…by Jonas E. Alexis, VT Editor

Daniel J. Flynn argues in his book Intellectual Morons that “When ideology is your guide, you’re bound to get lost. Ideology deludes, inspires dishonesty, and breeds fanaticism. Facts, experience, and logic are much better at leading you to the truth. Truth, however, is not everyone’s intended destination…PhDs, high IQs, and intellectual honors are not antidotes to thick-headedness.”[1]

Sadly, I have personally found this to be true over the years. I’ve interacted with historians, scholars, and writers of various stripes and I have been literally stunned by how they have no respect for serious scholarships, rigorous investigation, and ultimately a love for the truth.

Moreover, I have been amazed to see how they tried to get around the obvious in order to preserve their cherished ideology. I later found out that some of them would astonishingly invent things out of thin air in order to rescue their own ideology from historical oblivion.[2] This has been one of my frustrations because you simply cannot reason people out of an ideology that was not formed on the basis of reason.[3]

I have interacted with Ashraf Ezzat in the past, and I am still amazed at how a man of his stature would put his credibility on the line by making fantastically risible statements and by relying on shaky foundations. Here are a few examples from his new article:

“Contrary to what western orientalists and scholars have for so long believed, Messiah has absolutely nothing to do with Jesus Christ or Western spirituality for that matter…

“At the core of this whole Messianic culture is ancient Arabian/tribal tradition intimately interwoven with pagan myths.  During the centuries leading up to the birth of Christianity, various cults known as `Mystery Religions‘ had spread throughout the Pagan world.

“At the center of these Mystery cults was a story about a dying and resurrecting godman who was known by many different names in many different cultures.

“In Egypt, where the Mysteries originated, he was known as Osiris, in Greece as Dionysus, in Syria as Adonis, in Italy as Bacchus, in Persia as Mithras. These Pagan myths had been rewritten and interwoven with the theme of the Arabian Messiah as the gospel of Jesus Christ. Without that subtle blend, the Arabian Messianic culture couldn’t have managed to seep into and take root in western Psyche and spirituality.”

This is really bad, so bad in fact that Ezzat is actually insulting honest skeptics and serious researchers out there. A few years ago, I interacted with David Turner of the Jerusalem Post on this very issue. Turner appealed to the new ridiculous view that maybe Christianity drew its conclusions from “mystery religions and the man-god Osiris-Dionysus,”[4] a notion that is quite common among popular people such as Dan Barker and Timothy Freke, and Peter Gandy.

The notion was also the locus of the almost defunct documentary film Zeitgeist, a propaganda film widely recognized by many atheist writers and skeptics for its “fuzzy thinking,”[5] its “nonsense,”[6] its “implicit deception,”[7] and even its “crap.”[8]

The notion that the historical Jesus is similar to mystery religions such as Bacchus, Dionysus, Osiris, etc., and that Christianity probably emulated those religions, is so preposterous—and quite frankly, historically irresponsible—that one needn’t be a historian or scholar to say that it is completely crazy.

Osiris for example was the son of Nut, the sky-goddess, and Geb, the earth god. Nut was an adulterer and was formerly the wife of the Sun. While Osiris was inside Nut’s womb, he fell in love with his sister Isis, with whom he had sexual intercourse and produced a child named Horus. The nut also had other offspring, whose names were Nephthys, Set, etc.

After their birth, Osiris again had sexual intercourse with Nephthys, the wife of his brother, Set. Filled with anger and rage, Set ended up drowning Osiris in the Nile River and cutting him into 14 pieces. Isis found the pieces but could not find the last one, Osiris’s sexual organ. As a result, she reconstructed it with pieces of wood and began to have sexual intercourse with him. The mythological story goes on and on.[9]

Likewise, Dionysus was the Greek god of wine and revelry, madness, and ecstasy, which also encompasses religious dance and, according to Herodotus, demon possession.[10] This was one reason why Nietzsche favored Dionysus over the Christian God because Dionysus, according to Nietzsche, would bring about the transvaluation of all values, including sexual values. Nietzsche introduced the idea in The Birth of Tragedy, first published in 1871 (the year in which Darwin published The Descent of Man), and moved on to expand on it in nearly all his other writings.[11]

Here’s what Paul says,

“But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils, Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table, and the table of devils. Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than he?” (1 Corinthians 10:20-22).

Now we are being told that Christianity borrowed from the myths mentioned earlier! Moreover, when Paul was on top of Mars’ Hill when he mentioned the resurrection to the pagan philosophers and thinkers, “some mocked, and others said, We will hear thee again of this matter” (Acts 17:32). As one writer has pointed out, they could have just said something like, “This sounds like the stuff we have read from Homer and others. No difference.”

Here is another interesting point. Christians, from the first century and all the way to the fourth century, were killed, tortured, decapitated, and thrown to the lions, for believing in monotheism and were even called “atheists” for rejecting the very essence of the Osiris-Dionysus-Bacchus and pagan worship, and now we are being told that they got their ideas from mystery religions! Isn’t that something? Is that a sober and sound scholarship?

Ancient historian Manfred Clauss of the Free University of Berlin argues that it does not make any sense to interpret the mystery religions “as a forerunner to Christianity.” He adds,

“Mithraism was an independent creation with its own unique value within a given historical, specifically Roman, context.”[12]

Likewise, a scholar of antiquity Edwin M. Yamauchi argues that Mithraism could not have influenced Christianity in any theological or historical context for the very reason that Christianity is older than Mithraism and the texts for Mithraism are dated after A.D. 140.

Moreover, what is made available to scholars is only dated from the second, third, and fourth centuries A.D. In a similar vein, other scholars and archeologists such as Richard Gordon declare that the story of Mithraism was not popular until the reign of Hadrian.[13] In other words, the historical evidence for mystery religions in first-century Palestine is non-existent.

Moreover, mystery religions were secret cults and operated within two basic principles: “The injunction to silence, intended to prohibit ritual details from reaching the outside world; and the promise of salvation to the initiates.”[14] In other words, they were forerunners of Freemasonry. Yet both Jesus and Paul, when they were on trial, declared that they did nothing in secret (John 18:20; Matthew 10:26-27; Acts 26:26). In the words of Oxford scholar E. J. Yarnold,

“The fervor with which historians used to detect wholesale Christian borrowings from the Mithraic and other mysteries has now died down.”[15]

In a similar vein, Oxford historian Robin Lane Fox denounced those who draw parallels between Christianity and pagan religions as irresponsible.[16] Other scholars such as L. Patterson and Gary Lease have made similar remarks.[17]

Interestingly enough, the idea that Christianity borrowed from pagan religions was started by none other than Richard Reitzenstein (1861-1931), a German Jewish classical philologist who started the History of Religions School in Germany.[18] Then the idea began to mutate in the minds of other Jewish scholars such as Hugh J. Schonfield who wrote Those Incredible Christians.

Then it progressively migrated into a book that is known only to scholars named The Golden Bough, by James Frazer (1854-1941).[19] Popular authors began to adopt the idea and spread it into the cultural landscape.

Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy’s The Jesus Mysteries and Tom Harpur’s The Pagan Christ are classic examples. Yet the story became even more problematic for those mythicists when their theories are confronted with a core historical claim.[20]

Moreover, the mythicists’ comparison between Christianity with Mithraism is a terrible non-sequitur. For example, Jesus was born of a virgin, but Mithras was born out of a rock![21] And all through the early centuries, the early church fathers pinned Mithraism as a satanic cult. All through the New Testament, Christians are told to “keep yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21). In Athens, Paul’s “spirit was stirred in him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry” (Acts 17:16).

Yet now we are being told that the early Christians borrowed from those satanic cults. It simply boils down to fanciful speculations, some of which are summoned deliberately. As scholar Ronald H. Nash pointed out,

“The uncompromising monotheism and the exclusiveness that the early church preached and practiced make the possibility of any pagan inroads…unlikely, if not impossible.”[22]

First published on October 22, 2015.


  • [1] Daniel J. Flynn, Intellectual Morons: How Ideology Makes Smart People Fall for Stupid Ideas (New York: Crown Forum, 2004), 1.
  • [2] For examples of this, see Jon Wiener, Historians in Trouble: Plagiarism, Fraud, and Politics in the Ivory Tower (New York and London: The New Press, 2005); https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2014/07/13/scientific-frauds-academic-gangsters-and-the-khazarian-theory-revisited/.
  • [3] A classic example can be found here: https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2014/08/25/anti-zionism-rises/.
  • [4] David Turner, “The Jewish Problem—From Anti-Judaism to Anti-Semitism,” Jerusalem Post, October 24, 2012; Turner repeated the same thing in later articles: “Christian Insecurity: The Search for the Historical Jesus,” Jerusalem Post, November 13, 2014; “Christian Insecurity: The Search for the Historical Jesus,” Jerusalem Post, November 13, 2014.
  • [5] Ivor Tossell, “Conspiracy Theories Yelling in the Echo Chamber,” Globe and Mail, August 17, 2007.
  • [6] “Zeitgeist: The Nonsense,” Irish Times, August 8, 2007.
  • [7] Jane Chapman, Issues in Contemporary Documentary (Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2009), 172.
  • [8] Michelle Orange, “Able Danger,” Village Voice, September 10, 2008.
  • [9] See William Lane Craig and Paul Copan, eds., Come Let Us Reason (Nashville: B & H, 2012), chapters 10 and 11.
  • [10] See E. R. Dodds, The Greeks and the Irrational (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951), chapter 3.
  • [11] For scholarly accounts on Nietzsche and the Greek god Dionysus, see Charles Segal, Dionysiac Poetic and Euripides’ Bacchae (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982); John Burt Foster, Heirs to Dionysus; A Nietzschean Current in Literary Modernism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981); Martin Persson Nilsson, The Dionysiac Mysteries of the Hellenistic and Roman Age (New York: Arno Press, 1979); Carl Roebuck, The Muses at Work: Arts, Crafts, and Profession in Ancient Greece and Rome (Boston: MIT Press, 1969); Eric Csapo and Margaret C. Miller, ed., The Origins of Theater in Ancient Greece and Beyond (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007); John Bartholomew O’Connor, Chapters in the History of Actors and Acting in Ancient Greece (New York: Haskell House, 1966); Ismene Lada-Richards, Initiating Dionysus: Ritual and Theater in Aristophanes’s Frogs (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999); E. Michael Jones, Dionysos Rising: The Birth of Cultural Revolution out of the Spirit of Music (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1994).
  • [12] Manfred Clauss, The Roman Cult of Mithras: The God and His Mysteries (New York: Routledge, 2001), 7.
  • [13] See Lee Strobel, The Case for the Real Jesus (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2007), chapter 4.
  • [14] Clauss, The Roman Cult of Mithras, 14.
  • [15] Strobel, The Case for the Real Jesus, 169.
  • [16] See his long treatise on the history of Christianity and paganism in Pagans and Christians (New York: Penguin, 1986).
  • [17] Strobel, The Case for the Real Jesus, 169-172.
  • [18] There were others such as Franz Cumont involved in blending Christianity with the mystery religions
  • [19] For a sociological and historical critique of Frazer’s work, see Rodney Stark, Discovering God: The Origins of the Great Religions and the Evolution of Belief (New York: HarperOne, 2007).
  • [20] Strobel, The Case for the Real Jesus, 161.
  • [21] Ibid., 171.
  • [22] Komoszewski, Sawyer, and Wallace, Reinventing Jesus, 232.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.


  1. In The Blatchford Controversies, G.K. Chesterton writes: “Mr. Blatchford and his school point out that there are many myths parallel to the Christian story; that there were Pagan Christs, and Red Indian Incarnations, and Patagonian Crucifixions, for all I know or care. But does not Mr. Blatchford see the other side of the fact? If the Christian God really made the human race, would not the human race tend to rumours and perversions of the Christian God? If the centre of our life is a certain fact, would not people far from the centre have a muddled version of that fact? If we are so made that a Son of God must deliver us, is it odd that Patagonians should dream of a Son of God?
    The Blatchfordian position really amounts to this – that because a certain thing has impressed millions of different people as likely or necessary, therefore it cannot be true. And then this bashful being, veiling his own talents, convicts the wretched G.K.C. of paradox. I like paradox, but I am not prepared to dance and dazzle to the extent of Nunquam, who points to humanity crying out for a thing, and pointing to it from immemorial ages, as proof that it cannot be there. (continued)

    • …The story of a Christ is very common in legend and literature. So is the story of two lovers parted by Fate. So is the story of two friends killing each other for a woman. But will it seriously be maintained that, because these two stories are common as legends, therefore no two friends were ever separated by love or no two lovers by circumstances? It is tolerably plain, surely, that these two
      stories are common because the situation is an intensely probable and human one, because our nature is so built as to make them almost inevitable.
      Why should it not be that our nature is so built as to make certain spiritual events inevitable? In any case, it is clearly ridiculous to attempt to disprove Christianity by the number and variety of Pagan Christs. You might as well take the number and variety of ideal schemes of society, from Plato’s Republic to Morris’ News from Nowhere, from More’s Utopia to Blatchford’s Merrie England, and then try to prove from them that mankind cannot ever reach a better social condition. If anything, of course, they prove the opposite; they suggest a human tendency toward a better condition.
      Thus, in this first instance, when learned sceptics come to me and say, “Are you aware that the Kaffirs have a sort of Incarnation?” I should reply: “Speaking as an unlearned person, I don’t know. But speaking as a Christian, I should be very much astonished if they hadn’t.”

    • I agree with you somewhat. A plethora of Christ-like stories in various cultures does not prove a Christ never existed. It rather suggests the reverse. Even the very clear (in my opinion) evidence that Greek classical literature was used extensively as source material to construct the Gospels along a very well established literary tradition of mimesis does not prove that a Christ or Christs never existed, particularly because the mimesis tradition allowed for historical material to be interwoven with the other story material of a more mythical nature. Historical source material no longer available to us but chronicling the life of a Christ may have been used, probably was. It is also quite possible that such Greek stories as that of Dionysus may have been a perversion of an early record of a Christ-like figure.

  2. My issue with monotheism stems from its insistence of the existence of Devil’s. Devil’s are in my understanding “gods”who have nearly equal yet opposite mores to that of the “chosen” one.

    Moreover, mystery religions were secret cults and operated within two basic principles: “The injunction to silence, intended to prohibit ritual details from reaching the outside world; and the promise of salvation to the initiates.”[14] In other words, they were forerunners of Freemasonry. Yet both Jesus and Paul, when they were on trial, declared that they did nothing in secret (John 18:20; Matthew 10:26-27; Acts 26:26). In the words of Oxford scholar E. J. Yarnold,
    The books not included in the Christianity narrative to me are secrets concealed to simple followers.

    Cosmic debris has a ratio of organic matter to inorganic 1000’s of times more rich than native earth stones.
    I’m inclined to believe something could be born of stone as likely a baby born from a virgin.

    • Devils or demons are fallen angels, who rebelled against God’s plan to raise humans above them to share in His Divine Nature, and to exalt a woman as Queen of Heaven and Earth. How do we know this? It has been revealed by God, taught by Christ’s apostles and their successors, preserved from error (but not from sin) by the Holy Spirit. In a nutshell it’s in this little catechism which young children used to memorize before the unprecedented revolution in the Catholic Church in the 1960s:

  3. While, as Jonas says, it would not be right to say that the biblical authors borrowed or simply recycled older myths, there is evidence that older myths were creatively transformed by the biblical authors to create stories of higher moral tone. Such authors as Phillipe Wajdenbaum: Argonauts of the Desert (Old Testament) and Dennis R. MacDonald: Mythologizing Jesus (New Testament) offer serious arguments that the Greco-Roman literary tradition of mimesis was at play in the creation of both biblical testaments, despite what the commonly accepted historical time line might suggest. In story after story, valuable dramatic elements from one or more Greek classics were rearranged and artistically reworked to create works of higher moral value, with artful hints left for the intelligent reader as to the source material used (credit given where credit was due). The mimesis tradition is in line with Plato’s agenda in the Laws to rewrite Greek myth so that the gods are not portrayed as treacherous toward men, immoral, or at war with one another. This aim of these creative rewrites was, of course, to promote right governance, not to help people find God per se. Pity that both of the fine authors mentioned above are atheists, but as the Indian sage Aurobindo wrote, atheism can be a very pure form of religion.

Comments are closed.