PR and psy-ops experts know that the best way to “skunk” a message is to put it in the mouth of an unappealing spokesperson. That’s why the bankster cabal that owns the West, terrified by Islam’s prohibition of usury, has taken the notion of unifying the Muslim-majority countries into a single Caliphate—a project supported by two-thirds of the world’s Muslims—and affixed it to the flag of their own brutal, drug-addled mercenaries.
The banksters have succeeding in sowing chaos throughout the Muslim East. But the Caliphate project, and the eventual destruction of the Empire of Usury, won’t go away.
-Kevin Barrett, VT Editor
ISIS in Khorasan and Hind: Pakistan and the Next Three Years
by Sabtain Ahmed Dar
“The crux of global war on terrorism is that intelligence agencies such as CIA, MI6 and Mossad have taken the peaceful idea of the Caliphate from Islam and deceptively handed it over to their mercenaries (Kharijites) to frame it as ‘Terrorism’. This strategy is aimed initially to turn the world against Islam and use Kharijites as a pretext to further destabilize and disintegrate the last remaining strong Muslim nation-states to enhance the security of Israel”.
On 11th and 15th of May, 2019 ISIS declared its provinces inside India and Pakistan after it claimed attacks in Indian occupied Kashmir and Baluchistan, Pakistan. According to SITE Intelligence Group, ISIS has been involved in operations inside Afghanistan since 2015. Why would the Israeli group SITE become the first group to release ISIS footage? What is their larger agenda? Why are they in Afghanistan and claiming provinces inside India and Pakistan? How will the future of South Asia look with rise of ISIS in Khorasan and Hind? What are the strategic implications and impact on Pakistan? How are they and their weapons being transported from Iraq and Syria to Afghanistan? What should be done to maintain the current map of South Asia? As there is no precedent to analyze the role of deception and secrecy in International Relations to find clarity about reality, the following comprehensive analysis ks based on an investigative and predictive approach to explaining these research questions.
ISIS: Israeli Secret Intelligence Service
Firstly, this issue cannot be understood by any means if one is not aware who created ISIS and how they are being sophisticatedly armed and funded to attain strategic objectives through hybrid warfare. According to a report citing former US National Security Agency officer and whistleblower Edward Snowden the actual name of the head of the so-called Islamic State Abu Bakar Al-Baghdadi is Elliot Shimon who is a trained Mossad agent working in coordination with the U.S Secret Service, British Intelligence and Israeli Mossad.
According to Iranian Intelligence “the plan is to get into the military and civilian heart of the countries that are declared as a threat to Israel in order to destroy to facilitate thereafter, the takeover by the Zionist state on the entire area of the Middle East in order to establish Greater Israel”. The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) is one of sixteen US military intelligence agencies. A leaked document obtained by Judicial Watch contains following information, the DIA wrote on 12th August, 2012 that: “there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria, and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime”.
It should be noted here that this was written before ISIS came on to the world stage. Clearly ISIS is a well-orchestrated controlled non-state group which is at the center of US-Israeli strategy of hybrid warfare in the Middle East. One of the empirical indicators is that ISIS has never attacked the state of Israel. Jerusalem throughout 1400 years history of Islam has remained at the center-stage in the Caliphate. Why ISIS never launched operations against the Zionist regime of Israel? The evidence suggests that ISIS is indeed an “Israel Secret Intelligence Service” which is using the “Kharijite Ideology” against the Muslim nation-states to complete its “Greater Israel Project”.
Islam and ISIS: Why ISIS does not represent Islam?
Islam denounces the evil ideology of terrorism and religious extremism and teaches the message of peace and religious tolerance. The Quran says that you wage war in response to aggression, but even when aggression is committed against you, you do not respond with warfare unless and until you have explored and exhausted all possible peaceful means of resolving the problem. That is real Islam which comes from Quran and Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H). Does ISIS talks about peaceful means? No, this is why ISIS does not and will never represent true Islam. When Muslims wage war against aggression, if the enemy is inclined to peace (which means giving up aggression) then Muslims must also reciprocate and incline to peace. Does ISIS incline to peace? No, thus ISIS does not represent Islam and Muslims. They are the ones who are spreading terrorism around the globe. So who are these people if they do not represent Islam and Muslims? Are they even Muslims or part of Islam? What has Islam to say on the issue of terrorism?
Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) has referred to them as Kharijites (foreign to Islam). They have existed since the very early period of Islam and they will continue to cause strife in the Muslim nation and the rest of the world until the end of time when they will join forces with the False Messiah (Al-dajjāl or Anti-Christ in Christianity). True Muslims have mercy upon the entire creation, including unbelievers and idolaters, but the Kharijites have no mercy for those outside their group. They declare other Muslims to be unbelievers by misinterpreting and misapplying the verses of the Quran. The Kharijites believe their opinions regarding leadership, government, politics, and the Sharia are the only valid opinions in Islam and whoever disagrees with them becomes an unbeliever. But the truth is that right to “Jihad Bil Saif (sword)” is in the hands of the national armies of the Muslim nation-states and not the non-state actors.
ISIS-K: The Kharijites of Khorasan
The official position of Pakistan on ISIS is plain and clear; there is no footprint of ISIS in Pakistan. But why is ISIS claiming responsibility for terrorist attacks inside Pakistan? Firstly, Pakistan’s threat analysis since 2001 clearly suggests that US global war on terror is a hoax. In reality, it is a modern war against the Muslim world which is aimed at redrawing the map of the Greater Middle East to enhance the security of the state of Israel. Pakistan is the only Muslim country that possesses nuclear weapons and can deter the state of Israel. Thus, the denuclearization of Pakistan through fifth generation warfare is essential for Israel. Interestingly, five years ago on May, 2014 Obama announced that US military operations in Afghanistan would end in December, 2014. Pakistan’s threat analysis was clearly suggesting that this decision was merely for show and if they really withdrew from Afghanistan then they would replace their army with mercenaries to continue subversion against the Afghan Taliban and against Pakistan.
Secondly, it is to the credit of Pakistan’s armed forces and intelligence agencies that mercenaries such as “Tahreek-e-Taliban Pakistan” (TTP) and its inner and outer circles were completely thwarted through intelligence based operations. But the United States, India and Israel through their rogue intelligence agencies have sinfully re-branded TTP as ISIS-K to continue their strategy of hybrid war against Afghan Taliban and Pakistan. Pakistan’s leading defense analyst Zaid Hamid has recently speculated that “Abu Bakar Al-Baghdadi might be in Afghanistan already” which is an alarming situation for the security of Pakistan. There are plausible explanations for this phenomenon as there are reports on how mercenaries and weapons from Iraq and Syria were transported to Afghanistan through US coalition mystery helicopters.
Thirdly, ISIS is using “ISIS-K” acronym, now what does “K” represents? It represents “Khorasan”. Khorasan was the territory which during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) comprised what we today know as Afghanistan, Pakistan (excluding Punjab and Sindh provinces) and Northern Iran. This territory was identified through a research which was conducted by Pakistan’s eminent Islamic scholar Dr. Israr Ahmed. ISIS-K is claiming that in an attempt to restore Khorasan province for its Caliphate they are declaring Afghanistan and Pakistan regimes as “Murtids” (non-Muslims) and it is a religious obligation to wage war against these nation-states. The endgame of ISIS-K is to weaken the Afghan Taliban through guerilla warfare and launch operations against Pakistan from Afghanistan.
ISIS-H: The Kharijites of Hind
India has been using the US-Israeli global model of war on terror since 2001 in Kashmir. The strategy was to frame the efforts of Kashmiri freedom fighters” as “terrorism”. Now with the rise of Hinduvta mission and the quest of RSS, BJP and Bajrang Dal (etc.) to restore their former territories of Akhand Bharat (Hind) (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kashmir, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives etc.) they have launched this project in South Asia. The author, Sabtain Ahmed Dar wrote an investigative report on the “Sri Lanka Bombings” in which hundreds of innocent Christians were killed. This article concluded that India was involved in the attack and through this false flag has officially launched its Hinduvta project in South Asia by using US-Israel’s global model of war on terror to frame Muslims as terrorists. India will continue to use its proxies such as TTP and rebrand it as “ISIS-H” (H for Hind) to create more false flags inside India to continue the war against Islam and Pakistan—just as they have rebranded TTP in Afghanistan as ISIS-K to fight the Afghan Taliban.
Pakistan and the Next Three Years
Firstly, the US Army and its coalition are already in Afghanistan, and its Navy in the Persian Gulf, to threaten Iran, while the Indian navy is already patrolling around in the Arabian Sea. Pakistan cannot afford to take sides in the conflict between Iran and US. This may actually turn out to be a set up against Pakistan, because if Pakistan choose to side with Iran, it will provide a chance for its adversaries to threaten Pakistan. Pakistan should remain neutral in all conflicts led by the US-Israel axis in the Muslim world to prevent ethno-sectarian conflicts.
Secondly, Pakistan’s strategists have only engaged China in the economic domain. It is my assessment that if they allow Chinese military or naval bases in Pakistan it will open new chapters of conflict between Pakistan and US. And in case of any military confrontation between China and United States, Pakistan is likely to become “the Poland of South Asia” in between the capitalists and the communists. Pakistan’s policy makers should also ask: does Pakistan trust “Communist China” in a war?
Thirdly, a military intervention by Russia inside Afghanistan could also prove to be a disaster for Pakistan’s foreign policy towards Afghanistan. Why? It would allow the United States and its coalition to perpetuate its operations inside Afghanistan. A recent report says “an ISIS offshoot has amassed around 5,000 militants in northern Afghanistan on the border of post-Soviet republics of Central Asia”. It is highly likely that the US through its proxy warfare is trying to bluff Russian military intervention inside Afghanistan for the second time in the history. The plan is plain and clear, the Zionists want to make Afghanistan “the Syria of South Asia”.
Fourthly, there will no peace in South Asia as long as India and its proxies are active in Afghanistan. In order to defeat India in Afghanistan, Pakistan must officially recognize the reality of the Afghan Taliban. The Afghan Taliban is the only force that can crush India inside Afghanistan.
Fifthly, Pakistan needs to eliminate anti-state and foreign funded movements such as Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM). My threat analysis is clearly suggesting that in the future ISIS-K will try to form a political alliance with PTM secretly to support its terrorist operations against the Pakistan Army in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Thus, there is a high possibility that ISIS-K may become PTM’s military wing in the coming weeks.
Lastly, there is a threat to the freedom of movement of Kashmiris because RAW is rebranding the national movement of Kashmiri freedom fighters as the “Kharijite Movement”. This is the prime reason they have launched ISIS-H project inside South Asia. Similarly, RAW backed ISIS-H is likely to be used against the Sikhs in Punjab to destroy the Khalistan Movement by framing Muslims and Pakistanis as terrorists. The same model can be applied to Maoists, Naxalites and Tamils to protect the national interests of India. Pakistan needs to support the national movements and eliminate all Kharijite movements to balance the hybrid war against India.
If ISIS is not crushed in Afghanistan it will turn Muslims into rebels against the writ of their respective nation-states. This is exactly what Israel has desired for two decades. This hybrid strategy will simultaneously serve the CIA-Mossad nexus for the greater Israel project in the Middle East and RAW for its Hinduvta project in the South Asia. Thus, Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan are standing at the crossroads of their history and great trials are ahead among them. A policy tightly knit with political, diplomatic and military wisdom is required if Pakistan wants to save the current map of South Asia.
Sabtain Ahmed Dar is currently doing M.Phil. in International Relations from the department of Political Science, Punjab University, Pakistan. He specializes in Pakistan affairs and geopolitics, specifically the US strategy in the Middle East and South Asia.
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.
He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS, and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin; where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.