VT: Sherwin, now under investigation, was to protect Trump, Flynn, Stone from Coup Prosecution-source


VT’s sources say William Barr put Michael Sherwin in as DC US Attorney as it became increasingly clear to him that an insane Donald Trump, aided by Russia, would try to overthrow an election he was sure to use…

and so so with violence..

And now, watching Michael Sherwin try to poison the criminal case against Donald Trump and his family and closest associates, most deeply tied to Russian intelligence through the Ukraine…

Daily Beast: The federal prosecutor who initially led the Justice Department inquiry into the Capitol riot didn’t hold back when he sat down with 60 Minutes last week.

In the interview broadcast on Sunday night, Michael Sherwin shared his view that there may be enough evidence to charge some riot suspects with sedition—and that Donald Trump could be held criminally responsible.

But the DoJ doesn’t seem at all happy with those disclosures. Department officials refused to comment Monday when asked if Sherwin had asked for permission before he agreed to the interview, and now a federal prosecutor has confirmed that the DoJ is investigating the matter.

John Crabb, the director of the criminal division for the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, confirmed that Sherwin’s interview has been referred to the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility. Sherwin stepped down as U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C. on Friday to return to the U.S. attorney’s office in Miami.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.


  1. Sowing doubt in Trumps liability, is not a one sided affair. Both parties enjoy the undeserved privileges of the non-prosecution enigma of the presidency. None of which is based in law or the intention of the constitution or any invisible favoring of one branch or another.
    Hard to swallow, that 60 minutes did not contact someone in DOJ before airing the interview.
    Building a conspiracy against the militias as standalone conspirators, clouds the “incitement ” charges. But again, in plain view, there is enough to charge Trump and cohorts, but timidity seems to be the position, unless “protecting the office” was the goal all along. That is my suspicion until proven otherwise. “protecting the office” is squarely against equal justice for all.
    We do not have Kings,… but we do have many who wish to be as close as possible.
    Prince Harry’s title is still prince and Duke,….emotionality is a common theme amongst those in power at this moment. The obvious followup scheme to an obnoxious aggression. Oh gee golly, we feel terrible. Oh shucks , what are we gonna do ? Long game in plain view.

  2. American rule of law – USA citizenship study guide
    12. What is the (American) “rule of law”?
    a.• Everyone must follow the law.
    b• Leaders must obey the law.
    c• Government must obey the law.
    d• No one is above the law [/excerpt]

    Why are the tenets implied and codified
    as the American “rule of Law” not enforced
    nor equally applied? Dereliction of your duties
    as a public servant is the epitome of moral turpitude
    Bic ?

Comments are closed.