons, despite their deficit of facts and logic. Reread today, in light of what is now known, they are examples of the adage ‘rubbish in, rubbish out.’”[2]

Cohen cited one former intelligence officer saying that the so-called dossier was a “deliberate misrepresentation’—the ICA, by using the term ‘Community,’ gave the impression that its findings were the consensus of all ‘17 US intelligence agencies,’ even though it was signed by only three (the CIA, the FBI, and the NSA) and by the overseeing director of national intelligence, James Clapper.”[3]

The ICA, according to Cohen, “provided almost no facts for its ‘assessment,’” Despite the fact that the media and political whores like Megyn Kelly continued to cite the ICA as evidence that Russia hacked the US election. Even Times magazine, which was perpetuating the same narrative, reluctantly agreed that “hard evidence to back up the agencies’ claims” was missing. The ICA finally admitted at the end of their so-called assessment that there was indeed no factual evidence to support its claims. They said:

“Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact.”[4]

The interesting thing is that the Washington Post cited the CIA saying that “Putin’s specific instructions” were all over “the operation.”[5] Total lie. According to Cohen, The Washington Post “or its Intel leaker just made it up.”[6] Cohen’s conclusion?

The so-called dossier contains “an abundance of factual errors, inconsistencies, outright contradictions, and, equally important, information purportedly from secret Kremlin sources but that had already been published in open Russian or other media. (History shows that the trick to making a falsified document at least semi-plausible is to include a few facts previously verified in open sources.)”[7]

William Binney, a former intelligence official with National Security Agency (NSA) and a mathematician, also declared that Russiagate was a deliberate deception. He once declared:

If the idiots in the intelligence community expect us to believe them after all the crap they have told us (like WMD’s in Iraq and ‘no we don’t collect data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans’) then they need to give clear proof of what they say. So far, they have failed to prove anything.”

That certainly was fair enough. You simply cannot make an outrageous accusation and then leave the scene without providing an iota of evidence, which is exactly what was going on with the so-called Russiagate. If you asked Mr. X for the evidence that the Russiagate thing was legitimate, he would have responded by saying Mr. Y had it; when you asked Mr. Y, he would have responded that Mr. Z has it; when you asked Mr. Z, he would have again said that Mr. X had it. It was a circular argument.

The Neocons and Zionist ethnic cleansers have been playing this game for quite a long time. They think that positing an assertion and repeating it over and over again somehow is evidence for the assertion itself. They knew that they duped the American people before with the events leading up to the Iraq war, and obviously they thought that they were about to do it again.

Now after three years of perpetuating the crazy claim that Russia hacked the US election, that Russia is the enemy of the United States, etc., we are learning that Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent who set-up Orbis Business Intelligence and compiled a dossier on Donald Trump, fabricated the whole thing.[8]

Nigel West, one of Britain’s leading experts on espionage, caught Steele red-handed. Steele perpetuated the claim that, according to the London Times, “Russia had engaged in a conspiracy with Trump campaign team to affect the outcome of the 2016 election. It was used by the FBI to justify the surveillance of four of Trump’s associates.”[9]

West met Steele at a NATO intelligence conference and declared that “I’ve always had the highest respect for him.” But West felt that Steele was desperate to make things up, such as “the existence of the Russian consulate in Miami, Florida.”[10] West declared that Steele was “politically motivated.”[11]

And obviously West was right. “Steele himself was paid purely above-board, of course: by Fusion GPS, which was a client of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP, on behalf of the Democratic National Committee, at the direction of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.”[12]

There is no need to forge evidence to debunk the Deep State, the New World Order, ethnic cleansers, and warmongers in the United States and abroad. Truth, as Solzhenitsyn and Hegel made clear, will work itself out and will triumph over its enemies.

  • [1] Stephen F. Cohen, “Russiagate’s ‘Core Narrative’ Has Always Lacked Actual Evidence,” The Nation, June 20, 2018.
  • [2] Ibid.
  • [3] Ibid.
  • [4] Ibid.
  • [5] Ibid.
  • [6] Ibid.
  • [7] Ibid.
  • [8] “Ex-MI6 spy ‘fabricated dossier on Trump and prostitutes,’” Times, January 27, 2020.
  • [9] Ibid.
  • [10] “West v. Steele: Trump-Russia dossier was ‘FABRICATION,’ colleague & spy expert revealed… YEARS ago,” Russia Today, January 27, 2020.
  • [11] Ibid.
  • [12] Ibid.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.


  1. The Steele dossier isn’t fabricated, Steele had all the contacts inside Russia to produce the intelligence that created the dossier as he had been an MI6 asset inside Russia until 1993 when the KGB kicked him out. He had been based in Samara and one of his roles at that time was to develop the relationships between British intelligence and Russian organised crime that lead to the oligarchs laundering the money they were stealing from the post-Soviet economy through the City of London and several of those oligarchs taking up residence in London under MI6 protection. Steele’s replacement in Samara was Dominic Cummings, who is now chief advisor to Boris Johnson, after being chief advisor to the BREXIT campaign. The major funders of the Conservative Party today are Russian oligarchs, just another tentacle of the network that ties the British banking, intelligence and governmental systems to the Russian mafia, which means Israel wields undue influence over Britain because Israel is also run by the Russian Mafia. Steele and Cummings were the ones who did the point work to set up this crime syndicate with it’s nexus in London. Most of the work done to rig the US election for Trump was done by British intelligence (largely via the Cambrige Analytica front) on behalf of the Russian-Israeli mafia. So no, Russiagate is in no way fabricated and the meddling in both US and British elections was all too real, hence down Downing St and the White House are now occupied by mafia stooges.

  2. BlackBoxVoting(.)org > Beverly Harris explains fractional vote rigging by Hart Intermatic, Electronic Systems & Software (ES&S) and Diebold machines stole every election since 2000. Putin never had a chance, GooGhoul “Man-in-the-Middle” rigging was foiled. Reptillary stole the 2016 donations and primary nomination from Bean Brain Bernie, expected to steal general election, but overerestimated her appeal.

Comments are closed.