Carol graduated from Riverside White Cross School of Nursing in Columbus, Ohio and received her diploma as a registered nurse. She attended Bowling Green State University where she received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History and Literature. She attended the University of Toledo, College of Nursing, and received a Master’s of Nursing Science Degree as an Educator.
She has traveled extensively, is a photographer, and writes on medical issues. Carol has three children RJ, Katherine, and Stephen – one daughter-in-law; Katie – two granddaughters; Isabella Marianna and Zoe Olivia – and one grandson, Alexander Paul. She also shares her life with her husband Gordon Duff, many cats, and two rescues.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.
“The epidemiological hallmark of a new transmissible disease is that it spreads exponentially until it has saturated a susceptible pool of the population, a process described by Farr’s law.” -Peter H. Duesberg in “AIDS Epidemiology: Inconsistencies with Human Immunodeficiency Virus and with Infectious Disease:” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 88, pp. 1575-1579, February 1991.
The attempt to “flatten the curve” was not an attempt to reduce the number of infections but rather an attempt to delay some of the infections so that hospitals would not be overrun with patients in the short run. If some of the people in the susceptible pool of the population have managed, so far, to avoid becoming infected with the virus, when the masks, self isolation and social distancing restrictions are removed, they are at a greater rick of being exposed to the virus and thus to become infected. This is not a “second wave”, it’s simply a continuation of the process of the original spread of the virus.
A scientific question that might be asked under the circumstances would be what is it that makes the difference between those who are in the susceptible pool of the population and those who are not? That is, of course, if an ounce of prevention is still worth a pound of cure.
Comments are closed.