Wikileaks was invented to support Roy Cohn’s ‘gayboy’ lovers that the Kosher Nostra put into the White House. This is the simple truth of it and Cohn is still somewhere laughing his ass off as the US is torn apart by a second acolyte of Cohn’s, another bumbling moron in a dress…
VT: Wikileaks is the listed source for the US/UK invasion of Iraq in 2003. Wikileaks is the source for current US policy on Iran. Wikileaks is the source behind the US bombing war on Yemen, the real war, a secret one.
In fact, every fake terror war, every color revolution for the past two decades has, to some degree, depended on the US of fake intelligence fabricated by Israel and released through Wikileaks and Israeli agent Julian Assange.
We have learned today that Trump is negotiating with Assange, trading a pardon for fabricated material on Biden being prepared for Wikileaks by Trump’s Israeli masters.
Below is the true story of Wikileaks going back many years, tying them to the Mossad and CIA and proving, as VT did years ago, that Wikileaks and everything about it is fake.
We begin with the Bush era and move onward, in this decade ago study that unleashed the ADL, Wikipedia and AIPAC on VT. We laughed then but, as Assange helped put Trump, a ‘dime store Hitler,’ in office, the damage is done and America is in ruins.
No one listened. No one listened when they nuked Beirut. They are far from finished with us.
*
THE “WIKI-WEASEL” VINDICATES BUSH, WAR, TORTURE AND…?
“Wikileaks is a big and dangerous US intelligence Con Job which will likely be used to police the Internet”….F. William Engdahl
“Supporting WikiLeaks founder, Julius Assange and..calling for revolution due to government cover-ups are intended results of a counterintelligence reverse tactic”…Bob Levin, FBI whistleblower
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
I can only say one word, flabbergasted. When I got the article by Larry Elder, a journalist who is known for finding the real story behind the story, I nearly dropped. The recent release of diplomatic cables, described by former National Security Advisor Zbiegnew Brzezinski as “seeded” with “pointed” facts to “favor an agenda” by an “intelligence agency” clearly restores long discredited George “W” Bush to a place of honor.
“Bush, hammered by the insidious “Bush Lied, People Died” mantra, endured one of the most vicious smears against any president in history. He is owed an apology.
When Hollywood makes ‘The Vindication of George W. Bush,’ maybe Sean Penn can play the lead.”
Bush, assaulted on all sides, his book tours besieged by protests, a president who left office with a country reeling in debt, losing two wars and now with his former vice president, Dick Cheney, indicted for bribery, is a hard sell as a hero. Before this, Wikileaks championed the war on Iraq and its planned expansion into Iran, a continuing theme, as Brzezinski points out, always the “point” of Wikileaks, war on Iran. Everything always goes there. “Hello, how’s your mom, wasn’t that an Iranian I saw sneaking into her garage…?”
WIKILEAKS IS A BROKEN RECORD
Larry Elder isn’t lying. Wikileaks is clearly trying, so very hard, to vindicate Bush and prove Saddam had a nuclear program, something proven dead wrong before 9/11, proven dead wrong in 2003 and in every other source on earth other than Wikileaks, long accepted as always “dead wrong.” Isn’t the fact that the “sexed up” intel on WMD’s was long proven dead wrong the reason for the Chilcott Inquiry in Britain? Hasn’t Tony Blair been assailed for years for having WMD (weapons of mass destruction) intelligence on Iraq “sexed up?”
Now that the death of Dr. David Kelly, the man who took Blair to task over this is now being looked at as a murder, one would think that trying to prove the utterly unproveable would be a hard sell. Wikileaks doesn’t think so. In fact, there is nothing Wikileaks doesn’t think it can’t do.
Elder scoured the Wikileaks “output” and makes a powerful case for the 2003 invasion. From his article at Townhall.com.
“The WikiLeaks de facto declassification of privileged material makes it case closed: Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction — and intended to restart his program once the heat was off.”
Elder then quotes Noah Schloctman, described as “a nonresident fellow at the liberal Brookings Institution” and editor of Wired Magazine. Wired, of course, is owned by Advance Publications, you know, The New Yorker, Tatler, Brides Magazine and dozens of very conservative newspapers. This is Noah Schloctman as quoted by Larry Elder as quoted by, oh, you get the picture;
“By late 2003, even the Bush White House’s staunchest defenders were starting to give up on the idea that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. But WikiLeaks’ newly-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction (emphasis added). … Chemical weapons, especially, did not vanish from the Iraqi battlefield. Remnants of Saddam’s toxic arsenal, largely destroyed after the Gulf War, remained. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict — and may have brewed up their own deadly agents.”
IRAQ WAR LOGS – WIKILEAKS VERSION
These are the seven reports that Elder, and, by proxy, Schloctman, are referring to as taken from the Iraq War Logs;
- 10th June 2006: Al Qaida in Iraq insurgents plan to attack a forward operating base in Karmah with chemical weapons…The insurgents plan to deploy their chemical weapon using mortars as a delivery system. (Analyst Comments: In Iraq AQI has tried several times to employ chemical weapons against coalition forces).
- 16th August 2008: CBRN personnel has tested the rounds twice with M8 paper and J CAM. EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal), and chemical recon element assess that the chemical … tested positive for chemical agent. EOD reports 12 x full chemical rounds. 14 x damaged rounds are either leaking or empty. The cache consisted of 26 contaminated rounds and 14 empty 155mm rounds.
- 13th October 2005: As of late September 2005, Al-Qa’ida in Iraq elements allegedly planned to attack Abu Ghurayb prison in early to mid-October using an unspecified number of mortars and car bombs…. AQIZ elements allegedly planned to use 20 “chemical munitions” brought from Syria.
- 28th January 2006: The ten are chemical weapons specialists and came to Iraq to support the chemical weapons operations of Hizballah Islam I. (Field comment — The chemical operations of Hizballah Islam I were previously reported as Al Qa’ida Iraq operations, the ten unidentified men are chemical weapons specialists from Syria)…The ten unidentified men were taken to Is’Hagey Iraq, where the unidentified chemicals weapons … are stored. The chemical weapons were brought from Syria to Iraq on 21 January 2006.
- 29th December 2006: As of 27 December 2006, three unidentified Bedouins who were alleged Iraq AQI Operatives planned to transport chemical munitions from Al Judayda, Saudi Arabia, to Nugra Al Salman District, a border area in Al Muthanna Province, Iraq …Subsequently, Iraq AQI operatives planned use the munitions to attack hospitals, outdoor markets, and US military forces in Al Basrah, Al Amarah and An Nasiriyah on or after 15 January 2007.
- 5th March 2007: AQI insurgency group is planning a rocket attack on several targets in the Baghdad International Zone and a US base in Al Rashdiyah by using Katusha rockets filled with unknown chemicals… these rockets were described as being three meters long and are modified in order to carry the extra weight. (Field Comment – the source was unable to provide the type of chemical and stated that these rockets probably originated from Iran).
- 20th September 2007: As of late September 2007, Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) militants in Mosul, Iraq were planning an imminent attack on Tall ‘Afar using rockets with Chlorine gas or another chemical compound … The rockets had a range of more than 20 Kilometers, and an impact radius of 50 to 100 square meters. (Comment: the Arabic word “Sarukh” was used to describe the rockets).
IRAQ WAR LOGS – REALITY VERSION
Let’s take a moment and examine these “Wikileak” reports that now are cited as vindicating President Bush, cited by many as reason for war on Iraq. Is there anything in them that would, perhaps, make them less than credible and even “sexed up” like the documents the Chilcott Inquiry is looking into now?
Taken from the above reports, we find the following curious uses of “weasel words.” June 10, 2006, we have “insurgents” but we know nothing but they are ‘planning” something they have “tried”but never done since, well, when did all this start? 1990? 30 years?
Then we are testing “rounds” we found on the ground somewhere. We test them twice. They are contaminated. Surprise, surprise. With areas of Iraq testing as having radiation levels 38 times higher than Hiroshima after a nuclear attack, it takes two tests to find “contamination. It gets even better, we move to January 28, 2006 and now manage to tie, not only Hizbollah and Iran but Syria as well, chemical weapons brought from Syria, to Iraq and stored but never used, never found. This is the purest form of “sexed up” phony intelligence, totally imaginary, Bush era baloney resurrected by Julian Assange. Nobody listened then but repackaged as a Wikileak, these hollow fabrications are now taken by some Journalists as “hard fact.”
On December 29, it gets better. Our informants are three unidentified Bedouins who were “alleged.” OK, we have to stop there, we have twoweasel wordsin one sentence. We have added another country to the Wikileaks “axis of evil,” Saudi Arabia. The embarrassing disclosures of the recent Wiki-dump, not only discredit the Saudi’s, showing them as allies of Israel, but might they also discredit this “Wikileaked” report as well?
March 5, more of the same. I feel like I am with Napoleon, walking back from Moscow in the snow, barefoot and hungry. This “Wikileak” tells us that rockets have “unknown chemicals,” weasel word number one and that they “probably” come from Iran. DONG! The “two weasel words in one sentence” bell has run again. My lunch contains unknown chemicals, “probably” from Iran.
Who wrote these reports? None of the incidents warned of ever happened. Some of the reports came from “private contractors” who were illegally tasked, according to the Department of Defense sources. “Private contractors” means “rent-a-cops.”
“Go ask those three guys with the camel if they know of any rockets from Iran that are carrying chlorine gas made in Saudi Arabia. While you are over there, get me some advice on my 401k, I am taking a beating in the bond market.”
WIKI-MECHANICS, VINDICATING BUSH OUT OF THIN AIR
US Army intelligence officers who authored some of the reports in Wikileaks reviewed their own work. They indicated that reports were missing, incomplete, some with major changes and many significantly altered.
Wikileaks didn’t write the article vindicating Bush, it only supplied, as Zbigniew Brzezinski call it, “pointed leaks seeded by an intelligence agency to serve a private agenda.” Our sources show those leaks, not only “seeded” but also falsified. This is how the Wikileaks story finishes and finally proves that Bush was right all along, how Wikileaks smashes, once and for all, everyone opposing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have killed untold numbers. From Larry Elder and his “Wikileak” article;
“The Associated Press called yellowcake “the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment” and said that it “also can be enriched for use in reactors and, at higher levels, nuclear weapons using sophisticated equipment.”
DONG! We just hit the “weasel word” jackpot of all time. Lets count them:
- “seed material” You could possibly, sort of, maybe, under some circumstances make something out of this that could hurt someone if enough of it fell on them.
- “higher grade” Weapons use 95% enriched uranium. Yellow cake is a form of processed ore. You can buy “yellow cake” for under $10 a pound (market price). By US Army standards for radiation hazards, “yellow cake” could be used as a food additive.
- “also can be” Read “was not.”
- “at higher levels” Read “were not”
- “using sophisticated equipment” Read “that did not”…..exist.
VINDICATION DOWN THE WIKI-ROAD, THE SLIPPERY SLOPE, AROUND “DEAD MAN’S CURVE” AND OVER THE CLIFF….
Larry Elder found what he wanted in Wikileaks. He wanted to save the tarnished reputation of George “W” Bush and Wikileaks was there. When Benjamin Netanyahu is accused of being a “genocidal war monger,” Wikileaks is to his rescue too. This is what Julian Assange had to say about Netanyahu as reported in the Israeli paper, Haaretz:
“Haaretz – WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Wednesday defended his disclosure of classified U.S. documents by singling out Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an example of a world leader who believes the publications will aid global diplomacy.
“We can see the Israeli Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu coming out with a very interesting statement that leaders should speak in public like they do in private whenever they can,” Assange told Time Magazine in an interview on Wednesday, days after his online whistleblower published thousands of secret diplomatic cables.
“He believes that the result of this publication, which makes the sentiments of many privately held beliefs public, are promising a pretty good [indecipherable] will lead to some kind of increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in relation to Iran,” Assange said.
“I just noticed today Iran has agreed to nuclear talks. Maybe that’s coincidence or maybe it’s coming out of this process, but it’s certainly not being canceled by this process,” he added.”
Many journalists have been unable to find this quote, particularly after stories tying Assange to meetings with Israeli officials in Geneva. Many, ignoring the experts, ignoring hard evidence, keep hanging onto the Assange myth, looking for ways to serve a personal agenda or revealing dark truths about their own allegiances.
The simple revelations in the Israeli press alone, should have been enough to warn the responsible members of the press they were being duped. Haaretz, an Israeli paper, make the accusations clear and shows how strongly were supported 8 days ago.
TURKEY “OUTS” WIKILEAKS DECEMBER 2
Haaretz also states:
“Also Wednesday, a senior Turkish official blamed Israel for the WikiLeaks release. Addressing reporters, Huseyin Celik, deputy leader of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s AKP party, hinted that Israel engineered the leak of hundreds of thousands of United States diplomatic cables as a plot to pressure the Turkish government.
“One has to look at which countries are pleased with these,” Celik was quoted as saying. ‘Israel is very pleased. Israel has been making statements for days, even before the release of these documents.’ Documents were released and they immediately said, ‘Israel will not suffer from this. ‘How did they know that?‘ Celik asked.”
SABROSKY OUTS WIKILEAKS
This is directly from a December 2, 2010 article in Haaretz, one of Israel’s largest newspapers, yet journalists around the world, not just Larry Elder, are investigating these charges that come from, not only Turkey but top American officials like Brzezinski or investigative journalists like Wayne Madsen or military experts like Dr. Alan Sabrosky;
“The one striking exception in all of this global tour de farce <sic.> is the Middle East. Certainly, even aside from Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s fulsome praise of Binyamin Netanyahu, what is said and what is not, represent the message Israel and its partisans in the US Government (itself heavily Zionist and “Israel First” in orientation) want the world to hear, believe and accept. The message coming across in the US diplomatic cables could have been designed and drafted by Avigdor Lieberman, and who knows? It may have been…
The other part of the covert theme is the apparent absence of anything tough on Israel, which means that anything of the sort is Top Secret or better, was excised from the cables that were released, or simply doesn’t matter at all to anyone in or out of the Middle East. The Arab nations for many years have feared a real nuclear threat from Israel, not a fabricated threat by Iran, but nothing like that comes across, despite 60-plus years of hostility from most to Israel and its ambitions.
Far more significant to me is the utter lack to date of scathing commentaries on Israel and its policies, leadership and actions from SOMEWHERE in the world. Even if Arab leaders felt there was no point in doing so with the Americans, most others would not feel so constrained. Something surely must have come to the attention of the US ambassadors to (e.g.) Turkey, South Africa, Brazil and Ireland, just to name a few of the many who have bitterly condemned Israel, and especially the disgusting duo of Netanyahu and Lieberman to say nothing of their predecessors, for what they have done to Palestine and the Lebanon; for Operation Cast Lead; for the settlements; for flagrant violations of UN Resolutions and the murder of UN officials; for Israel’s hostility to the Goldstone Report; for the blockade; for land expropriation; and for sheer thuggery and brutality.
But nothing like that is there, or at least has yet surfaced, which makes me increasingly inclined to see this as just another game of rhetorical smoke and mirrors, with a lot of real cables and real victims (like the poor US soldier who presumably gave Assange at least some of the cables), but with many or most of the Middle East cables “cooked” if not fabricated outright.
So these, at least, are probably the handiwork of Israeli-Americans or just Israelis putting their own spin on things, included in a mass of otherwise legitimate cables as camouflage and for validation. An Australian news website concluded that “[the] WikiLeaks cables [are] the 9/11 of world diplomacy.” Too, too true – same source, different vehicle and venue, all helping pave the road to yet another needless war in Israel’s service, this time against Iran. The gods weep — but not, presumably, Yahweh.”
BILL ENGDAHL’S STARTLING TAKE ON WIKILEAKS
Germany author and journalist F. William Engdahl sees the hand of the Mossad’s partner organization, the CIA in Wikileaks that and the very real threat against the internet, which Wikileaks, with its “ham handed” theatrics seems to be inadvertently supporting? Or is it inadvertent?
Engdahl on Wikileaks:
“The story on the surface makes for a script for a new Oliver Stone Hollywood thriller. A 39-year old Australian hacker holds the President of the United States and his State Department hostage to a gigantic cyber “leak,” unless the President leaves Julian Assange and his Wikileaks free to release hundreds of thousands of pages of sensitive US Government memos. A closer look at the details, so far carefully leaked by the most ultra-establishment of international media such as the New York Times, reveals a clear agenda. That agenda coincidentally serves to buttress the agenda of US geopolitics around the world from Iran to Russia to North Korea.
“Wikileaks is a big and dangerous US intelligence Con Job which will likely be used to police the Internet”….F. William Engdahl
But for anyone who has studied the craft of intelligence and of disinformation, a clear pattern emerges in the Wikileaks drama.
The focus is put on select US geopolitical targets, appearing as Hillary Clinton put it ‘to justify US sanctions against Iran.’ They claim North Korea with China’s granting of free passage to Korean ships despite US State Department pleas, send dangerous missiles to Iran. Saudi Arabia’s ailing King Abdullah reportedly called Iran’s President a Hitler.”
WIKILEAKS CITED BY FBI EXPERT AS PSYOP TARGETING THE UNITED STATES
Deborah Dupre in The Examiner, wrote on FBI whistleblower, Bob Levin’s impressions of Wikileaks;
“An FBI whistleblower has alerted that supporting WikiLeaks founder, Julius Assange and subsequently calling for revolution due to government cover-ups are intended results of a counterintelligence reverse tactic not in best interest of the public.
The recent operation on Somali and Nicaraguan youths that psychologically herded them into acts of terrorism need be a warning to Americans about PSYOPS master-minded so that innocent people are roped into actions against their best interest according to Levin. “I’ve trained agents to do this against criminal targets, but as we know, these agencies have increasingly been politicized like the Gestapo,” he stated.
Bob Levin, FBI targeted whistleblower since 2000, knows sophisticated counterintelligence tactics designed to manipulate the unwitting. Levin has lectured Special Agents in Training at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. He has been requested to brief Counterterrorism Taskforce Agents relating to his skill sets and investigative techniques. ‘My background was in codes and local, specialized state and federal law enforcement that ended in the FBI,’ Levin wrote to this writer in an email.
On December 8, Levin distributed an emailed alert using the following example posted by a WikiLeaks supporter:
‘People NEED to be supporting Julian Assange through this ridiculous time….Levin’s email warned about “FBI, CIA and NSA counterintelligence reverse tactics used to bait passionate persons into an actionable trap.'”
One can only praise Larry Elder. Who could have discredited Wikileaks as thoroughly? How many forgot the sins of earlier Wikileaks? Dr. Sabrosky gets it right when he says that Wikileaks look like they “could have been designed and drafted by Avigdor Lieberman, and…may have been…”
ADDENDUM
Lila Rajiva on Wikileaks:
August 2, 2010: “Google Wikileaks and count the number of responses you get that you can fit into the right-left binary…… Am I mistaken? In those first 20 pages [of a google search] I saw little or no substantial criticism of Wikileaks (anything beyond the left-right polarity I mentioned earlier).
Inflaming either of those poles could, I suspect, fuel the expansion of the war. I did see Chris Floyd’s piece way back, buried in the middle somewhere. I also saw a well-written Wired piece or two. Everywhere else, it was denunciations or defense from the mainstream media…. or uncritical acceptance from the alternative press. And I’m supposed to believe this huge buzz burying any kind of independent critical voice, largely emanating from the main outlets of financial aggrandisement and war-without-end…..or from foundation “activists”…… is, what, a victory for “the people”?”
June 27, 2010: “Assange objects to privacy. Wikileaks violates privacy. Kind of like Google, notice? Google thinks it’s heroic too and Google has its China-connection too.
Wikileaks makes anonymous sources, hacking, leaking, and ratting out your associates cool. It makes snitches heroes. Cui bono? Need I ask?
Corporate rivals, speculators and short-sellers, blackmailers, rival governments, spy agencies. Does that sound like the company the power-elites keep? So even if Wikileaks were not a disinformation agent, whose agenda would its work finally help?
A totalitarian outfits.
It certainly doesn’t help individualism. Ergo, whether Assange himself is a truth-teller, intel operative, visionary, grandstander, paranoid kook, hero, naif, villain, or anything else is beside the point. I can avoid wondering about his stuff with a clear conscience and can spend my energy putting posting material from the countless other reporters, bloggers, volunteers, activists, whistle-blowers and thinkers out there.
If he’s a decoy, I’ve saved myself a lot of trouble. And if he’s a hero, I would still have spent my time usefully. So no harm done. And ‘no harm done’ after all is the first thing we should care about even before we try to figure if blogging can do some good…”
ASSANGE LASHES OUT, PROMISES ISRAEL “LEAK”…IN 6 MONTHS
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
“We know what has been released. The genuinely sensitive material held by Wikileaks, that tying Israel to actions against America in Iraq, tying Israel to the drug trade in Afghanistan and tying Israel to terrorism in Pakistan, have yet to be seen. Will Assange be releasing these reports in 6 months? Why wait that long?”
Two Bedouins walk up to an Army checkpoint outside of Kirkuk. They ask for cigarettes. They are dirty, you can smell them 10 feet away. A young NCO eyes them carefully, fingering the safety on his M-4 carbine and responds. “You can have a pack but first you have to give us information.”
The Bedouins look at each other and smile.
“We just saw two, no ten Iranians swimming the Euphrates River. It looked like they had guns, no I think it was bombs, no, a big bomb, a dirty bomb I think I heard them say. They kept saying they were meeting their friends from Pakistan, no, I think it was Al Qaeda, no, now that I think of it, it was Al Qaeda from Pakistan, maybe bin Laden himself, yeah, that’s the ticket. They were taking nuclear weapons and meeting Usama bin Laden.”
The corporal, listening intently with a touch of skepticism looks the taller of the two in the eye and asks, “Where, exactly were they carrying these bombs again?”
The two Bedouins look at each other again, a smile spreads across their faces as they turn to the young soldier, “They had the bombs in their underwear, of course, where to you think terrorists keep such things?”
Another Wikileak is born…….
– – – – – – – – – – – –
Julian Assange has lashed out at the independent press for their attacks on the credibility of Wikileaks, particularly after revelations of his associations with, not only the New York Times and the powerful Murdoch media empire, both strong voices for Israel’s Zionist movement, but the Rothschilds family and even, strange as it may seem, billionaire George Soros.
While the mainstream media, now openly admitting their partnership with Wikileaks, has built Assange to “rock star” status, their reporting has systematically censored attacks on Wikileaks by, not only alternative media but governments as well.
Assange’s recent rages at the independent media are a clear indication of the declining status of mainstream press and television as reliable new sources. With 4 out of 5 seeking their news from the Internet and those looking for something other than sports, fashion and gossip, more likely than not moving increasingly toward the alternative press, Wikileaks, now practically a “brand name” for the New York Times and Fox/Murdoch group, is beginning to look, more and more, like a liability.
Attacks on Assange, citing his seeming pro-Israel bias, one he now openly admits also, soon began coming in from governments, Pakistan and Turkey, major allies of the United States, among others. However, the press never reported them or any of the other accusations of bias. While busily reporting on Assange’s sex life, a version now contradicted as to nature and preferences, the media left out the real heart of the Wikileaks controversy itself, its own role in Wikileaks.
If anything, the New York Times is guilty, not so much of espionage as reported by CBS News, but for misrepresenting their role in Wikileaks.
FILTERING THE UNFILTERED, THE PROPAGANDIZING OF WIKILEAKS
When Assange admitted that materials damaging to Israel were allowed to be removed from Wikileaks by outsiders, The New York Times and unnamed others, he failed to clarify the process used for adding material to Wikileaks. This process is called “seeding.”
When Brzezinski accused Assange of “seeding” Wikileaks with “pointed material” on behalf of an “intelligence agency,” this is the process he was referring to. It isn’t just that Wikileaks protects Israel but that material damaging to Israel’s enemies is now proven to have been chosen specifically.
This won’t be said enough times. When material was added and taken away to serve the purpose of powerful outside groups, in this case, all with powerful Israeli ties, it made Wikileaks an agent of censorship, an agent of propaganda and totally discredited the Wikileaks project.
Dr. Alan Sabrosky cites the following after his analysis of Wikileak material;
“The one striking exception in all of this global tour de farce <sic.> is the Middle East. Certainly, even aside from Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s fulsome praise of Binyamin Netanyahu, what is said and what is not, represent the message Israel and its partisans in the US Government (itself heavily Zionist and “Israel First” in orientation) want the world to hear, believe and accept. The message coming across in the US diplomatic cables could have been designed and drafted by Avigdor Lieberman, and who knows? It may have been…
No one knows how many groups were given censorship power by Assange or why or what materials were removed, and how embarrassing they would be to Israel. Were there materials on the attack on the Freedom Flotilla or the Goldstone Report? Were there reports on Mordecai Vanunu and Israel’s nuclear program?
Did Wikileaks suppress information on how Israel and India have armed Taliban terrorists for attacks inside Pakistan or, far more serious, reports that Israeli sniper teams and other groups, targeting American troops, did so in an attempt to blame Iran and push the United States to war with that nation. Are there reports of Israeli agents planning attacks on US forces in Bahrain in 2007, attacks meant to be blamed on Shiite terrorists allied to Iran? We are told there are and that these reports were removed and withheld.
WHAT WE GOT INSTEAD…
Instead of these reports, the public got these carefully selected and unsubstantiated items:
- 10th June 2006: Al Qaida in Iraq insurgents plan to attack a forward operating base in Karmah with chemical weapons…The insurgents plan to deploy their chemical weapon using mortars as a delivery system. (Analyst Comments: In Iraq AQI has tried several times to employ chemical weapons against coalition forces).
- 16th August 2008: CBRN personnel has tested the rounds twice with M8 paper and J CAM. EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal), and chemical recon element assess that the chemical … tested positive for chemical agent. EOD reports 12 x full chemical rounds. 14 x damaged rounds are either leaking or empty. The cache consisted of 26 contaminated rounds and 14 empty 155mm rounds.
- 13th October 2005: As of late September 2005, Al-Qa’ida in Iraq elements allegedly planned to attack Abu Ghurayb prison in early to mid-October using an unspecified number of mortars and car bombs…. AQIZ elements allegedly planned to use 20 “chemical munitions” brought from Syria.
- 28th January 2006: The ten are chemical weapons specialists and came to Iraq to support the chemical weapons operations of Hizballah Islam I. (Field comment — The chemical operations of Hizballah Islam I were previously reported as Al Qa’ida Iraq operations, the ten unidentified men are chemical weapons specialists from Syria)…The ten unidentified men were taken to Is’Hagey Iraq, where the unidentified chemicals weapons … are stored. The chemical weapons were brought from Syria to Iraq on 21 January 2006.
- 29th December 2006: As of 27 December 2006, three unidentified Bedouins who were alleged Iraq AQI Operatives planned to transport chemical munitions from Al Judayda, Saudi Arabia, to Nugra Al Salman District, a border area in Al Muthanna Province, Iraq …Subsequently, Iraq AQI operatives planned use the munitions to attack hospitals, outdoor markets, and US military forces in Al Basrah, Al Amarah and An Nasiriyah on or after 15 January 2007.
- 5th March 2007: AQI insurgency group is planning a rocket attack on several targets in the Baghdad International Zone and a US base in Al Rashdiyah by using Katusha rockets filled with unknown chemicals… these rockets were described as being three meters long and are modified in order to carry the extra weight. (Field Comment – the source was unable to provide the type of chemical and stated that these rockets probably originated from Iran).
- 20th September 2007: As of late September 2007, Islamic State of Iraq (ISI) militants in Mosul, Iraq were planning an imminent attack on Tall ‘Afar using rockets with Chlorine gas or another chemical compound … The rockets had a range of more than 20 Kilometers, and an impact radius of 50 to 100 square meters. (Comment: the Arabic word “Sarukh” was used to describe the rockets).
Upon closer examination, each of these reports was shown to be worthless, discarded or downgraded by the US government as “chickenfeed.” The proposed attacks all never happened, the weapons spoken of were never found or used, in fact, the Iraq War Logs were a litany of failure. However, when the press, now shown to have selected the “leaks” in the first place, wrote about their own work, what was “chickenfeed” was spun into powerful accusations, all false, fanciful and reprehensible.
We know what has been released. The genuinely sensitive material held by Wikileaks, that tying Israel to actions against America in Iraq, tying Israel to the drug trade in Afghanistan and tying Israel to terrorism in Pakistan, have yet to be seen. Will Assange be releasing these reports in 6 months? Why wait that long?
PRO-WAR, ANTI-WAR, WILL THE REAL WIKILEAKS PLEASE STAND UP
Assange is pro-war, Assange is a strong “neocon” supporter, Assange has supported Bush administration policies in every way from the mishandling of the 9/11 investigation to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. In fact, Assange was totally pro-American until the Obama administration began pushing for an end to the forced removal of Palestinians by Israel.
Lila Rajiva, writing for VT, cited Stewart Bramhill:
So what is the corporate media trying to conceal by beating Assange’s sex life to death?
Most of the information in the recent cables release is already widely available on the Internet.
At the same time I find it surprising to find absolutely nothing about the “strategic” reasons the US is at war in Pakistan and Afghanistan.Nothing about the Pentagon agenda to foster the secession of oil and mineral rich Balochistan from Pakistan as a US client state – just like Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and other former Soviet republics. Nothing about CIA support for the Baloch separatist movement. Nothing about the CIA training young Baloch separatists in bomb making and other terrorist activities to disrupt operations at the Chinese-built Gwadar Port (intended to transport Iranian oil and natural gas via Pakistan to China).
The latest Wikileak has been out a for a month, actually much longer if you are the New York Times or the government of Israel. They had it all from day one. With the US government threatening Julian Assange with prosecution for holding and releasing illegally obtained classified material, why aren’t they going after the real Wikileaks, the New York Times? It only took Zbigniew Brzezinski, Washington’s “establishment” foreign policy expert, a “New York minute” to spot Wikileaks as an intelligence operation, when he informed PBS interviewer Judy Woodruff of this on December 2.
This story wasn’t new. The worst part is that the story was well documented from the first, long ago, but suppressed in the press, now long proven totally complicit, not in choosing what Wikileaks stories to print, but in choosing what Wikileaks intelligence was released to the public. This is what it all comes down to.
WIKILEAKS IS A “PRESS RELEASE,” AND HARDLY A “LEAK” AT ALL
Julian Assange, for some unknown reason, placed full authority for what the public could and couldn’t be trusted with in the hands of the New York Times. Wasn’t Wikileaks set up to attack the press in the first place? Wasn’t it Wikileaks that was telling us, from day one, that the governments were controlling the press, censoring the news and supporting wars?
The whole purpose of Wikileaks was to eliminate and bypass the cabal of corrupt government and controlled press, to empower citizens with real information that was withheld. Instead, Wikileaks became just another government controlled newspaper, and Julian Assange got his daily press conferences, his staged photo shoots and his endless fame, all while covering his complicity in censorship and his relationships with the world’s most powerful and often reviled forces, all advocates of war.
With all the hoopla about opposing war, the majority of Wikileaks documents, certainly the most “pointed” and “seeded” of them, as Brzezinski tells us, are all in support of the wars Julian Assange said he opposed. Other than minor reports outlining the idiocy of the people who wrote the reports, cables or whatever we want to call them, other than proving American diplomats and intelligence officers are typically dupes and clowns, something a decade of war and lies has proven to the world long ago, what, exactly, has Wikileaks done?
Dr. Alan Sabrosky sums it up far better than I could ever do;
But nothing like that is there, or at least has yet surfaced, which makes me increasingly inclined to see this as just another game of rhetorical smoke and mirrors, with a lot of real cables and real victims (like the poor US soldier who presumably gave Assange at least some of the cables), but with many or most of the Middle East cables “cooked” if not fabricated outright.
So these, at least, are probably the handiwork of Israeli-Americans or just Israelis putting their own spin on things, included in a mass of otherwise legitimate cables as camouflage and for validation. An Australian news website concluded that “[the] WikiLeaks cables [are] the 9/11 of world diplomacy.” Too, too true – same source, different vehicle and venue, all helping pave the road to yet another needless war in Israel’s service, this time against Iran. The gods weep — but not, presumably, Yahweh.”
VETERANS TODAY, WITH PERMISSION FROM JONATHAN AZAZIAH, INCLUDES HIS ANALYSIS OF WIKILEAKS:
Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth
by Jonathan Azaziah for www.maskofzion.com and VT
Not since Zionist warmonger Barack Obama’s ‘ascension’ to the US presidency, has there been such a hysteria in the anti-war/anti-Zionist community as there is with Julian Assange and his organization, Wikileaks. Just like Obama, whose smooth-talker persona duped millions of awakened individuals, lulling them into a false sense of security with lies and trickery, Wikileaks has pulled the wool over the eyes of average people and distinguished activists and writers alike with its ‘whistleblower’ image.
Even after Obama’s Zionist roots were exposed, in which powerful pro-Israel figures like Abner Mikva, Joel Sprayregen, Newton Minow, Bettylu Saltzman of the dynastic Saltzman family, Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, Lester Crown of the vastly wealthy Crown household and Penny Pritzker of the Pritzker dynasty nurtured his rise to political stardom in Chicago (1), the current puppet of the Zionist entity was no less supported and no less loved by his starry-eyed followers.
After Obama was designated the democratic ‘candidate’ for president, he delivered a speech at AIPAC and announced to his masters that the United States has an ‘unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security (2).’ Still, the opinions of his followers remained unchanged. And not even after Obama maintained utter silence during Operation Cast Lead (3), in which the usurping Tel Aviv regime murdered 1,440 innocent Palestinians in illegally besieged and occupied Gaza, including 431 children, did his legions of drones realize that the slogans of hope and change they so vehemently believed in, were really just smoke and mirrors.
Only recently, due to Obama spreading the Zionist Bush administration’s ‘Project for a New American Century’ to Yemen, expanding the murderous drone strikes in Pakistan, as well as increasing the genocides in occupied Iraq and occupied Afghanistan, have some of his once seemingly mind-controlled supporters snapped out of their trance. Plenty of them still continue their blindness however.
Assange and Wikileaks make the Zionist-fueled Obama hype look minuscule; like rain drops in an ocean. Wikileaks, touted and fully endorsed by the Zionist media, has become the peak of resistance and dissidence. The greatest whistleblower in the history of whistleblowing. Assange has been elevated to god status, eclipsing rock stars and movie stars. Wikileaks cannot be questioned. Assange cannot be investigated. Everything the organization does is for the good of the people, and everything Assange says is absolute 100% fact.
Though it may come as a shock to those who have bought into the absurdity of Wikileaks, everything aforementioned is a morbid delusion. Wikileaks is no whistleblower. Assange is no hero. And the leaks, which have been hailed across the globe, aren’t even leaks. Wikileaks isn’t just toxic Zionist poison, it is a full-blown US-Zionist intelligence operation.
Israeli Foreknowledge and Arrogance
One day after the World Trade Center was demolished with military-grade thermite explosives, mass murderer of Gaza Benjamin Netanyahu told the Zionist-owned New York Times that the 9/11 attacks were ‘very good’ for US-Israeli relations, and that they would generate immediate sympathy for the Zionist entity (4). One year after Netanyahu made these audacious declarations, he delivered a speech to the US House of Representatives, laying out reasons why the obliteration of Iraq is necessary for the survival of Israel (5). In 2008, the Zionist war criminal delivered a speech to an Israeli university, reiterating his comments about the Mossad false flag on 9/11, as well as stating that his regime is benefitting from the ‘American struggle in Iraq (6).’As recent as July of this year, Netanyahu has publicly declared that any withdrawal from Iraq will leave the Tel Aviv regime vulnerable to ‘renewed hostilities (7).’
Netanyahu continued this pattern of arrogant behavior with Wikileaks, by revealing that the usurping entity had prior knowledge to the organization’s upcoming leaks on the day that ‘Cablegate’ began, just hours before the release (8). Netanyahu stated that the Zionist entity wouldn’t be the ‘center of international attention.’ The following day, Netanyahu reaffirmed this revelation by stating that Israel ‘wasn’t harmed at all;’ a senior official in his Zionist administration also said that ‘we come out looking very good (9).’
On the same day, former national security advisors to butcher of Lebanon Ehud Olmert and Sabra and Shatilah massacre architect Ariel Sharon boasted that ‘Israel benefits from these leaks (10).’ Israel’s Finance Minister, Yuval Steinitz, when asked about the leaks on Israel Radio, said that he ‘doesn’t see damage. Quite the opposite (11).’ Israeli mouthpiece newspapers emboldened the statements of their murderous leaders, with one opining that ‘had Wikileaks not existed, Israel would have had to invent it (12).’ This statement in particular will prove not only to be devilishly ironic, but another example of Israeli foreknowledge.
While nations all over the world, nations of Resistance and nations of oppression alike, scrambled to defend themselves from the Wikileaks onslaught, several officials of the illegitimate Zionist state, including the prime minister himself, openly affirmed the impregnableness of Israel. No damage, a bounty of satisfaction and a plethora of benefits. The questions are simple: If the Zionist entity isn’t behind Wikileaks, how did its officials know it wouldn’t become the subject of international media scrutiny? If Wikileaks wasn’t protecting the Zionist agenda, why would Israeli officials intransigently say their illegal occupying entity remained unharmed after the leaks? And if in fact Israel is operating Wikileaks, then the Zionist media’s depictions of Assange and his crew as whistleblowers are monstrously false, aren’t they? Logic and common sense should guide all to the blatant, blue and white six-pointed-star-shaped answers.
Red Mafiya Don Semion Mogilevich is left out of Cablegate deliberately. |
Cablegate Fraud I: The Obviousness
Like the Afghan War Diary and the Iraq War Logs which mixed Zionist hasbara with facts about American and British war crimes, Wikileaks’ Cablegate documents mix truths with Zionist lies to maximize the potential of the disinformation campaign. And like the previous leaks, the truths that are released are examples that were revealed and reported on by activists and journalists alike long before Wikileaks was relentlessly and aggressively force-fed to the masses by the Zionist media.
Included are shockers like Israel attempted to coordinate its Operation Cast Lead assault on illegally blockaded Gaza with traitorous Palestinian collaborationist Mahmoud Abbas and the brutal Zionist dictator of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak (13). Revelations like Ali Abdullah Saleh, US-Saudi puppet president of Yemen, covered up US air strikes that murdered children (14). Discoveries like the US is waging a ‘secret’ war inside Pakistan (15). Eye-openers like a Lebanese official offering advice to the Zionist entity on how to trample the Lebanese Resistance movement, Hezbollah (16), or the US flying spy missions over Lebanon from its Diego Garcia base (17). Or quite possibly the largest and most apocalyptic divulgement: the Israeli mafia exists prominently within the illegitimate usurping entity, and is a very, very dangerous group (18). How incredibly overwhelming. The name of Assange’s putrid organization should be Wikiobviousness, not Wikileaks.
Mahmoud Abbas has been exposed over and over again as a treasonist to the Palestinian people since he became an integral part of Middle Eastern politics, or more accurately, the Zionist Power Configuration. Since 2005, Abbas’s Palestinian ‘Authority’ has been cooperating with the Zionist entity through ‘security coordination (19),’ which links the two illegitimate powers to a crackdown on all elements that support Resistance to Zionism. Despite denial after denial by Abbas himself and his spokespersons, he finally admitted to this filthy collaboration in March of this year (20).
Israel and Mubarak’s regime have transferred weapons to Abbas, and the US has given Fatah hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to undermine Palestinian Resistance, chiefly Hamas, and to strengthen the Zionist stranglehold on occupied Palestine (21). Mahmoud Abbas has deep financial ties to Tel Aviv, which also amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars given to Fatah by the Israeli government yearly (22). Wikileaks wasn’t needed for this; anyone that is simply capable of reading is well-aware that Abbas is a disgrace to the Palestinian people and a total puppet of the Zionist entity.
Ali Abdullah Saleh is a traitor to the Yemeni people; like Abbas, this has been known for decades. He sold Yemen to the Anglo-American oil agenda, and then solidified the sellout by entering into billion dollar slave-agreements with the Zionist-infested World Bank and IMF (23). Saleh is a habitual recipient of the American oppressor’s aid money (24), and as of January of this year, he’s been receiving this blood money on an even greater scale (25). He has used these funds along with money from the House of Saud to wage a brutal war against the Resistance of southern Yemen (26).
The US dropped cluster bombs on Yemen in December of 2009, and it was well reported in the alternative media sphere; this murderous attack claimed the lives of 120 innocents and wounded 40 others (27), not 41 as Assange’s organization erroneously reports. Telling the world that American bombs kill civilians is like telling someone that the sky is blue or that the sun is hot. There was no need for ‘whistleblowing’ on this matter.
Yemen is Zion’s newest target; sickeningly pro-Israel war criminal Joe Lieberman called for preemptive strikes against the Arab nation last year in late December (28), and Obama’s Zionist administration obliged by increasing its illegal military presence inside the country (29).
Despite wide-ranged reporting in the Zionist media and the anti-Zionist media, Ali Abdullah Saleh continued his role as a stooge, and denied the presence of America inside Yemen (30). Now, Obama and his gang of criminals have set forth a plan for an even larger military mobilization which will be followed by an occupation (31).
In addition, Mossad is carrying out assassinations and other terrorist operations against the Yemeni Resistance in the south (32). Don’t expect to see any of this information in the Cablegate documents though; Wikileaks must protect Israel at all costs.
The CIA has been conducting a war with its murderous predator drones against Pakistan since 2004 (33), and it has been doing so from Pakistani bases thanks to one criminal administration after another (34). 90% of the people murdered by these CIA drones are civilians (35), and these attacks occur close to every single day (36). It was reported in 2008 (37), and in February of 2010 (38), that US Special Forces were engaging in terrorism on the ground in Pakistan. Wikileaks didn’t ‘reveal’ anything about a ‘secret war’ inside the Islamic Republic; it stated a fact that could’ve been reiterated by anyone with a slight interest in geopolitics.
The real secret war against Pakistan is that which is being conducted by Israel and the Hindutva entity of India. Since the late 1980s, Zionism and Hindutva have signed military agreements and performed covert operations to destroy Pakistan’s nuclear program (39). In 2001, Mossad and RAW created four new agencies to target important personalities in the fields of law, defense, politics and religion, with the hopes of creating all out ‘sectarian’ chaos within Pakistan (40). Codenamed the ‘Dragon Policy,’ Mossad and RAW agents hired mercenaries, druglords and mafia figures to unleash the de-stabilization process (41).
Indian and Israeli intelligence have coordinated a string of car bombings with Xe (Blackwater) cells across the Islamic Republic (42), including the massive blast that claimed more than 100 lives in Peshawar, a Mossad stronghold (43), in 2009 (44).
Hezbollah Secretary General, his eminence, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, has never been bashful about exposing pro-Zionist politicians in Lebanon, with his most recent slashing of the collaborators taking place during a historic speech for Martyrs’ Day (45). While Elias al-Murr has denied the allegations set forth by the Wikileaks PSYOP (46), he is merely and pathetically attempting to save face; it is a well-known fact that the vile Fouad Siniora government (which al-Murr was a part of) tried to disarm Hezbollah and disconnect the Resistance’s telecommunications network on behalf of the Zionist regime and the US (47). Siniora and his goons failed miserably as Hezbollah persevered and triumphed.
It is also a well known fact that the US conducts spying and military operations, primarily against occupied Iraq and the Islamic Republic of Iran (48), from Diego Garcia; the Indian Ocean territory turned into a military compound by British and American occupiers who have malevolently ethnically cleansed the entire indigenous population (49). On a side note, this evil of course isn’t mentioned by Wikileaks. The mentioning of a few previously known American spy missions in Lebanon is nothing more than a cover for the massive Zionist creature in the room: Israel is notorious for its spy missions in Lebanon, as it has violated Lebanese airspace well over 7,000 times since its crushing defeat at the hands of Hezbollah in the summer of 2006 (50).
Failing to mention Zionist activity in Lebanon is the equivalent of failing to mention the stars in the sky at nightfall. The Lebanese Resistance and the Lebanese Army have arrested at least 141 Israeli spies since April of last year (51), in the telecommunications, security and military sectors. The Zionist entity infiltrated Alfa, one of Lebanon’s two telecom companies, and used the penetrated network against Hezbollah in the 2006 war (52). Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah exposed the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri as a Mossad operation (53), and in an unsuspected but typical display of arrogance, Israel admitted to benefitting greatly from the murder (54). Tel Aviv had distanced itself from the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), which is backed by the US (55), as well as the UK (56), but the genocidal maniac Avigdor Lieberman finally confirmed what had been known in Lebanon since the Tribunal’s inception: Israel is heavily contributing to it (57).
The STL is not only a plot to eliminate Hezbollah, but to completely fragment Lebanon; it should come as no surprise then, that it was designed by Zionist Congressman Howard Berman and the powerful Israeli Lobby group, AIPAC (58). Sayyed Nasrallah uncovered that all of the information collected by the STL ends up in the hands of the usurping Zionist regime (59); it is essentially another Israeli spying operation. The Sayyed also revealed that Israel had not only penetrated Alfa, but all of Lebanon’s telecommunications; the Zionist regime is capable of cloning SIM cards, planting phone numbers, duplicating billing data and making phone calls without the phone-owner’s knowledge (60). Just days ago, Hezbollah telecommunications experts unearthed Israeli spying devices near the southern city of Tyre; when the Zionist entity’s cover was blown, the devices were detonated (61).
Not even an inkling of any of this information will be made readily available by treacherous Wikileaks because its purpose is to protect Israeli interests. And at the top of the list of those interests, is to colonize Lebanon, especially the south, as part of Greater Israel (62).
On the surface, it would seem that the revelations about the influence of Israeli organized crime (OC) within the Zionist settler state are groundbreaking; frightening and shocking even. But further analysis of the cable in question displays more of the same: a repetition of previously known information crossbred with odious lies to form a highly effective damage control operation. It was reported across the Middle East, as well as in Zionist-owned Western media that Israeli mob boss Yaakov Alperon was assassinated in 2008 (63), as was the intransigence of Israeli mafia stalwart Zeev Rosenstein, who was arrested in 2004 for the distribution of unfathomable amounts of ecstasy (64).
It was also already known that the new generation of Israeli gangsters were receiving training in the fields of assassination and ordnance during their service in IOF (65). These cases of obviousness however do not vindicate Wikileaks but condemn it in an even harsher manner due to the propaganda also contained within the cable.
The cable states ‘It is not entirely clear to what extent OC elements have penetrated the Israeli establishment and corrupt public officials.’ What an obscene falsification; since the 1980s, the Israeli mafia has exerted a gargantuan amount of control over the occupying government in Tel Aviv, coordinating this corruption from New York City and the streets of occupied Palestine (66). The cable also portrays Zionist war criminal Ehud Olmert in a positive light, saying that Olmert called emergency meetings in response to the public safety concerns and promised to add 1,000 officers to the current efforts ‘combating’ organized crime.
Another sham; Olmert is a criminal that is incessantly connected to the Israeli mafia (67). Olmert has been charged with corruption regarding Bank Leumi (68), whom notorious blood-diamond dealer Lev Leviev has a major stake in (69). Leviev is deeply connected to organized crime, due to his business ties with Russian-Israeli oligarch and mobster Roman Abramovich (70).
Quite possibly the most laughable excerpt of all in the entire cable is this statement: ‘Little is known about the full extent of Russian criminal activity in Israel.’ The Israeli mafia IS the Russian-Jewish mafia. The two cannot be separated; like the illegitimate Israeli state and Zionism. The cable also says Arab criminals routinely collaborate with Russian-Israeli crime families. This is erroneous; an attempt to divide the blame equally amongst Arabs and Israelis. The Red Mafiya (Russian Mob) is intensely racist and territorial, collaborating with no one but other Russian factions in their quest for criminal dominance. The Russian criminals not only poured into Israel after the Soviet Union was dissolved, they were invited by the Zionist entity’s government to start their lives anew (71).
The most powerful gangster in the world, and don of the Russian-Israeli mafia, Semion Mogilevich has his headquarters in Israel (72); his net worth is well over one billion dollars (73), wielding a criminal empire that involves human trafficking, drug dealing, arms peddling, nuclear materials smuggling and blood diamonds. Marat Balagula, another immensely powerful Russian-Jewish gangster made his home in the Zionist entity after leaving the Soviet Union. Balagula’s empire includes gas fraud, credit card fraud, and the usual elements of drugs, illegal weaponry and prostitution, along with ownership of diamond mines in Sierra Leone. Russian-Israeli organized crime, the Organizatsiya, cannot be talked about without mentioning these two prominent figures. It is no surprise that Wikileaks conveniently leaves their names out of the ‘leaks.’
Also left out of the cables is the most damning information about the Red Mafiya of all: unlike Italian-American mobsters, Russian-Jewish mobsters cannot be touched by US intelligence and local law enforcement, for fear of being hammered and character-assassinated by the Zionist lobby for exercising anti-Semitism (74).
The power of the Red Mafiya was exposed by the late Robert Friedman, a journalist who began investigating the Russian-Jewish criminal gang in 1989 (75), and who wrote a monumental book about their exploits more than a decade ago. His work brought the nonstop heat of Russian-Jewish OC on top of his head, receiving several threats by high-ranking gangsters (76).
Despite media reports of him dying of a rare disease he contracted while on an investigative mission in Bombay (Mumbai), all evidence points to the brave Mr. Friedman being poisoned by Mogilevich’s associates (77). Just like Assange, right?
The destruction of the Wikileaks cables in this section provides clear proof of what Assange’s group actually is: a ‘Limited Hang Out’ operation. Limited Hang Out ops are used by intelligence agencies to deliver well-known information to the public about government corruption and certain political crimes, satisfying their salivation for an expose of misdeeds while withholding the more critical, more secretive information (78).
Wikileaks doesn’t reveal; it rehashes. Former director of Mossad Efraim Halevy stated in an interview several years ago, ‘Not one big success of the Mossad has ever been made public (79).’ Wikileaks works diligently to keep it that way.
Cablegate is nothing but a promotion of Zionist propaganda. |
Cablegate Fraud II: Disgusting Zionist Lies
In a previous piece on Wikileaks, this author commented, ‘The other accusations sound like concoctions dug up from the dungeons of Zionist think tanks and lobby organizations salivating for the destruction of the Islamic Republic, not the work of whistle-blowers attempting to expose corruption and disseminate truth (80).’ This observation turned out to be a prognostication come true.
The cables aren’t really secret government documents. They are propaganda pieces written by Khazarian political officials and diplomats who have spent their lives serving the Israeli Lobby. Among them are US ambassadors to Turkey Eric Edelman and James Jeffrey, Deputy Secretary of State James B. Steinberg, US ambassador to Brazil Clifford Sobel, US charge d’affaires in Saudi Arabia Michael Gfoeller, Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Philip H. Gordon, career diplomat and current Special Envoy Daniel Fried and US ambassador to Canada David Jacobson (81).
This revelation explains why the newest docs from Wikileaks contain even more Zionist drivel than the last release.
The diplomatic cables claim that it was Hamas that broke the ceasefire that led to Operation Case Lead (82). They also brazenly claim that the Zionist entity has no assets in occupied Iraq (83). They insanely say that India has a huge stake in the facilitation of peace in occupied Kashmir (84). The cables belligerently claim that Syrians assassinated Lebanese Premier Saad Hariri’s father, former Premier Rafiq Hariri (85). There is more tiresome tripe about leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei, having terminal cancer (86).
There is another ridiculous claim that there is an Israeli weapons manufacturer in Haifa which is vital to US security interests (87). One cable disgustingly repeats the age-old Zionist propaganda about Israel attempting to minimize civilian casualties and Hamas using human shields (88). And arguably the most outlandish cable of all, Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi intimidated the British government into freeing wrongfully accused Abdelbaset Mohmed Ali al-Megrahi (89).
Claiming that the fighters of the Palestinian Resistance, whether it is Hamas or any other faction, use human shields, is a grotesque Zionist lie. There is no evidence on any level whatsoever; it is a nightmarish concoction of the hasbara squads that run the Zionist media. However, there is undeniable evidence that the Zionist entity’s occupation forces have used Palestinian human shields on numerous occasions; 15 times since 2005 began (90). Two IOF soldiers were ‘convicted’ in Israel’s kangaroo courts of using a 9-year boy as a human shield. The boy, Majid, will be scarred for the rest of his life for the horrific abuse he endured at the hands of IOF; the soldiers who abused him were demoted and given suspended sentences in an all too typical display of Zionist justice (91).
It is another aberration of the historical record to state that Hamas broke the ceasefire, when Hamas did not fire a single rocket into the territory occupied by Zion in the four months since the calm between occupied and occupier began (92). Tel Aviv discarded the cease-fire when it calculatingly murdered 6 Hamas officials in a raid on November 5, 2008 (93). When Hamas returned fire to defend itself and the people of occupied Gaza, the murderous Zionist entity had the pretext it needed to launch Operation Cast Lead, which had been planned years in advance by the upper echelons of the Israeli government, Mossad, Shin Bet and Aman {Israeli military intelligence} (94). Is there an organization outside of the media itself that spews Zionist propaganda better than Wikileaks?
Obviously, Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei isn’t dying of cancer; this absurd allegation has been repeated over and over through the years by several mainstream media outlets. It was reported in 2006 that the revolutionary leader was ‘dying of serious cancer and wouldn’t live much more than a year (95).’ In 2007, it was reported as fact that Sayyed Khamenei was dead from his ‘long battle’ with cancer (96). In 2009, foul Zionist Michael Ledeen wrote that the Ayatollah collapsed into a coma as a result of his cancer (97). It should be noted that Ledeen, who has close ties with AIPAC and Zionist war criminal Richard Perle (98), has been a driving force behind the idea that Iran is behind all of the chaos in occupied Iraq (99), which Wikileaks presented a strong case for in its propaganda-filled Iraq War Logs (100).
Taking into account that the diplomatic cables are in fact written by Zionists, the connection between Ledeen and Wikileaks isn’t all that surprising. This petty and childish claim about the Ayatollah having cancer is part of a broader psychological warfare operation to discredit, disunite and utterly humiliate the Islamic Republic. The Ayatollah’s ‘cancer’ can be placed in the trash alongside other nonsense like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Jewish roots and the Israeli star being engraved into several buildings in Tehran (101).
Not only has Saad Hariri himself already rejected the claims of Syria being behind his father’s brutal assassination (102), as mentioned in a previous section, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has provided hard evidence that the Zionist entity was the orchestrator of the former premier’s killing (103). All claims to the contrary are extensions of the Zionist campaign to destroy the Lebanese Resistance.
The Hindutva entity of India has been criminally occupying Kashmir for 63 years, how can such a regime have a ‘huge stake in facilitating peace?’ Since 1989, more than 100,000 innocents have been murdered, over 100,000 children were orphaned, over 22,000 women have been widowed, nearly 10,000 women have been raped, nearly 120,000 Kashmiris have been illegally detained and over 105,000 architectural structures have been razed by the occupying military (104). Mass graves have been found all over the occupied Valley (105). Military torture is common place in occupied Kashmir; sexual abuse, sleep deprivation, electrocution, beatings and stripping prisoners naked are only some of the acts of brutality that have been forced upon the people of Kashmir (106).
Not a single one of these ungodly crimes against humanity are mentioned by Wikileaks; the occupation itself isn’t even mentioned. Instead, Assange’s organization ‘vindicates’ the Hindutvadis by ‘revealing’ that the ISI coordinates terror attacks in occupied Afghanistan (107). More disgraceful Zionist propaganda. Indian officials have been almost as bold as the Zionist entity, stating that they are ‘not concerned’ about Wikileaks (108). Other officials have boasted that they are ‘not embarrassed’ by Cablegate (109).
India is the Zionist entity’s closest ally in Asia; the two racist regimes have collaborated in the occupation of Kashmir and spreading mayhem across Pakistan (110), and the fact that Hindutva isn’t concerned or embarrassed by so-called leaks of secret documents is beyond suspicious; it is collusive.
The theory that Israel is vital to American security, or that it is a satellite of the American ‘empire,’ is typical leftist rubbish to downplay the crimes of Zionism and Zionist power in the US. It is also contradictory to the facts. America doesn’t have a base in occupied Palestine, nor does it have any troops. It only stores minimal weaponry inside the Zionist entity, and this weaponry can be used by IOF at any time, without American permission.
Israeli bases cannot be used by the United States. No US puppet that borders the land that Zion stole from Palestine can conduct reconnaissance over Israel, let alone use Zionist bases for taking off. At times, especially after the preemptive war of 1973, Israel has undermined the relations between America and other Middle Eastern nations. And due to the chokehold that the Zionist Lobby has on the US government, whenever Israel is being attacked in the international community, America runs like a dog to defend its owner (111). There is no American ‘imperialism’ in Israel, although there is plenty of Zionism in America. Israel serves no interest but its own, manipulating any nation that it needs to, including the genocidal US, to accomplish the goals of international Zionism.
Apart from being another ugly Zionist falsehood, it is an insult to the intelligence of the people to postulate that Israel has no ‘assets’ in occupied Iraq. The sanctions against Iraq, the occupation and subsequent genocide were designed by a neoconservative cabal with dual loyalties to the illegitimate state of Israel (112). No official from this exclusive Zionist group has been harmed by the Wikileaks cables; not one. Mossad has agents stationed across Iraq from Mosul to Fallujah to Baghdad to Najaf to Karbala, wreaking havoc on the Iraqi people with Israeli-made IEDs and car bombs (113). In 2004, there were casualties everyday from made-in-Zion IEDs, and in 2005, three out of five Iraqis that were murdered met their end due to an IED (114).
Mossad operations continue to this very moment in Iraq, with the Israeli agency’s masterpiece being the animalistic display of savagery at Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral in Karada, Baghdad, which claimed the lives of 58 Iraqi Christians (115). Wikileaks has done an excellent job at convincing the world that Israel has nothing to do with the annihilation of Iraq; but Assange’s malicious smokescreen is as weak as a spider’s web when challenged with the indestructible blade of the truth.
If it wasn’t being presented as unquestionable gospel, the abominable claim that Muammar al-Gaddafi intimidated the British government into releasing Abdelbaset Mohmed Ali al-Megrahi would be exceedingly funny. The idea that Gaddafi, who was terrorized by Mossad throughout the 1980s (116), somehow bullied the British government, whose intelligence agency MI5 orchestrated the 7/7 terror attacks with Mossad (117), is a slander against al-Megrahi, whose life was ruined by the Lockerbie incident, and a deflection of evidence regarding who was really behind the attack. In fact, it was the British government intimidating and threatening Gaddafi (118). Al-Megrahi wasn’t released due to Libyan intimidation, he was released because he was innocent; there wasn’t a drop of evidence against him (119), and the Western conspiratorial charade couldn’t last any longer.
Lockerbie, like 7/7, 9/11, 26/11 and so many other recent ‘terrorist’ attacks blamed on Muslims, was a Mossad false flag intended to influence geopolitics to the detriment of Islamic nations (120). False flags, an Israeli speciality, haven’t just been ‘looked over’ by Wikileaks, they’ve been deliberately left out for the sole benefit of the repulsive Zionist entity.
The cables dissected here are only a drop in the bucket of hundreds of documents ‘released’ during Cablegate. The Zionist propaganda speaks for itself. It is shameful that so many have accepted this proverbial waste as if it were a holy declaration spoken by a prophet. Simply shameful.
Both of these nations have been assaulted by Wikileaks. |
Targeted by Zion: Turkey and Iran
Since Zionist commandoes barbarically executed 9 Turkish peace activists in international waters on May 31st of this year (121), the relationship between Turkey and Israel has become severely strained and entered into a realm of complication. On the positive side, amidst calls from its citizenry, Ankara has taken several steps to disconnect itself from Zionism. Turkish intelligence completely cut its ties with Mossad (122). Turkey also cancelled three extremely lucrative military exercises directly after the Freedom Flotilla massacre (123). Turkey has also continually voted against the illegal sanctions against Iran and signed joint energy agreements with the Islamic Republic and Brazil (124), much to the dispay and the ZOG in America and the Zionist entity itself. Prime Minister Erdogan also defended Hezbollah against the Zionist-designed STL in his recent visit to Lebanon (125).
On the negative side however, all of Prime Minister Erdogan’s harsh rhetoric against the Zionist regime (126), which he unleashed even while he was being threatened with Mossad assassination (127), has proven to be nothing more than just that: rhetoric. Throughout all of the condemning and slamming of Israel, Erdogan and other Turkish officials have continually called for an apology and compensation from the Zionist state, as recently as December 7th (128); as if an apology will undo the murder of 9 innocent peace activists. As if an apology will heal the pain of their families, or bring their killers to justice for crimes against humanity. Israel committed an act of war against Turkey, and Erdogan wants an apology? It extends beyond strangeness and becomes insanity.
Just days after the massacre, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu simplified everything by saying if Israel lifted the blockade against Gaza, Turkish-Israeli ties will ‘normalize.’ This normalization must also include the illegal 62-year occupation of Palestine, as well as the illegal occupations of Lebanese and Syrian lands, which Turkey has traditionally ignored while making $2.5 billion in imports and exports since 2000 via a free trade agreement with Tel Aviv (129). He also declared, ‘The security of Israeli diplomats and Israeli tourists is our nation’s honor. We will be making sure they are safe (130).’ The citizens of Turkey were murdered by Israel, and Davutoglu is concerned about the safety of the defenders of murder and illegal occupation? Shouldn’t his concern be with making his citizens safe, along with all those oppressed by Zionism? This politically correct square dance for the sake of pleasing Israel is absolutely revolting.
Disturbingly, while Erdogan showed solidarity with the Lebanese Resistance in his November trip to Lebanon, he also showed solidarity with Israel, unconscionably saying that when peace and security are restored in the region, Israel will ‘win from this peace (131).’ Odd would be an understatement for this remark. Israel is the reason for the lack of security and peace in the region. Israel is the oppressor, occupier, de-stabilizer, murderer, bomber, gangster, assassin, shooter and killer in the Middle East, from one end to the other. As long as this entity remains, peace will never be prospective. Zionism must end for peace to be a reality.
Furthermore, the most abhorrent part of Erdogan’s behavior is his atrocious denial of the Armenian Genocide (132), one of history’s greatest crimes in which the Young Turks movement systematically murdered 1.5 million innocent Armenians between 1915-1923. Erdogan made an even bigger fool out of himself when he preposterously claimed that Armenians ‘exterminated’ Turks (133). This continues the typical stance of all Turkish regimes, which have denied the Armenian Genocide for more than 90 years (134). The Armenian Genocide has always been an event attacked and denied by the Zionist media and Zionist lobby also, most notably the criminal ADL (135), due to the scarcely talked-about facts surrounding the perpetrators of it.
The Young Turks weren’t Turkish Muslims as it is widely accepted, but Zionists of ‘Jewish’ origin with direct connections to B’nai B’rith, Zionist bankers and the founder of Irgun himself, mass murderer Vladimir Jabotinsky (136). The man who the Zionist Young Turks brought to power (and who also partook in their savage activities), and who is credited with the secularization of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, was no more a Muslim than vile Zionist Hillary Clinton; he, like his brethren in the Young Turks, had ‘Jewish’ roots and was known for constantly reciting prayers from the racist, unholy Talmud and the xenophobic Kabbalah (137). Turkey denies this shocking truth as well, sticking to the Zionist lie which is promoted to cause division between Muslims and Christians.
The historical cover-up of the Zionist nature of Ataturk and the Young Turks is pertinent to the character of Erdogan, because he was once an opponent of Ataturk’s secular ideology, and spent time in a Turkish prison for ‘inciting religious hatred’ after reciting a poem with strong Islamic convictions (138). All of these anomalies, coupled with what comes after Wikileaks’ released cables, prove that Erdogan is nothing more than an opportunistic coward, and it is no wonder that Lebanon’s Armenian community courageously protested his visit to their country (139).
With Turkey, and Erdogan in particular, teetering on the brink of a radical foreign policy shift, in what would be a global game-changer, in comes Julian Assange and Wikileaks with yet another startling revelation: Turkey aided and abetted Al-Qaeda in occupied Iraq (140). Though Erdogan subsequently blasted the cables (141), he mentioned nothing about the undeniable fact that Al-Qaeda is a work of fiction (142), or that Israel is behind Wikileaks; he just barked and barked with his usual fiery rhetoric, and then kowtowed to Zionism when the power brokers in Tel Aviv called.
It is a direct result of the international embarrassment at the hands of Israel via Wikileaks’ Cablegate, that Erdogan sent Turkish helicopters to Israel and told Benjamin Netanyahu that Turkey will coordinate NATO relief efforts inside the Zionist entity when massive forest fires erupted (143). It is this Zionist smear campaign that is the reason why Turkey is now engaged in high-level talks with the Israeli regime to ‘mend’ its relations with Palestine’s occupier (144). And for what seemed impossible days after the Freedom Flotilla massacre, it is because of Cablegate that an official proposal has been drawn up for Israel to express regret for acting in self-defense and unintentionally killing the Turkish citizens aboard the Mavi Marmara, issue compensation to the families of the slain activists, while preventing prosecution of the IOF commandoes that carried out the murders (145). Justice, peace, solidarity and whatever little dignity Erdogan had, have gone out the window because of Wikileaks; proving that Turkey still is what it has been since the Zionist Young Turks obliterated the Ottoman Empire and exterminated 1.5 million innocent Armenians: an utter tool of Zionism. It is also evident that the calls of Huseyin Celik, a senior Turkish official who accused Israel of initiating the Cablegate ‘leak,’ have fallen upon deaf ears in Ankara (146).
Senior Israeli intelligence correspondent for Haaretz, Yossi Melman, recently wrote that Cablegate was the work of Mossad, and it was connected with several other recent events in the ongoing international Western intelligence campaign assaulting Iran (147). Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Wikileaks proves that the Zionist entity is ‘right’ on Iran, and that the entire Middle East is concerned about Iran’s ‘nuclear ambitions (148).’ This constant Israeli lordliness is a reflection of Cablegate eclipsing the Iraq War Logs in terms of the audacity of untruth about the Islamic Republic. Besides, what would a Wikileaks document dump be without Zionist propaganda against Iran?
The most talked about leaks have most certainly been those mentioning the leaders of the Gulf States expressing not just mere concern about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, but fierce encouragement of an attack on the Islamic Republic (149). There are also cables regarding the 2009 Iranian elections, which Wikileaks calls a ‘coup d’etat,’ and that the revolutionary nation ‘engineered’ Ahmadinejad’s victory (150). Other cables say that Iran has secretly purchased long-range missiles from North Korea (151). There are cables that say Iran is smuggling weapons out of Turkmenistan, in a violation of its neighbor’s sovereignty (152). And of course, there is no shortage on the propaganda regarding Iran aggressively pursing nuclear weapons (153), with one cable even suggesting that Pakistan is a ‘regional competitor (154).’
First and foremost, the 2009 Iranian elections were anything but stolen; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won by a landslide, attaining well over 60% of the votes submitted (155). There is not a single shred of evidence that Iran’s elections were ‘stolen,’ but there is overwhelming evidence that the US, inspired by the Israeli Lobby, spent hundreds of millions of dollars on programs that would de-stabilize Iran and facilitate regime change (156). The Zionist media sold the Western masses a cockamamie story about fraudulent elections based on unsubstantiated reports from Twitter (157), where Mossad agents have been conducting cyber warfare through hasbara since Operation Cast Lead (158).
This subject however, with all of the facts, has been thoroughly documented by many activists, writers and scholars. The objective of Cablegate was to assault Iran diplomatically, fracturing its ties with the Arab region, as well as to foment ‘sectarian’ tension between Sunni and Shia, Arab and Persian. This miserly Zionist plot has failed however, because regardless of the feelings of the corrupt, US-owned leaders of the Gulf States, 88% of the Arab citizens view Israel as the predominant threat in the region, 77% view America as the threat, while a minute 10% view Iran as a threat; there is also overwhelming support for Iran’s peaceful nuclear program (159). Ethnicity and religion are irrelevant; in defiance of US-Zionist efforts, Resistance will support Resistance always.
The attempted scheme to disrupt and destroy Iran’s diplomatic relations with the Arab world, especially as Iran works with Syria and Saudi Arabia for peace in Lebanon, efforts which Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has called ‘sincere (160),’ has also failed. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has slammed Wikileaks as psychological warfare; he further said that the information wasn’t leaked, but organized, and went on to say, ‘We are friends with the regional countries and mischievous acts will not affect relations (161).’ Iran’s Parliament Speaker, Ali Larijani said that the enemies of regional stability are behind Wikileaks and it is only an attempt to promote discord (162). Iran’s former Foreign Minister, Manouchehr Mottaki said the ‘questionable’ Wikileaks documents will not affect Iran’s brotherly and friendly relations with the Gulf States (163).
Cablegate opened up the gates for two significant events: new, stronger illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic by the United States (164), and another Mossad assassination of an Iranian scientist, Majid Shahriari (165). Jeffrey Goldberg, the Israeli-American journalist that spread horrific lies to promote the Zionist invasion of Iraq (166), used Cablegate to spread an even more ludicrous premise, that an Arab Lobby is supporting a war against Iran, and not a ‘Jewish’ Lobby (167). Zionist David Frum, Bush’s former speechwriter and loathsome war criminal, has also used Cablegate to justify an all-out military offensive against Iran (168).
It is troubling, that many in the ‘anti-war’ movement have ignored the Zionist fingerprints all over Wikileaks, and have stated that an American war against Iran will never happen; they have outlandishly stated that there is no evidence of such a war, and even more outlandishly, that Wikileaks has exposed Iranian support of American ‘imperialism.’
It is troubling, that it will take another Zionist-designed genocide to awaken such persons from their media-induced slumber. The war against Iran isn’t happening in the future, nor is it a fabrication; the US-Zionist war against Iran is taking place right now. And it has been for quite some time.The United States has surrounded the Islamic Republic with gunboats on numerous occasions, halted Iranian ships for arms shipments to the Resistance of Gaza, financed and educated Iranian ‘dissidents’ to bring about a pro-Western regime totally disconnected from the Islamic Revolution, kidnaped Iranian diplomats in occupied Iraq, kidnaped Iranian military personal on the Iranian border and then tortured them inside Iraq, continually spied on Iran and violated its sovereignty, attacked Iran’s currency and its international financial affairs, and funded ‘terrorist’ proxies to carry out murderous attacks on innocents within Iran (169).
The organization Jundullah, has waged barbaric warfare against the Islamic Republic, claiming thousands of lives; Jundullah is fully backed by the CIA and receives nearly $400 million a year from the US State Department (170). Mossad is also linked to Jundullah, providing training for the front operation, and coordinating several strikes against Iranian mosques (171). Ardeshire Hassanpour, a 44-year old Iranian nuclear scientist, was assassinated by Mossad in 2007 (172). Just days before the Cablegate release, Israel skyjacked an Iranian plane for the 130th time since 1984 (173). The Stuxnet computer virus, which originated in Israel (174), was unleashed on Iran’s industrial sector, including its nuclear power plant, by the Zionist entity in September of this year (175). Will this suffice as enough evidence of acts of war against Iran? Everything aforesaid is only part of the American-Israeli onslaught against the Islamic Revolution; to weaken it before the long-planned invasion and occupation.
Wikileaks, with extensive help from the Zionist media, has broken Turkey and deepened international Zionism’s war against Iran. Wikileaks’ largest success however, has been its coopting of the worldwide activist network, totally blinding it from seeing its function as the archer for every target that the Zionist entity considers an enemy.
Wikileaks is an Israeli-American intelligence operation. |
Wikileaks Exposed: The CIA, Google, PROMIS and More
Some authors and writers have suggested that an intelligence service may be behind Wikileaks, and others, like Pakistani Army General Mirza Aslam Beg have said outright that only CIA and Mossad could be behind such an operation (176). The General is spot on; Wikileaks has several connections to US intelligence, and these connections uncover several mysteries about Wikileaks, including who they are exactly and what exactly it is that they do.
Co-Founder of Wikileaks, John Young, whom Julian Assange calls Wikileaks’ spiritual godfather, left the organization in its early stages after labeling it a CIA operation for data-mining (177). Though Young has recently changed his position for one of support, the members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board confirm Young’s original suspicions. One of these members is security expert (and Wikileaks security designer) Ben Laurie (178), who is currently working on several projects for Google (179).
Google’s links to the intelligence community are vast; the internet giant has a security agreement with the NSA (180), the electronic surveillance organization responsible for spying on millions of Americans (181), a partnership with the CIA via its joint business venture with the agency’s investment wing, In-Q-Tel (182), in the purchase of an internet monitoring organization, Recorded Future (183), a working relationship with the Zionist Organization of America, profoundly linked to the Israeli military establishment (184), to fight anti-Semitism and ‘anti-Israel propaganda (185),’ and a disturbing research project in Tel Aviv, where Zionist founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page have major ties, to delve into the aspects of the human genome and genetic data-mining (186). The Google ties alone are enough to discredit and expose the entire Wikileaks operation.
Wikileaks is being heavily funded by Mossad and corrosive, criminal Zionist billionaire George Soros, and is also directly involved with a $20 million CIA operation involving Chinese ‘dissidents’ trained by the agency to hack into China’s computers and reroute the implanted viruses to American government computer systems, all for the purpose of increasing the cyber defense budget (187), a plan that began when dual-citizen of Israel and Mossad operative Amit Yoran was elected Cyber Security Czar by war criminal George W. Bush in 2003 (188). Amit Yoran and his family were a key part of the Mossad false attack on September 11th (189); just one more example of more than 60 years of Israeli espionage against the United States, including cyber warfare (190). Some of these ‘dissidents’ are Wang Dan, Xiao Qiang, and Wang Youcai, all members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board. This operation is an extension of the CIA’s ‘Operation Yellowbird,’ an earlier scheme in which the CIA supported the subversive activities of ‘pro-democracy’ Chinese citizens and rescued them from prosecution at the hands of the Chinese government (191).
Is there any mention of this CIA sabotage against China in any of the Cablegate documents? Obviously not. What about Zionist spying? Nowhere to be found. Instead, predictably, there are cables blaming China for espionage against the United States and Google (192); considering the security connections of Google with CIA, NSA and the Israeli military, this is beyond asinine. It is clear, that this is just more damage control to completely cover up the CIA-Wikileaks operation.
Another member of Wikileaks’ Advisory board is Tashi Namgyal Khamsitsang, former representative of the Dalai Lama and president of the Tibetan Association of Washington (193). George Soros is a major financial contributor to the Dalai Lama (194), the ‘spiritual’ leader of the Tibetan ‘struggle for independence.’
The Soros-founded International Crisis Group vociferously promotes the Tibetan cause, spreading falsehoods about Chinese ethnic cleansing and other concocted crimes against humanity (195). This is another Zionist-engineered farce to distract the masses from the real struggles of Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan. The Tibetan freedom movement has been funded by the CIA for decades through its National Endowment For Democracy (NDE) to weaken China’s social fabric; NDE was used by the agency to provide millions per year to its Asian clients, including $180,000.00 per year for the Dalai Lama himself (196). NDE is an integral part of none other than the CIA’s Operation Yellowbird (197). Any mention in the Cablegate documents of the CIA’s subversive connections to Tibet? Absolutely not; but there is plenty of sewage about China oppressing Tibet and restricting the Dalai Lama’s movements (198).
The remaining members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board are Phillip Adams and Francisco ‘Chico’ Whitaker Ferreira. Adams is a columnist for The Australian (199), a newspaper owned by News Corporation (200), the media conglomerate of infamous Zionist billionaire, Keith Rupert Murdoch, who recently accepted an award from the Zionist propaganda arm, the Anti-Defamation League (201). Ferreira worked as a researcher and consultant with UNESCO, and is currently a member of the World Future Council (202). The World Future Council is an organization dedicated to globalization via the strengthening of the UN, and it is a frequenter of the supranational organization’s conventions on environmental issues (203). The World Future Council has also worked extensively with the Zionist European Union, contributing several points to its Directive on renewable energy (204), an unabashed promotion of the ‘global warming’ agenda which has been thoroughly debunked as a scientific hoax (205).
UNESCO is the criminal United Nations organization that has been complicit in the anarchic corruption that has destroyed Iraq’s once flourishing educational system (206), and the group that has overseen the looting of Iraq’s most precious artifacts, antiquities and ancient books, which it attributes to ‘professionals (207).’ These professionals are none other than the agents of Mossad, who have looted Iraq’s precious artifacts from Baghdad to Mosul to Najaf (208), and UNESCO has watched Israel’s intelligence apparatus steal Iraq’s priceless history without making a peep about Zion’s crimes. This isn’t surprising however, as UNESCO has a partnership with L’Oreal, in which the supranational wing and cosmetics giant issue 5 ‘For Women In Science’ awards every year (209). L’Oreal is a massive contributor to the illegitimate Zionist state, and has set up its commercial center of the Middle East in Israel, it has been praised by the American Jewish Committee and the ADL, it has accepted awards from mass murderer Benjamin Netanyahu and has given out scholarships worth $10,000.00 to Israeli students (210). It is utter Zionist collusion on the part of UNESCO, which of course, has never been acknowledged by Wikileaks.
The questions are just begging to be asked. What kind of whistleblower organization takes money from Mossad and CIA? And what kind of whistleblower organization’s advisory board is comprised of CIA agents, CIA assets, Zionist journalists and globalists? And if such an organization takes such blood money, and is comprised of such personalities, it really isn’t all that’s cracked up to be, now is it? And it actually is what it sounds like: an intelligence front.
The most devastating blow to Wikileaks’ whistleblower aura is the revelation that it is using PROMIS software to filter the information it attains before its world-renowned leaks (211). PROMIS was created by the INSLAW corporation, owned by former NSA agent, Bill Hamilton.
Though Hamilton’s intention was to transfer the license of his revolutionary software to the United States government, PROMIS was stolen by officials from war criminal Ronald Reagan’s Justice Department and handed over to the CIA and the NSA, who re-formatted the technology to use it in global espionage operations (212). There is not an organization on planet earth with access to PROMIS software, that isn’t connected to the CIA or a proxy of the CIA. It is the final shot from the cannon, shattering every piece of Wikileaks’ armor.
Obama’s Regulation Czar, obnoxious Zionist Cass Sunstein, has called for government infiltration of all groups that propose historical revisionism and ‘conspiracy theories (213).’ With Wikileaks’ vast connections to the CIA, and its glamorous image in the anti-war movement, it is clear that Assange’s group is a reflection of Sunstein’s Orwellian vision. Wikileaks is COINTELPRO 2.0, cyber edition.
Julian Assange has been bought and paid for by Israel. |
Assange: Darling of The Zionist Elite
One wonders how documents that were written by Zionist diplomats, filtered with CIA software and vigorously promoted by the Zionist media can be so adamantly accepted as unequivocal truth by those associated with anti-war sentiments and anti-Zionism. One wonders how such individuals can discard their logic, principles and dignity so easily. And one wonders what force is preventing them from regaining their senses. Every group needs a polarizing and charismatic leader to guide them and nurture them. In the case of the successfully coopted anti-war movement, that leader is 39-year old hacker and ‘whistle-blower’ extraordinaire, Julian Assange from Queensland, Australia.
While Assange has been depicted by the Zionist media as a renegade on the run from Interpol in a high-octane Hollywood action thriller, a voice of the people and a hero to be worshiped by men and women alike, an examination of the record serves as a fan to blow the Zionist smokescreen right into the abyss and expose the man behind Zion’s mask. Though the mainstream press continues to say that Assange was arrested in the UK for ‘sex crimes’ committed in Sweden, this is a fallacy; Assange willingly met with UK police on his lawyer’s advice (214). Interpol’s infamous ‘red notice’ that it posted on Assange was never needed (215), because despite media reports of Assange living his life in hiding, the UK police knew exactly where he was for 30 days (216).
As the circus of Assange’s rape/molestation charges chugs on with vigor, the Zionist media deliberately (and conveniently) left out the fact that Sweden’s rape charges against Assange were dropped already back in August (217). Interpol, an international police cooperation outfit, is known for apprehending criminals of all sorts from pole to pole across the earth; if the intent was to incarcerate and silence Assange, why wasn’t he picked up at the internationally covered press conference he gave in Geneva in November of this year (218)?
The lawyer that instructed Julian Assange to turn himself in was Mark Stephens, of Finers Stephens Innocent, the London legal heavyweight. Mark Stephens is an ardent Zionist who defended Yoram Blachar, the former head of the Israeli Medical Association, an organization known for its doctors engaging in the horrific torture of Palestinians (219). On behalf of Blacher, Mark Stephens filed a libel suit against Dr. Derek Summerfield, a UK-based physician who repeatedly blasted Blachar and his complicity with the Zionist entity’s crimes against humanity (220).
Stephens has also defended several Zionist media outlets (221), including CNN, headed by CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, a staunch Zionist who has been honored by notorious Zionist institutions the American Jewish Committee and the Simon Wiesenthal Center (222), ABC, headed by CEO Robert Iger, who has been honored by the extremist Zionist organization, Aish HaTorah (223), the New York Times, known for its disgustingly pro-Israel bias in all of its reporting on the Middle East (224), as well as the Wall Street Journal (225), owned by ultra-Zionist Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. Finers Stephens Innocent serves as a legal advisor for Waddesdon Manor, owned by the godfathers of Israel, the Rothschild banking family, which explains why Mark Stephens is also a Freeman of the City of London (226), the financial district of London which governs all major financial happenings across the globe and is dominated by the Rothschild clan (227).
Julian Assange has his own disturbing connections to the Zionist Rothschild dynasty. In 2008, Assange accepted the ‘Economist Index On Censorship Award’ from The Economist Magazine (228). The Economist is part of the Economist Group, a media corporation which is 50% owned by the Zionist Rothschilds (229). In addition, Assange is an ‘absolute’ proponent of Zionist-designed free market capitalism, declaring in a recent Forbes interview that he ‘loves markets,’ and that Wikileaks was designed for the benefit of capitalism (230). Free market capitalism is the repugnant capitalist ideology of Milton Friedman, whom many consider to be Adam Smith reborn (231). Milton Friedman was a dual-citizen of Israel, he issued many lectures at Zionist universities built on occupied Palestinian land, he atrociously considered the illegitimate Zionist state a ‘beautiful and diversified country, with enemies on all sides,’ he donated regularly to the Israel Center for Social and Economic Progress, a Zionist ‘charity,’ and was a friend to Israeli war criminals Menachem Begin, Shimon Peres and Ariel Sharon (232).
During the transition of being ‘on the run from the law’ and turning himself in to the law, Julian Assange wrote an editorial for The Australian, the Zionist-owned newspaper where his fellow Wikileaks board member Phillip Adams is a stalwart. The very concept of writing an editorial for a Zionist-owned newspaper while supposedly on the run from international intelligence agents should have been a wake-up call for every activist who accepts Wikileaks as truth, that Assange and Wikileaks are nothing but a sideshow; unfortunately, this didn’t open their eyes to the ‘dancing bears’ either.
In Assange’s editorial, he remarkably declared that he isn’t anti-war, and what is even more opprobrious, he glorified Zionist billionaire Rupert Murdoch, and his elitist father, Keith Murdoch, citing them as sources of journalistic integrity and truth, and then comparing Wikileaks’ efforts to those of the Murdoch family (233). Rupert Murdoch is anything but a source of truth; he has dedicated billions upon billions of dollars to spreading disinformation, sensationalism and outright lies with his Fox News Network to unabashedly condone the illegal Zionist wars in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan (234); his promotion of the genocidal invasion of Iraq was in such a great amount, that it was called ‘Mr. Murdoch’s war (235).’ In that case then, Assange’s comparison is quite accurate, since Wikileaks does nothing but promote Zionist distortion.
The more despicable, and most certainly more collusive of Assange’s praises, is that of the originator of the ‘war on terror,’ Zionist war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu. In an interview with Bewkes-owned TIME Magazine, Assange called Netanyahu a ‘sophisticated politician,’ and used the butcher of Gaza as an example of a world leader who respects the leaks of his organization, and even went on to say that Netanyahu believes Wikileaks will lead to ‘an increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in relation to Iran,’ and most damningly, admitting that Cablegate was in the interest of Israel (236). It is not coincidental at all, that the two Zionist objects of Julian Assange’s praise are quite good friends; Netanyahu stays at Rupert Murdoch’s estate when the war criminal is in London (237).
What kind of whistle-blower gives his leaks to Zionist-owned, corporate, elitist newspapers and then writes an editorial for one? What kind of hero of the oppressed people hires a Zionist lawyer that defends the torture of Palestinians and the institutions that cover it up? What kind of freedom fighter accepts an award from the Rothschild family, one of the greatest causes of the destruction of peace and justice throughout the world? What kind of revolutionary is inspired by Zionist liars like the Murdoch family and offers his praise to filthy war criminals like Benjamin Netanyahu?
What kind of champion of the people subscribes to Zionist-created free market capitalism and admits that his organization was created to nonsensically make an anti-freedom and anti-ethics ideology more ‘free and ethical?’ What kind of defender of truth mentions Iran’s nuclear program as if it was a threat to ‘peace’ while totally ignoring hundreds of Israeli nukes? Julian Assange is none of these things; and to label him as such, is an insult to those righteous persons who are. Julian Assange is a Zionist shill, bought and paid for by the Israel-first elite, Mossad and the CIA, planted in the activism community as the front man for the new generation of COINTELPRO.
Resistance and Knowledge will trigger Revolution; not Wikileaks. |
Conclusion: Real Heroes and Real Leaks
A final note needs to be made about some recent allegations in Arabic media regarding secret videos and recordings of Julian Assange taking money from Israeli officials and cutting a deal with the Zionist entity to protect it from Wikileaks’ document dumps (238). While it is indeed true that Assange has certainly taken money from Israeli intelligence, this theory implies that Wikileaks wasn’t always a corrupt organization; that the intentions of Wikileaks were once pure. This is a terribly false narrative that makes Assange and company look like victims bullied by the Zionist entity. Assange and his crew are assets of Israel, not enemies turned friends.
It is already an established fact that Assange has been taking money from Mossad, CIA and Zionist George Soros from the very beginning; before Wikileaks even became an internationally renowned ‘whistle-blower,’ the Zionist media was treating it as such, with Assange’s organization being touted by Zionist-owned TIME Magazine and the propaganda-spewing Washington Post (239). Wikileaks’ first official leak was a despicable pack of lies against the Somali Resistance (240), fighting vehemently against the Zionist-instigated, US-backed United Nations-African Union occupation of the their country (241). Every leak thereafter didn’t harm Israel either; this shows solidarity with the illegitimate usurping regime from the jump, not a case of flip-flopping and turn-coating. In addition, Julian Assange has admitted to having connections to Australian intelligence (242), which has been reporting first to Mossad for decades, including, not so ironically, in the case of true whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu, tipping the Israeli intelligence agency off prior to his kidnaping (243).
The very fact that Assange has given all of his documents to Zionist-owned elitist media outlets should have been enough to raise a red flag with anyone and everyone pursing truth, peace and justice. Instead, like sheep, Wikileaks’ followers are being led right to slaughter. Just like the sinking of the Lusitania was the false flag for World War One, Pearl Harbor was the false flag for World War Two, the Gulf of Tonkin was the false flag for Vietnam and 9/11 was the false flag for Zionism’s current hegemonic onslaught against the Middle East, Wikileaks is the Zionist-created false flag that is being used right now, at this very moment, to usher in an all-out assault on the internet, with Zionist war criminal Joseph Lieberman leading the way with the first shot: new legislation that is being called ‘Patriot Act for the internet (244).’
A real leak is one that doesn’t serve the Zionist agenda; a real hero is one that fights against Zionism and exposes it with reckless abandon, only concerned with the truth.
No mention in the Zionist media is the leak of the names, ranks, photos and addresses of 200 Israeli war criminals that participated in the genocide of Operation Cast Lead against occupied Gaza in 2008-09 (245).
No mention in the Zionist media is the leak initiated by former IOF soldier Anat Kam, who delivered 2,000 classified military files that detailed war crimes (including targeted assassinations) committed in the occupied West Bank to Haaretz journalist Uri Blau (246). An Israeli gag order was put on the whole affair (247), and Anat Kam remains on house arrest, awaiting a life imprisonment sentence for ‘treason’ against the Israeli regime (248).
Unless it is part of a smear campaign, there is no mention in the Zionist media of the undeniably true statements of courageous former White House press core reporter Helen Thomas, who said that Zionists own Congress, the White House, Hollywood, Wall Street and American foreign policy (249). Instead of dissecting the evidence, there are only pathetic accusations of anti-Semitism.Never mentioned in the rotten Zionist media is Gary Webb, the brave investigative journalist that completely exposed the CIA drug trafficking operation to pump cocaine into African-American communities in Los Angeles (250). Contrary to ridiculous media reports of Gary Webb committing suicide by shooting himself in the head twice, he was assassinated by the CIA for bringing the agency’s racist criminality to light (251).
Never mentioned by the Zionist-owned media machine is the tragic story of another noble investigative reporter, Danny Casolaro, who unearthed an international conspiracy centered around the theft of the aforementioned PROMIS software of the INSLAW corporation, with the butcher of Iraq, Zionist war criminal George H.W. Bush sitting at the head, shadowing the affair through his secretive criminal society known as the Black Rose; Casolaro was snuffed out in brutal fashion by the very same criminals he exposed (252).No mention in the Zionist-controlled press is the meticulous and shocking research of Edward Hooper, who wrote a nearly-1,200-page investigative masterpiece undeniably destroying mainstream AIDS theory and uncovering that it was actually created by a Zionist scientist named Hillary Koprowski, who gave contaminated, mutated dosages of Oral Polio Vaccine to more than a quarter of a million Congolese youth after being commissioned by the United States government to do so (253).Never in the Zionist media are the veracious efforts of Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips mentioned, who blew the whistle on the barbaric CIA mind control programs of Project Monarch and MKULTRA, which brought to light the unbearably twisted criminal behavior of the highest echelons of various governments (254).
Never mentioned by the Zionist media is Sibel Edmonds, the Turkish-American FBI translator turned whistle-blower that exposed varying degrees of spying within the US government, including significant revelations about collusion between the Turkish military, Israeli military intelligence, AIPAC and the neo-conservative Zionist Power Configuration governing America’s foreign policy (255).
And never is it mentioned, nor will it ever be mentioned by the Zionist media the name of Milton William Cooper, better known as Bill Cooper, the writer, shortwave radio broadcaster, researcher and activist that exposed every degree of the international conspiracy dominating the world today (256), including a brilliant expose of the vile history of the Anti-Defamation League (257). On June 28th, 2001, during his nightly ‘Hour Of The Time’ broadcast, which can be heard on various outlets across the web, Bill Cooper predicted that a false flag attack was to be carried out in New York City in the coming months, and it would be blamed on Osama Bin Laden to initiate the next phase of globalization, or the ‘New World Order.’
In November of 2001, just months after his chilling prediction, Bill Cooper was murdered outside of his home.
These men and women, along with the previously discussed Mordechai Vanunu and Robert Friedman, are real whistle-blowers; real journalists; real activists; and in several cases, real heroes. Their sacrifice, along with the sacrifice and efforts of giants like Malcolm X, Patrice Lumumba, Salvador Allende, Fela Kuti, Omar Mukhtar, Mehdi Ben Barka, Che Guevara, General Abdul Karim Qasem, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Fred Hampton and Ayatollah Sayyed Ruhollah Khomeini should be studied and drawn upon for light, strength, inspiration and guidance in the revolutionary struggle for peace, truth, freedom and justice for all oppressed people.
The Zionist media can keep Julian Assange and the rest of its intelligence-connected, manufactured frauds.It must never be forgotten (and constantly reiterated) that Assange despicably stated that he is annoyed by ‘false conspiracies such as 9/11 (258),’ although there is overwhelming evidence that there was a massive cover-up to hide the fact that the towers were demolished from the inside with explosives (259), and that there were Mossad agents and high-ranking sayanim of the Zionist entity at every post to carry out the intricacies of the famed false flag attack (260).
Like Bin Laden, who was in a US hospital meeting with CIA officials only two months before the 9/11 attacks (261), Julian Assange was a guest at a cocktail party at a US embassy nearly a year ago (262). Revelations will continue to surface about Assange’s deception and his connections to the usurping, occupying Tel Aviv regime while the Zionist media simultaneously lies to the public about his heroism in the typical, perfect language of the Hegelian Dialectic. Do not fall for the trick. Wikileaks is Zionist poison. This is the deconstruction of the myth that says it is anything but.
~ The End ~
*
Sources
(1) Obama And The Jews by Pauline Dubkin Yearwood, Chicago Jewish News
(2) Obama Pledges ‘Unshakeable Commitment’ To Israel’s Security by Jonathan D. Salant, Bloomberg
(3) Obama’s Gaza Silence Condemned by Al-Jazeera
(4) A Day Of Terror: The Israelis; Spilled Blood Is Seen As Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer by James Bennet, The New York Times
(5) Conflict With Iraq – An Israeli Perspective by Benjamin Netanyahu
(6) Netanyahu: 9/11 Attacks Good For Israel by Al-Manar; Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good For Israel by Haaretz and Reuters
(7) Netanyahu To US Jews: Direct Mideast Talks Will Begin Very Soon by Natasha Mozgovaya and Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(8) Netanyahu: Israel Won’t Be Center Of Wikileaks Release by Ma’an News Agency
(9) Israel ‘Satisfied’ As Wikileaks Shows Consistency On Iran by Ma’an News Agency
(10) Video: The Wiki (Israel) Leaks by Russia Today
(11) Israel Greets Wikileaks As Vindication Of Its Iran Policy by Joshua Mitnick, The Christian Science Monitor
INTELLIGENCE AGENDA SHINES THROUGH LATEST WIKI-DUMP
…disinformation campaign against the US, Pakistan and Libyan rebels
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
Wikileaks is like the Hydra of Greek mythology. You cut off one head, another springs out, even more vicious than the one lying at your feet. After having waited until the scandal died down, discrediting Wikileaks for its ties to Israeli intelligence and its pattern of using censorship and ‘seeded’ information to serve a pro-war agenda, 700 new documents are released today on “Gitmo.”
At first glance, this is the usual Wikileaks “chickenfeed.” Yes, everyone knows America tortured prisoners, held innocent men for years and was utterly inept in handling intelligence. Though tales of sexual humiliation and torture sell newspapers, the information itself was old news years ago. However, as is usually the case, every Wikileak has a “Wiki-agenda” behind it and this one, as usual, is no exception.
The New York Times was heavily ‘burned” by Wikileaks, having been discredited by Assange’s reporting of censorship of leaked information that was turned over to that publication. Their report on today’s leak is restrained and cautious.
A NUCLEAR THREAT, BUT FROM WHOM?
On the other hand, Newsweek’s “Daily Beast” is everything but. Sydney Harmon, Newsweek’s publisher who died recently, has allowed Newsweek and its sister publication to serve military and intelligence interests of Israel. Their popular website, The Daily Beast, has stepped in with both feet:
Al Qaeda Threatens a ‘Nuclear Hellstorm’
In another chilling revelation, the files show that admitted 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed claimed that al Qaeda operatives had planted a hidden nuclear bomb in Europe, vowing to detonate it if Osama bin Laden were ever captured. They promised a “nuclear hellstorm.” Attempts by al Qaeda to obtain nukes have been previously documented.
This is what Newsweek “gleaned” from Wikileaks. Here is another, even more frightening version from the Guardian:
“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets…We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen”
The problem with the second and far more serious threat is that it is made by prominent Israeli spokesman Martin Van Cleveld and talks of an Israeli nuclear attack on Europe, not one by Al Qaeda. We know Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons. We also know that a vital UN vote is coming up in September, a vote that could establish a Palestinian state under UN protection and set an agenda to return land stolen by Israeli “settlers.”
Both quotes are nuclear threats against Europe. America has also been under the threat of nuclear terrorism. VT reports:
“The American people are afraid, they see disaster coming. Everyone is waiting to see what city is chosen to be sacrificed. Will it be Phoenix or Sacramento or perhaps Atlanta? This is the real fear, the “not so secret” fear in the heart of every American.”
The first “nuclear threat” quote is a carefully “seeded” (an accusation made against Wikieaks byZbigniew Brzezinski document pulled out of context and promoted by a publication even more “Israeli-sensitive” than even Wikileaks itself, whose embattled head, Julian Assange, has long been established as a close ally of Israel.
Brzezinski said this to Judy Woodruff about Wikileaks:
I wonder whether, in fact, there aren’t some operations internationally, intelligence services, that are feeding stuff to WikiLeaks, because it is a unique opportunity to embarrass us, to embarrass our position, but also to undermine our relations with particular governments.
Both are serious threats to Europe. Problem is, when you look beneath the surface, both are threats against Europe and, in reality, both come from Israel. In fact, the “Khalid Shaikh Mohammed” that the US is holding in custody is widely believed to be a case of mistaken identity, a man who has been tortured more than anyone in history since the “Man in the Iron Mask.”
BIN LADEN “DEAD AS ELVIS” BROUGHT TO LIFE BY WIKILEAKS
There has long been conjecture that Osama bin Laden may never have been involved in terrorism and that Al Qaeda may never have really existed.
In light of the massive fabricated intelligence from the Iraq War, particularly since revelations this week by Nobel Prize winner El Baradei, the credibility of any “intelligence” on Al Qaeda or bin Laden comes into question.
From an AP story today:
Former chief U.N. nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei suggests in a new memoir that Bush administration officials should face international criminal investigation for the “shame of a needless war” in Iraq.
Freer to speak now than he was as an international civil servant, the Nobel-winning Egyptian accuses U.S. leaders of “grotesque distortion” in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq invasion, when then-President George W. Bush and his lieutenants claimed Iraq possessed doomsday weapons despite contrary evidence collected by ElBaradei’s and other arms inspectors inside the country
This BBC report, suppressed in the United States, claims that, not only was bin Laden never a terrorist leader, but Al Qaeda is a myth as well:
[youtube mztfFdpd1Rk]
More questionable reporting comes from the Washington Post. This is the lead line in their front page coverage today:
On Sept. 11, 2001, the core of al-Qaeda was concentrated in a single city: Karachi, Pakistan.
But we though Osama bin Laden planned it all, over a period of years, in Afghanistan. Is there a reason to “deflect” attention from bin Laden, now known to have been dead for so many years despite the continual release of video and now audio tapes by the Israeli news agency SITE Intelligence?According to the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States, the last bin Laden transcript included the following statement (from a classified CIA archive):
- “I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States.”
- “Neither I had any knowledge of these attacks nor I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act. . Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people. Such a practice is forbidden ever in the course of a battle.” (Central Intelligence Agency Official Translation)
UPI’s Editor, Arnaud de Borchgrave says the following regarding the death of Osama bin Laden:
CIA Director Leon Panetta said in early July that the intelligence agency hadn’t been able to positively confirm any specific information on the uber-terrorist since “late 2001.” And all those audio and video tapes broadcast by the Qatar-based Al Jazeera global television network? Clever Israeli forgeries, says Duff.
Many other voices in cyberspace claim the bin Laden myth is kept “alive” to justify the Afghan war and the global war on terror.Angelo Codevilla, who teaches international relations at Boston University, is a former U.S. intelligence officer who studied Soviet disinformation techniques during the Cold War.
He says a close examination of all the alleged bin Laden tapes, including the videos, have convinced him that Elvis Presley is more alive than Osama bin Laden. By all accounts from those who knew him prior to 9/11, bin Laden was a deeply religious man and his early tapes after 9/11 were sprinkled with references to God and the Prophet Muhammad.
Not so the later ones, which were subsequently analyzed by some experts who said they were professional forgeries.The last time credible intercepts of bin Laden’s voice were made by overhead satellites in early December 2001 as he was escaping through the Tora Bora mountain range from Afghanistan to the sanctuary of Pakistan’s tribal areas.
With bin Laden dead, is there a Wikileaks “agenda” to put Pakistan under the gun, particularly after reports tying admitted murderer Raymond Davis to an Indian/Israeli terrorist cell working with the Taliban. Pakistan’s advanced missile program and new “nuclear capable’ long range bombers may be seen as a threat to moves in the region if Paksitan-American relations continue to cool.
The biggest giveaway is the return to attacks on Pakistan and her intelligence services. This seems to be the greatest area of Wikileaks bias. The Daily Beast reports:
Pakistan Intelligence Service Labeled as Terrorism
A damning document that surely won’t help strained relationships between the U.S. and Pakistan: The main Pakistani intelligence service, ISI, was listed by American authorities as a terrorist organization—on par with al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah. “Through associations” with these groups, the documents say, the ISI was linked to “terrorist or insurgent activity.”
However, the Economic Times reports, only two weeks ago:
WASHINGTON: Pakistani spy master Lt. Gen. Ahmad Shuja Pasha flew into Washington for what an official called a “frank discussion” with Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director Leon Panetta on the strained US-Pakistan relationship.
CIA spokesman Preston Golson called the discussions between Pasha and Panetta “productive” and said the “CIA-ISI relationship remains on solid footing.”
In fact, the “damning document” referred to by Newsweek is one of dozens carefully “seeded” into Wikileaks and equally “seeded” into the Newsweek story.
Yes, the documents are “damning” but more for Newsweek, Israel and Julian Assange.
General Mirza Aslam Beg, former Chief of Staff, Army of Paksitan, said this in an article in VT:
The Wikileaks revelations confirm the obvious, more than what it informs us about the darker corners of ‘US diplomacy, cloaked in securitocracy.’In fact, it is Cyber War, in the new game of psy-warfare, targeting individuals and countries, to cover-up the shame of defeat of war on Afghanistan, war on Iraq and 2006 Israeli war on Lebanon. The cyber war has been launched, impacting public opinion globally, and focusing on three objectives mainly:
- To cause defamation of the countries which have had a role, direct or indirect, in the defeat of the Americans and their allies, in Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan, and create mistrust amongst them, so that they are not able to challenge future American plans in the region.
- To create conditions for a civil war in Afghanistan and out of the chaos and confusion, reduce Pakistan and Iran to subservience, something they have not been able to achieve during the last thirty years.
- To establish Indian hegemony over South Asia, including Afghanistan, and project American strategic interests in the region.
The technique used in making these revelations is typical of psy operations approach, of mixing truth with lies in a manner that truth tends to get submerged under the lies, as is the case here.
The report has not said a word about Israel, nor it gives any disadvantage to US in the implementation of policies in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and other Muslim countries, which have been particularly targeted.
The Wikileaks betrays the role of a country with resources to break the secret code of US diplomatic order, because it is not possible for an individual like Julian Assange, the fugitive, to accomplish such high profile task. The report, no doubt, has created ripples around the world, but will subside as it is looked into with a deeper perspective, regarding its source, intent and purpose.
WASHINGTON POST GOES “NUTTER” ON BIN LADEN
Mixed with Wikileaks “chickenfeed” and unsubstantiated reports of the heinous acts of every nation but Israel (despite Julian Assange’s assertion that he would publish “dirt” on Israel many months ago) is wild conjecture steamed up by the papers themselves. Worst of all is the Washington Post.Mixing Wikileaks with unsupported and unfounded text, the Post buries themselves in their attempt to establish Osama bin Laden as “alive and well” in Pakistan, a position they have taken with no sources, not even Wikileak material.The Post is simply “making it all up.”Here, from the Post:
According to the documents, four days after the Sept. 11 attacks, bin Laden visited a guesthouse in Afghanistan’s Kandahar province. He told the Arab fighters gathered there “to defend Afghanistan against the infidel invaders” and to “fight in the name of Allah.”
It was beginning of a peripatetic three months for bin Laden and Zawahiri. Traveling by car among several locations in Afghanistan, bin Laden handed out assignments to his followers, met with some of the Taliban leadership and delegated control of al-Qaeda to the group’s Shura Council, presumably because he feared being captured or killed as U.S. forces closed in.
Here the Post attempts to cover its “behind” by cutting off contact with bin Laden after his death on December 14, 2001. Note that the use of “according to documents” doesn’t reference Wikileaks or provide any references as to whether the documents they are using are ones they wrote themselves, which, in fact, they are.
They go on:
Bin Laden, accompanied by Zawahiri and a handful of close associates in his security detail, escaped to his cave complex in Tora Bora in November. Around Nov. 25, he was seen giving a speech to the leaders and fighters at the complex.
According to the documents, bin Laden and his deputy escaped from Tora Bora in mid-December 2001. At the time, the al-Qaeda leader was apparently so strapped for cash that he borrowed $7,000 from one of his protectors — a sum he paid back within a year.
Yes, bin Laden escaped, and I’ll bet he hasn’t paid back the $7,000 he borrowed. Invented details like the $7000 loan are a ploy to add credibility to phony story. Spies, when being trained to plant false information, are told to add colorful details to “sell” their disinformation.
This is exactly what the Washington Post is doing. The idea of Osama bin Laden, even after his death, borrowing money is absurd for so many reasons.
Here is more from the Washington Post:
The place was teeming with fighters who were awaiting for al-Qaeda to return their passports so they could flee across the border to Pakistan.
What part of “fleeing to Pakistan” involves a Passport? Weren’t we told that there were hundreds of unguarded mountain passes that made the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan one of the most porous in the World?
Is it because terrorists hiding from the authorities in Pakistan want to be caught with a passport that proves they “fled” from Afghanistan? Would a terrorist travel dozens of miles an official border checkpoint, all supervised by the CIA and ISI, in order to be questioned?Shouldn’t the Post be more careful when making things up?But there’s more and it gets even better:
There are few geographic references in the documents for bin Laden after his flight into Pakistan. He apparently sent out letters from his hiding place through a trusted courier, who then handed them to Libbi, who had provided the secret guesthouse in Kabul immediately after the Sept. 11 attacks.In May 2005, while waiting for bin Laden’s courier at a drop point, Libi was arrested by Pakistani special forces.
Here, the post, not even citing “documents” simply wings it, bringing “Elvis” bin Laden back from the dead, placing him in Pakistan and attributing him a zombie-like existence in an ethereal world with “few geographic references” until he faded from memory.
LIBYA, ISRAEL AND WIKILEAKS
Perhaps the most controversial and most revealing of the Wikileaks involves Libya. Colonel Gaddafi had been seen as one of the great threats against Israel but, curiously, no pressure against Gaddafi had been placed on the US by Israel, even when Gaddafi had engaged in acts of terror. Then, with a revolt in full force against Gaddafi in the offing, Israeli papers report that he turned to Israel for military aid against his own people.
[youtube TrZB-hasXf0]
Newsweek, in its unattributed article today included the following:
From Gitmo to Leading Libya’s Rebels
One notable Guantanano inmate in the files is Abu Sufian Ibrahim Ahmed Hamuda Bin Qumu, a captive in the prison for five years who had been deemed a “probable member of al Qaeda” by the U.S. But now his relationship to America is a more complex: Qumu, a native of Libya, is now a leading figure among that’s country’s rebel fighters against Col. Gaddafi. His Gitmo assessment says he has a “non-specific personality disorder.”
A recurring and yet unsupported claim from certain circles in the US closely aligned with Israel is that insurgent forces in Libya are led by Al Qaeda. Most telling, however, aren’t the unsubstantiated reports, but rather who is making them.
The question is, not whether Al Qaeda is in Libya or not. Al Qaeda simply doesn’t exist, except in the media and when defense and security agencies around the world are asking for money or dodging having to explain for their involvement in the worldwide heroin trade that has grown up in Afghanistan under NATO occupation.
Primary ‘water carrier’ for the phony Al Qaeda reports on Libya is Admiral James Stavridis, top American commander in Europe. Stavridis is also Israel’s “monkeyboy” in the US military. From the Telegraph:
Admiral James Stavridis, Nato’s Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, said that American intelligence had picked up “flickers” of terrorist activity among the rebel groups. Senior British government figures described the comment as “very alarming”.
Stavridis is a constant visitor to Tel Aviv and is considered Israel’s biggest supporter among America’s top military commanders. One must also note that it is both Stavridis and Wikileaks that are “tasked” with characterizing the “Arab Spring” in Libya whose entire NATO support mechanism is under Stavridis’ personal command as infiltrated by ‘terrorists.’
Why is Admiral Stavridis undermining the mission of his own command? Why is he telling American forces that they are, according to his beliefs, supporting terrorism?
How is Stavridis keeping his job?
THE WIKI-CABAL
In our latest Wikileak, they are returning to their roots, a rehash of the America bashing of the Iraq video, a rehash of their attacks on Pakistan, seeded with key elements of Israel’s disinformation agenda.
What does this current campaign, and we have to call it that, either “disinformation,” or “psyop,” attempt to accomplish?
Wikileaks has never mentioned nuclear threats before. There is no intelligence that ties any terrorist organization to a potential nuclear attack on the US or Europe but there are reports of a “false flag” agenda by Israel to push the United States into attacking Iran. There is a very real nuclear weapons security alert around the world but it has nothing to do with Al Qaeda as this story from VT tells us:
When “lost nuke” recovery team leader Valerie Plame was framed by Republicans close to President Bush, was this to cover Bush or Tony Blair or Israel. The Plame “outing” puts the lost nukes in Israel. None of the other possible countries that could be holding the weapons would get White House protection. Plame got too close but couldn’t be murdered like Dr. David Kelly, not with a husband that had the kind of political connections that Plame has.
There is only one reason for a threat of nuclear terrorism and only one agenda it would support, one long backed by Israel and Wikileaks, the invasion of Iran by the United States, something that would never be considered under any circumstances less than a nuclear attack.
Thus, this is the top of Wikileaks agenda and in turn, the top of Israel’s wishlist.
With Israel’s partnership with India in the development of long range missiles capable of striking, not only China but the United States as well, Israsel/Wikileaks is paying a debt or perhaps making an investment in returning to attacks on Pakistan.
Intelligence sources at the highest levels of, not only Pakistan, but the United States as well, place full complicity in the endless and deadly terrorist attacks inside Pakistan by the Taliban on, not only India’s RAW but Israel’s Mossad as well.
These attacks, primarily aimed at destabilizing Pakistan, India’s “blood enemy,” have also spilled over into Afghanistan and caused the deaths of dozens of Americans.
It has been Wikileak’s job to try to tie Pakistan’s ISI to the same Taliban forces they are actively fighting, forces that have killed hundreds in Pakistan over the past year alone.
In fact, Pakistan’s influence in Afghanistan is nil, their relations with their own Pashtun population and the Pashtun majority in Afghanistan permanently stained by Pakistan’s seeming complicity in US drone attacks that have killed hundreds of innocent civilians.Wikileaks characterization of the situation on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan, is not only inaccurate but, even by propaganda standards, disturbingly inept.
The oddest lesson of the recent Wikileak is confirmation of suspicions that Libya and Israel have been maintaining a covert alliance for years, one kept secret by Colonel Gaddafi, whose blusterous pronouncements have fooled many into believing him to be a genuine advocate for Palestinian rights.
If anything, those seeking insights into the secret alliances and layered “subtext” of the secret world see Wikileaks as a gift.For those with the skills and attention span, Wikileaks is a “hardwired” connection into the world of spies and deceit.
WIKIWEASEL FLASHBACK (FROM Wikiweasel II)“Two Bedouins walk up to an Army checkpoint outside of Kirkuk. They ask for cigarettes. They are dirty, you can smell them 10 feet away. A young NCO eyes them carefully, fingering the safety on his M-4 carbine and responds. “You can have a whole pack but first you have to give us information.” The Bedouins look at each other and smile.
“We just saw two, no ten Iranians swimming the Euphrates River. It looked like they had guns, no I think it was bombs, no, a big bomb, a dirty bomb I think I heard them say. We heard them say they were meeting their friends from Pakistan, no, I think it was Al Qaeda, no, now that I think of it, it was Al Qaeda from Pakistan, maybe bin Laden himself, yeah, that’s the ticket.” “They were taking nuclear weapons and meeting Usama bin Laden.”The corporal, listening intently with a touch of skepticism looks the taller of the two in the eye and asks, “Where, exactly were they carrying these bombs again?”The two Bedouins look at each other again, a smile spreads across their faces as they turn to the young soldier, “They had the bombs in their underwear, of course, where to you think terrorists keep such things?”
Another Wikileak is born…….
WIKIWEASEL II
WIKIWEASEL I
Gordon Duff posted articles on VT from 2008 to 2022. He is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. A disabled veteran, he worked on veterans and POW issues for decades.
Gordon is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists. He manages the world’s largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.
Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world, and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than “several” countries. He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist, and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration. Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Behind bars how can Saint Julian Mossange spend all that money he makes from his pals the Mossad
Not sure how to take this hit on Assange. Maybe I wasn’t paying enough attention to everything he said and did during his leak exposing run, as I had never seen anything grab me by the throat the was this piece. On the face of it, it seems illogical. Why would th’very people who torture him now be the 1s he us duplicitusly
Not having a Trump card proves Assange is nothing more than a pawn.
All of this material and nothing relating to 9/11, how Israel did it with nukes. Nothing. That tells me that Wikileaks is a Zionist limited-hangout operation. If he’d spilled the beans about 9/11 he’d have been dead years ago.
Tommy
The only role Assange had in 9/11 was to aid in the coverup by calling all research into 9/11, the most important false flag of our era, “a distraction”
Does the material get edited like the Haifa housewives edit wikipedia? Or is it scrubbed clean before it is launched?
Comments are closed.