‘Why Europe needs Russia more than ever’: Open Letter from European politicians

Can the freeze on EU and Russian relations thaw?
Can the freeze on EU and Russian relations thaw?
Can the freeze on EU and Russian relations thaw?

… from Russia Today,  Moscow

Junkers is heading to Russia to talk to Putin
Junkers is heading to Russia to talk to Putin

[ Editor’s Note: My, my… what a breath of fresh air to see European politicians forming their own new groups to speak out on some of the childish actions of its major political organization with its self-inflicted Russian sanction boomerang wounds.

Election time is really when some change can take place in the EU, but the opposition has to show it can get its position publicized and not be ignored, so it can pull in more support, and so that it becomes a visible “growing” opposition, which the EU elites will then try to defuse by making some policy changes.

France is having major labor upheavals, which can have a ripple effect in stimulating more street action; without elections, that is the only action that gets the attention of the ruling politicians.

VT thanks these EU leaders for stepping forward and leading by example. May more join them while there is still time to salvage a future that any of us could look forward to.

The EU leadership may already be reading the tea leaves. Jean-Claude Junkers, President of the EU Commission is heading to the St. Petersburg Economic Conference and his spokesman has already said that he plans to discuss EU-Russian relations. So we finally have the ball in play, while the US is pouting and bullying US companies from attending, and dismayed that EU leaders are not following orders to not talk with Putin… Jim W. Dean ]



– First published  …  June 11,  2016

The following is an open letter, sent to RT by Rachida Dati, a French politician and Member of the European Parliament, and undersigned by 12 European politicians, that explains why EU sanctions against Russia should be lifted.

In October 2014, a few months after EU sanctions had been decreed against Russia, we already thought that missing the Russian partner was a mistake both on the political (on the Syrian conflict) and the economical level (for our agriculture), and we would pay it dearly.

Today, more than two years after the implementation of these sanctions in reaction to the situation in Ukraine, the warning signals are still red.

In July 2014, the European sanctions were extended to personalities including some of the Russian intelligence, preventing them from getting a visa and travel to the European Union. Aleksandr Bortnikov, head of the Federal Security Service and Mikhail Fradkov, director of foreign intelligence services, are both concerned by the sanctions.

Let us recall that the United States has also imposed sanctions, mainly economic ones, to Russia, but that they never went as far as jeopardizing their security cooperation with the heads of the intelligence service. So, why are we putting so much efforts in this, at the expense of our own security?

These sanctions impact us twice, both on the French and on the European levels, as demonstrated by the suspension of the Cooperation Council on security issues since the Ukrainian crisis. This Council was bringing together the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Ministers of Defense from both French and Russian sides. These annual meetings have not taken place since October 2012 in Paris. And even if interactions do continue, lifting sanctions would allow full-scale exchanges.

Practically, this means that the heads of Russian intelligence would be able to get visas to the European Union so as to be able to directly meet and interact with their counterparts. In this field, trust is fundamental and visa bans clearly damage high-level cooperation and dialogue, as we need them to confront the threat we are facing.

How can we explain that these sanctions are in our own interest, the interest of the Europeans, when one knows the impact and possible consequences of breaking or weakening the exchange of information between two countries?

The attacks in Paris and Brussels sadly reminded us that this cooperation is far from being optimal even within the EU. Russian citizens themselves have been hit hard by terrorism. If we continue to weaken our cooperation with Russia in this field, we are participating to put our citizens in danger.

Russia, thanks to its positions in Syria, has access to valuable information on ISIS, which we would be wrong to turn away from, as the enemy we face is multifaceted and ever-evolving. If it is not thanks to passion, let it be thanks to reason that we cooperate with the Russian State, in order to exchange critical information on the positions and intentions of ISIS.

Then, we must learn to act responsibly, in a concrete way and be done with ideals that do not satisfy anyone. This realpolitik is no longer a choice, it is a duty imposed by the world around us. We may not agree on everything, we can sanction where it hurts, but there are goals and interests that require that we go beyond the desire to punish.

Take the example of Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu’s government has decided to strengthen its ties with Russia, to enhance its national security, even though Moscow is working closely with Iran, Israel’s most hostile and powerful enemy in the region. Without taking any country’s sides in the region, the Israeli decision shows that realpolitik – the Israelis’ security – goes beyond geopolitics. If Israel does it, why not us?

After two years of sanctions, we hence know the cost of division, and we are afraid it is immeasurably higher than that of cooperation with Russia. Besides, Russia also wants to help us. To those who doubt it, let us remind them that after the 13th November attacks, François Hollande and Vladimir Putin agreed to establish closer coordination between both countries’ armies on Syria.

European citizens would not understand if we deprive ourselves any longer of information that is able to ensure their safety and protect them from the horrors we have known Paris and Brussels recently. The geo-economic war taking place between Russia and the European Union must no longer stand in the fight against terrorism.

While the European Council must decide on 28th and 29th June on the renewal – or not – of sanctions against Russia, let us call together to revive security cooperation between those two major players of the international scene. More and more voices in Europe already call for a re-evaluation of sanctions and the lifting of sanctions applied to individuals, as showed by the French Senate’s vote on 8th June which called, with a wide majority, for a reassessment and even the lifting of the sanctions.

History will prove right those who find the political courage to make such a statement.

We, the undersigned:

Rachida DATI – PPE FRANCE (Parti Populaire Européan)



Alfred SANT – S&D MALTE (Socialistes & Démocrates)



Ivo VAJGL – ALDE SLOVENIE (Alliance des Libéraux et des Démocrates pour l’Europe)






The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.



We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

Comments are closed.