Why Putin and Assad Defeated Satanism in Syria with Introduction

Editor’s note:  VT runs study groups, some for years.  Between us, many are historians, biblical scholars, even archaeologists.  I am going to be up front with folks, so listen up:

History is distorted, not just to buff up Churchill or Woodrow Wilson.  We have a study group on ancient religions.  Working with scholars around the world, with me “on the ground” in Spain, France, Italy, Greece, Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia, Crete, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and much more, while working with Jim Dean and a team and Johns Hopkins that does genetic research, we are confronted with the following.

There may well be no Jewish race, no “Jewish” people at all, no ancient Jewish kingdom, and, in particular, what we know for fact.  Jews were never in Egypt, never crossed the Sinai, there was no Moses, no Passover, no “deal” with a god, all of it was made up.

We have slam dunk scholarship to back it up.  We have slam dunk science to back it up.

We also recognize a struggle I might oversimplify as “light v. darkness” that has left several trails.  We followed early Christianity, 2nd century and later, and watched Byzantine Christendom, particularly after Nicaea, declare war on Christianity, the church of James in Jerusalem, and begin what tracks out to be a Luciferian conflict two centuries old.

The creation of the myth of biblical Israel is part of it, the establishment of the Roman “church” and its further fall under the Jesuits into warring cults.  John Paul II was shot because of his worship of Magdelene, not because of Poland or the Cold War.  We re-examined the 9th crusade, the inquisition, Cromwell, witchcraft, the schism’s between Rome, Constantinople and Avignon, and the parallels across Turkey, Syria and into Persia up to the 5th Century.

By my estimation, we are playing out something thousands of years old here, call it religion or supernatural or “alien,” which is my choice, and we are seeing the planned fall of mankind at the hands of “elites” who cut a deal with something, something they would like to call a god and have done so behind the creation and “filthificaiton” of several religions, chief among them Judaism.  And so it goes.  Enjoy.

…by Jonas E. Alexis and Phil Butler

Phil Butler is a policy investigator, political analyst, and an expert on Eastern Europe. He’s the author of the recent book Putin’s Praetorians: Confessions of the Top Kremlin Trolls. Butler now lives on the Island of Crete in Greece.

JEA: What do you make of Russian presidential hopeful Ksenia Sobchak? She has recently come out and supported the anti-Russian sanctions imposed by the US. Do you think she is playing into the hands of her oppressors? Or have the oligarchs and the Powers That Be recrewed her for this very job?

PB: Sobchak’s father was Anatoly Sobcha, mentor and teacher of both Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev. She is smart, connected, and the chances are better she is in the race to deliver her oppressors into Putin’s hands, just to be honest. Already the Vitali Shkliarov minions seem to have latched on. Sobcha will divert Nevalny supporters. We may see blogger Nevalny disappear altogether now.

JEA: Why did CNN specifically interview her? Why didn’t they interview other presidential candidates? Or why not Putin himself? Are they scared?

PB: CNN, and the Neocon/liberal order that runs Western media, want anybody but Putin. Even a Putin protégé would be acceptable for them now.

JEA: Russia Today has reported that Sobchak “also reiterated her allegation that the reunification of Crimea and the Russian Federation was a violation of international law.” I thought that was interesting because Sobchak must know that Crimea has been part of the Russian Federation for centuries. There are people on the lunatic fringe out there who still believe that “Russia invaded Crimea.” I always have a good laugh over this. It is like saying that the United States invaded Florida. What’s your take on this?

PB: It is a shrewd move by the team behind Sobchak, baiting the Putin haters with promises that can never be kept. The Russian people would rebel if any leader tried to give Crimea back to Ukraine now. Crimea was never the issue anyway, the Western strategists knew Putin could never allow Crimea to fall into NATO hands. Let’s be realistic, what does the average Western billionaire care for Crimea people? As you suggest, the whole notion is ridiculous.

JEA: Even Zionist outlets such as USA Today reported that “Crimea’s election committee said that 97% of voters backed a union between the largely ethnic-Russian peninsula and the huge neighboring country.”[1][2]

Reuters, of all places, declared that the vast majority of Crimeans voted in order to “quit Ukraine for Russia.” In a similar vein, the Washington Post, another Zionist outlet, did not refute the claim that Crimeans overwhelmingly voted for Russia. National Public Radio, Bloomberg, the Irish Times, the Baltimore Sun, and even PBS agreed with the polls that Crimeans wanted to connect with Russia.[3]

My simple question is this: Why is Sobchak regurgitating an old lie when the evidence is against her? 97 percent of Crimeans voted for Russia, but Sobchak thinks this is undemocratic! Can you expand on this issue for us?

PB: What politicians “think” and what their “strategy dogma” is, are two completely different things. We are talking about a political “platform” here. Remember in Mr. Putin’s press meetup recently, when he disparaged some for running “without a plan?” Sobchak, in order to even appear as a candidate, has to diverge from the Putin administration, from the status quo. This is what we are seeing. Again, Crimea is part of Russia no matter what.

JEA: Well said. Putin has already given the Neocon establishment and warmongers something to think about. Some politicians and observers have also seen his work in the political landscape.

The fact that Putin helped stop the bloody war in Syria shows that he means business. The fact that he has publicly exposed key exponents of the New World Order for years indicates that he is not afraid to attack or challenge some of the sweeping dogmas that the US has universally forced upon much of the Middle East.

I remember when a so-called Syrian rebel (terrorist) was caught on camera eating the organ of a dead soldier from the Assad government, Putin denounced the United States and much of the countries in the West that were supporting those terrorists. He said then:

“I believe you will not deny that one should hardly back those who kill their enemies and eat their organs. … Do you want to support these people? Do you want to supply arms to these people?”

Putin moved on to say that those terrorist and cannibalistic acts hardly represent “humanitarian and cultural values” of the West. Moreover, no so-called rebel in Syria had the permission to invade the country and terrorize communities and cities. They were terrorist invaders or infiltrators who got political and financial backing from Israel, the United States, Saudi Arabia, the UK, etc. Putin said:

“If we speak calmly, in a businesslike fashion, let me draw your attention to the fact that Russia supplies arms to the legitimate government of Syria in full compliance with the norms of international law… Let me emphasize that: we are not breaching any rules and norms, and we call on all our partners to act in the same fashion.”

Did the Israeli regime and the Zionist States of America keep the deal? Of course not. They tried every dumb excuse to make Syria look like Iraq: “red line,” “chemical weapons” by Assad government, Assad was liquidating his own people, Assad was another Hitler, etc., etc.

If Assad survives the New World Order ideology, it is not because NWO agents didn’t try. NWO agents lost because they were operating with a system that was and still was essentially immoral, illogical, unthinkable, and diabolical or satanic. And by satanic we mean the New World Order ideology was categorically and metaphysically against the moral and political order.

• [1] Charles McPhedran and Anna Arutunyan, “Crimea votes to join Russia; Ukrainians prepare for war,” USA Today, March 17, 2014; see also “95.7% of Crimeans in referendum voted to join Russia – preliminary results,” Russia Today, March 16, 2014.
• [2] Carol Morello, Pamela Constable, and Anthony Faiola, “Crimeans vote to break away from Ukraine, join Russia,” Washington Post, March 16, 2014.
• [3]  “Crimeans Ready For Vote On Joining Russia,” National Public Radio, March 14, 2014; “Crimeans vote to join Russia,” PBS, March 17, 2014; “Crimeans Choose to Join Russia in Vote, Exit Poll Shows,” Bloomberg, March 17, 2014; “Crimeans vote overwhelmingly to join Russia,” Irish Times, March 16, 2016; “Crimeans vote to join Russia, separate from Ukraine,” Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2014.

Jonas E. Alexis, Senior Editor

Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.

• Read the Latest Posts from Jonas >>>
• Read Jonas’ Archives (2004-2015) >>>