Wife Problem? – Legal Experts Slam Clarence Thomas’ dissent as ‘fucking stupid’

By
Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff
-
5
719
via Twitter

RS: On Wednesday, in an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court rejected former President Donald Trump’s effort to block the release of presidential papers from the National Archives to the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol insurrection — bringing an end to a heated legal battle and giving the committee a major win.

The decision promptly triggered reactions from legal and political scholars. Former Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe praised the decision, calling it “huge.”



Former federal prosecutor Joyce Vance similarly praised the decision, although she expressed surprise at the reasoning the Court stated in its decision.

American Bridge attorney Brad Moss sardonically referenced the fact that former President Trump is unlikely to pay the lawyers who represented him in the failed suit.

Political scholar Norm Ornstein, meanwhile, took aim at Justice Clarence Thomas — the lone dissenting justice — for not recusing himself from the case, given his wife’s public support for the Capitol insurrectionists as the attack was unfolding.

Yale Law School professor Scott Shapiro joked on Twitter that he wondered if there was a “legal claim so absurd that even Clarence Thomas wouldn’t dissent.”

Florida-based Democratic attorney Daniel Uhlfelder, meanwhile, wrote that “Justice Clarence Thomas really doesn’t want to the January 6th committee to see those documents.”

https://www.rawstory.com/clarence-thomas/

 

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

5 COMMENTS

  1. I see a lot of high praise for the SC, when this was neither controversial nor difficult.

    It’s like running out with a parade and marching band, because the garbage man came on the right day. Geez. How did our bar get so low ?

    • The pubes needed a token they could control, so they found a black guy with a pubic hair on a pop can. That is who Thomas is. His controller is easy to identify, because he kept his mouth shut for a decade right up until that dude was found dead of natural causes, with as pillow on his face. Nice bunch. Gut it, and get 13 Justices, then cap the terms.

    • I think the jubilant reaction to this run of the mill decision, needs to be observed carefully.
      It is telling, of the need for unprecedented changes in our SC. There is no pride to be found there, by any US person or veteran.

  2. Maybe its all reversed – the presidential documents already doctored and altered by whoever it is that has been overseeing them – and release of documents is going to reinforce Trumps “innocence” and they all know it, except for Clarence Two face dumber than doorknob. Have a cigar You’ll go far…

Comments are closed.