ALERT: Sourced from Russian State-Controlled Media
Question: As you know, Serbia has not joined the sanctions [against Russia]. Did it come as a surprise to you that some of the Balkan nations who have recently had a good relationship with Russia have joined the sanctions against it? What is your perspective on the efforts to bring relations with these Balkan countries back to normal later?
Sergey Lavrov: We are seeing unprecedented pressure as part of a general campaign, which some Western politicians call an all-out war against Russia where all means are justified. This did not just start now – far from it.
Over the previous ten years, the European Union, in its relations with the countries seeking to join it, has been demanding – the Serbs know this well – that they join all their foreign policy initiatives that of late have been increasingly anti-Russia in character. This has nothing to do with a single economic space or with introducing the rule of law or anything else like that. There is only an ideologically-charged approach that allows them to continue to put pressure on Russia to emasculate its independence in the international arena and have it accept European values, which Europe has long since been inculcating [in others], despite its Christian roots.
Allow me to remind you that when they were working on the European Union Constitution, which, in the end, was not approved and was replaced by the Treaty of Lisbon, the first version began with a reference to Europe’s Christian roots. The European “grandees” refused to support this wording, having repudiated their race and religious traditions. They can hardly be expected to have respect for the traditions of other faiths.
We are seeing this pressure being exerted on the Balkan countries, including Serbia, to have them join the anti-Russia sanctions, which cover almost all economic, cultural, humanitarian, political, and other activities. President of Serbia Aleksandar Vucic has spoken about this in detail in public several times, emphasizing that Serbia will be guided by its own interests. There are also countries like this in the European Union. I just want to mention the recent statement by Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orban, who said that Hungary would stand up for its own interests.
This multi-ethnic self-reproducing bureaucracy with a seat in Brussels is trying to subjugate all countries without exception and concentrate all efforts on establishing rules and standards at the headquarters of the European Union, reducing to a minimum what its member countries can do on their own. This is a flawed policy. It shows yet again that, essentially, a certain trend is emerging in the European Union to strengthen autocracy as represented by Brussels in its relations with the member countries.
Montenegro and North Macedonia have been drawn into the sanctions war. They were tempted by the promise of fast rapprochement with the European Union, but this did not happen. They were drawn into NATO and anti-Russia actions and campaigns. Then they were patted on the shoulder, as it were, and told: “Good job, fellas, keep it up.” This is a serious problem. The EU’s reputation and the real goals of its policy in the Balkans are at stake. I believe the United States has given the EU complete control over the Balkans. The US is fully satisfied with the EU’s aggressive anti-Russia line.
Do you remember this statement by Josep Borrell’s predecessor Federica Mogherini? She accused Russia of being too active in the Balkans and said that if the EU started getting involved there, there was no room for others. Her successor Josep Borrell promotes the same idea. He has always urged the EU not to allow Russia to build stronger relations with those countries where it feels like “the boss of the show.”
We are seeing attempts by the US, the EU, and NATO to impose their hegemony on others, not only in the Balkans but also in the rest of the world –virtually everywhere else. I am convinced that most countries around the world realize that this is the path to a deadlock. It will eventually be necessary to find a way out. There are not too many countries in Europe that can consider themselves sovereign and independent. Those that refuse to join the sanctions in favor of other states to protect their own national interest are fully entitled to be called independent regardless of their size.
Question: Did Russia envision such isolation and military losses, things we rarely hear precise information about?
Sergey Lavrov: The sanctions against Russia have never stopped. In Soviet times, we lived under the sanctions of the Coordinating Committee for Multilateral Export Controls (CoCom). Under this, the West did all it could to prevent the purchase and supply of high-tech equipment. The Jackson-Vanik amendment existed for many years. It was repealed to allow us to join the World Trade Organisation (WTO) because the United States and other countries were interested in this. It was instantly replaced by the Magnitsky Act which continued the tradition of pressuring the Russian Federation through sanctions. These sanctions were valid until 2014.
A coup took place in Kiev in 2014 contrary to the guarantees of the EU and with Washington’s direct support. Now there is no longer any doubt about it. The coup evoked indignation in both Crimea and in the east of Ukraine. The Crimeans held a referendum to return to Russia, protecting themselves against the armed militants that were bound for Crimea. The people in eastern Ukraine also proclaimed the creation of republics that refused to accept the anti-constitutional government coup. At that time, the Russian Federation was again blamed for everything. The West was disappointed that its plan to finally use Ukraine for its anti-Russia needs fell through.
The introduced sanctions simply reflected the West’s irritation. President of Russia Vladimir Putin has said more than once that since then the EU and the US have imposed sanctions on us almost every month, at least two or three times a year. I think it is always easy to find an excuse. The goal of the sanctions is not to resolve some specific problem but to curb Russia’s strategic and geopolitical development. We know that the West is good at finding excuses.
The surge in unprecedented Neanderthal-like Russophobia that has come to life in almost all Western countries whose leaders are vigorously encouraging and cultivating it was something that struck me, particularly in the circumstances at hand. I’m aware that there are reasonable people in the EU who understand the danger of inciting this kind of Russophobia. They are issuing reminders to the effect that Europe saw a similar attitude towards a certain ethnicity over 80 years ago and they know how it ended. This obsession with regard to how they see everything Russian, be it culture, art, education, or Russian citizens (as soon as they start speaking their language in many European countries), has taken over almost all European countries. This struck me because it revealed the Neanderthal entrails of Russophobia. It appears to have been brewing for a long time now. It’s impossible to bring to life a sentiment like that in just one day. So it was carefully hidden. We will make corresponding conclusions.
Isolation doesn’t exist and is brought up exclusively by those who, mentally and ideologically, have resigned themselves to the inevitability of a Western dictatorship on the global stage. This dictatorship is supported primarily by the West itself which is loath to lose its positions. The West has been the world’s dominant player for over 500 years now. A different era – the forming of a multipolar international order – is nowhere. The global economic development hubs pursuing a nationally oriented policy have risen, and they do not want to accept the impersonal neoliberal values imposed by the West on the world. They want to be grounded in their history, traditions, and values, including religious values. By and large, they are common to all world religions.
Russia has many partners in the Asia-Pacific region, Asia, Africa and Latin America. We have good relations with the vast majority of organizations created by the developing countries, including the African Union, the Community of Latin American and the Caribbean States, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and many others. As you are aware, organizations with the participation of the Russian Federation have been created and are successfully functioning in Eurasia which is a critically important, strategically developing region: the Commonwealth of the Independent States, the Eurasian Economic Union, the Collective Security Treaty Organisation, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. In cooperation with ASEAN, these organizations are vigorously promoting interaction among them and developing a network of cooperation projects in conjunction with China’s Belt and Road Initiative, among others. We are building the Greater Eurasian Partnership. Our relations with China are at their all-time best. Russia has a particularly privileged strategic partnership with India. We have ties with the majority of the Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African countries.
The West is trying to showcase the so-called “isolation” in which the Russian Federation allegedly found itself by presenting the mathematical results of the UN vote. We are aware of how they get these results and the kind of shameless blackmail the developing countries are subjected to, and personal threats against the representatives of these countries at the UN or other organizations. For us, this means only one thing: the United States and the Western countries that are playing along with this crude and undisguised blackmail are themselves afraid of being isolated. If they are that confident in their ideals and values that can win their way to the hearts and minds of all people around the world, then let them state their position and allow the countries to make a choice. These countries are aware of the position adopted by the West, Russia, China, and other major global players. Let them choose freely without any pressure.
During his recent visit to Europe, US President Joseph Biden said that we were entering an era of long confrontation between democracy and autocracy. Look at how the modern West is functioning, look at the countries that have declared themselves a model of democracy. The United States has subdued entire of Europe. It is leading not only NATO but actually also the EU, using its infrastructure and potential for strengthening US military and political positions in the Old World. As for democracies and autocracies, this “community of democracies” represented by the US, NATO, and the EU has become an integral whole (under US command). It is an overt autocracy if not a dictatorship as regards other members of the international community.
Our Western colleagues have urged us and other countries for many years to ensure the supremacy of law and democracy in the US interpretation. But whenever we suggested discussing democracy in the world arena, they were against it – there can be no democracy in the world arena. The Westerners have even canceled the very term “international law” that implied a respect for the principles of the UN Charter, primarily, the principle of the sovereign equality of states. Our Western colleagues did not give a damn (excuse me for this expression) about the sovereign equality of states or international law, generally speaking. They no longer use the latter term. They are saying now that all countries must follow the laws of a rules-based order. The rules mean only one thing – they are established by the West. Everyone else must obey. This is a typical example of autocracy and dictatorship that uses an ultimatum.
We don’t feel isolated. Isolation is a lot of those who couldn’t imagine their life without so-called “Western values” and without the welcoming embrace or at least a more or less warm reception in the West. Meanwhile, there are many more important things in life. They are a loadstar for the overwhelming majority of states and civilizations on this planet.
It is necessary to respect each other rather than impose one’s pseudo values in an aggressive manner. These have only existed for a short time. They appeared with the development of neo-liberalism and are used to discontinue millennia-old cultures and civilizations. This path is a dead end. These attempts will continue for a while, but they are doomed from a historical perspective. Strategically, this policy will find itself in complete isolation.
Question: I know Russia now has more important things to worry about, but “everyone is out for himself.” Now Serbia has to harmonize its foreign policy. It has not introduced sanctions against Russia. For us Russia is the most important foreign policy partner when it comes to upholding our sovereignty in international organizations. How do you visualize Serbia’s possible political prevarication between the two geopolitical poles, and does this phenomenon have time limits?
Sergey Lavrov: It’s not up to us to be responsible for decisions made by Serbia, the Serbian leadership, or the Serbian people. We are fraternal nations. We are united by common history and victories against common enemies. We feel how deeply these feelings are rooted in the soul of the Serbian people, in their historical memory. And now we are seeing this.
We never impose anything by force. The West is trying to impose on Serbia its own policy and interests by force of economic pressure, threats, blackmail, and ultimatums. It is telling Serbia that it must oppose Russia if it wants to join the EU. This is unseemly. This is not how one should behave in society, at home, with friends, or in the world arena. This is an example of their policy of arm-twisting. President Aleksandar Vucic has mentioned this more than once. He said honestly that Serbia is a small country but it has its own pride and its own interests. Attempts are being made now to simply forget these interests and turn you into an instrument of Western policy. This is what happened with North Macedonia and Montenegro. This is what the West is now trying to do with Bosnia and Herzegovina.
We have deep respect for the Serbian people, their commitment to its traditions, history, and its historical friends. I am convinced that the Serbian people will continue making wise decisions in any situation, based on their fundamental interests.
Question: Is President Vladimir Putin ready to sit down at the negotiating table with President Vladimir Zelensky?
Sergey Lavrov: President of Russia Vladimir Putin has commented on this topic many times. He raised this subject yet again not that long ago when answering questions by his foreign colleagues with whom he maintains regular dialogue, including on the situation in Ukraine.
Vladimir Putin said that he has never refused to meet with President Vladimir Zelensky. It is just that he believes in the importance of making sure that these meetings are well prepared. Considering the current crisis situation in Ukraine, its internal conflict which has been building up over all these years, and the multiple challenges, simply arranging a meeting to discuss what one thinks and what the other thinks does not cut it. In fact, it would be counterproductive. When Ukraine suggested talks after we launched our special military operation, we agreed. These talks carried on and are ongoing. They will resume today or tomorrow in person in Istanbul after a series of videoconferences. The outcome we seek must deliver on our principled objective of stopping the killing of civilians in Donbass which has been going on for eight long years. The Western community has remained silent despite all its progressivism and has not issued even a single comment to condemn what was going on, even though everyone saw the shelling of civilian infrastructure in Donbass: hospitals, kindergartens, clinics, and residential housing. Civilians were dying by the thousands. Still, the “enlightened” West remained silent. All it did was call for fulfilling the Minsk agreements. When Kiev refused, the West started saying that it was up to Russia to fulfill them. This is sheer mockery in terms of common sense, international law, human rights, you name it.
When negotiating with Ukraine, it is our duty to ensure that the people of Donbass never suffer from the Kiev regime again, while the West and NATO stop their military build-up in Ukraine, which creates physical, military threats to the Russian Federation. Ukraine must cease being subject to a constant militarisation effort and attempts to deploy strike capabilities there to threaten the Russian Federation. Ukraine must also stop encouraging neo-Nazi ideology and practices.
This has happened before, and we know these examples. In fact, they are rooted in Ukrainian law. Let me mention the discriminatory laws which run counter to the Ukrainian Constitution and all international commitments. These laws prohibit the Russian language in education and the media. Ukraine has recently adopted laws banning the Russian language from everyday life. Demilitarisation and denazification of Ukraine constitute an indispensable component of the agreements we are seeking to conclude. I hope that Ukraine understands that the developments which have been running rampant there since the country’s independence are extremely toxic. This includes honoring the memory of Shukhevich and Bandera, who were Nazi criminals. The “decommunization” drive includes demolishing monuments to the great people who liberated Ukraine from the Nazis. Western instructors helped train “nationalist” battalions whose members not only wore Nazi symbols but practiced Nazi methods of war. Seeing how Ukrainian Nazis from the Azov and Aidar battalions treat Russian prisoners of war should have dotted all the i’s and crossed all the t’s for you. We will need to arrange this meeting once a solution regarding all these key matters comes into reach.
For many years, we sought to raise awareness on these issues. The West remained impervious to our efforts, but they have heard us now. This is already something. What matters the most right now is to stop indulging the Ukrainians who want to use talks and solutions as a smokescreen. They have succeeded in this posture when they derailed the Minsk agreements immediately after signing them in February 2015. In the end, they said that they refused to fulfill them. We know how good they are at pretending to be involved. This time, they will not get away with it. We need to make sure that the talks yield results, and once they do, the Presidents will formalize them.
Question: I have a question about mercenaries in Ukraine. It is a hot subject in Russia, and it is being discussed around the world as well. Hundreds of people from Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina fought on the side of the Islamists in Syria. However, the West did not criticize Pristina or Sarajevo. These people are now willing to fight in Ukraine, and there are also Croatian volunteers there. The Kosovo Albanian authorities and Pristina have supported Kiev. We would like you to comment on this.
Sergey Lavrov: We were among those who for years warned our Western partners about the recruiters of the Islamic State and other terrorist groups working in several Balkan countries. We warned them about the consequences of such connivance for Europe. Statistics show that Pristina is holding the per capita anti-record by the number of militants fighting in Syria and Iraq. But nobody wanted to hear about that. Later our Western colleagues wondered where the cutthroats who staged terrorist attacks and massacres in European cities had come from. Mercenaries will not remain in Ukraine after their inglorious mission ends there. It is perfectly clear that they will move on to European cities, where they will continue their so-called work. You may know that participation in hostilities in foreign states is a punishable offense in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the Kosovo Province. Some of those who fought in Syria and Iraq have even been punished upon their return home. But today Europe is acting differently. The policy of double standards has taken priority when it comes to Ukraine. The West has banked on it to contain Russia. It would use any means to achieve this end.
We don’t see any reaction to this. We have been trying to draw the attention of our Western partners and colleagues from other countries and parts of the world to the Ukrainian embassies’ activities to recruit mercenaries for Ukraine on their websites, which is a blatant violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and is discrediting the status of a diplomatic office. Some of these mercenaries have made statements on social media and have appeared on several television networks. It is obvious that they are not volunteers. They are fighting for money. Therefore, they do not have the right to the status of combatant or prisoner of war under international humanitarian law. They are not entitled to protection.
As for Pristina’s support for Kiev, the matter is clear. Kosovo, which is a criminal self-proclaimed quasi-state, does not care for international law. It only wants to take advantage of the situation to win recognition for its pseudo-independence and is posing as just about the main ally of the United States and NATO in the Balkans.
Our attitude to this is well known. We warned about the inadmissibility of pandering to Pristina’s unacceptable actions, and we have always called for settling the Kosovo issue in strict compliance with UN Security Resolution 1244. When the UN General Assembly gave the European Union the mandate to facilitate dialogue between Pristina and Belgrade in 2010, this raised our hopes. In 2013, the EU convinced Pristina and Belgrade to sign an agreement on the Community of Serb Municipalities in Kosovo. It guaranteed the Serbs’ language and cultural rights, as well as their rights in local governments and their special relations with Serbia. However, the Community has not been established. When we remind our Western colleagues about this, they are embarrassed and say that “the matter is still on the table” and that efforts should continue to be taken to implement the decision. I believe that the EU has discredited itself as the guarantor of any agreements.
In February 2014, the EU guaranteed the agreement on a settlement in Ukraine between President Viktor Yanukovych and the opposition. When the opposition overturned the agreements the following morning, the EU said nothing and only cited certain democratic processes.
In 2015, France and Germany signed, together with us, a document that is known now as the Minsk agreements. During the subsequent years, Kiev did nothing to implement that document. It said openly that it would not do it.
[Prime Minister of Kosovo] Albin Kurti has said that he would not implement the agreements on the Community of Serb Municipalities in Kosovo.
The EU, which guaranteed the implementation of all of the above documents, has failed completely. I am sure that it will not do anything to force Pristina to implement the documents co-signed by Europe. The EU and the United States will not place any pressure on Pristina on the issue of mercenaries. The United States is feeling just fine. It used the situation to establish Camp Bondsteel, the largest military base in the Balkans. Pristina has not questioned the need to keep that base and has instead indicated its interest in keeping it. I believe that Pristina will be forgiven for anything it does and will be allowed to do anything it wants.
Question: The ultimate goal of your special operation is not quite clear. Originally it was stated as denazification and protection of the people of Donbass. Today, it seems, at least from abroad, that this is not the only goal being pursued by Russia. Many Russians cannot say what these goals are. Some of them are unable to agree with the rationale for this conflict.
Sergey Lavrov: Each person has the right to choose and define his or her position with regard to some or other events that take place in their own country or in other states.
As for our aims, they are certainly about removing the threats that over these long eight years have caused thousands of deaths and the destruction of civilian facilities in Ukraine – schools, hospitals, plants, factories, etc. This is what the Ukrainian regime has been doing against the population of Donbass with the West’s tacit approval. If today the West is suddenly concerned about the need to respect international humanitarian law and save people’s lives, I will only welcome it, but they should act in such a way as to see the causes and roots of the situation we are facing now.
The root cause of the matter is that an effort was launched to transform Ukraine into an anti-Russia immediately after its independence, its withdrawal from the USSR. You can see it for yourself if you look at the Kiev regime’s lawmaking: its laws in effect ban the use of the Russian language and encourage the development of openly Nazi organizations.
The Nazi ideology and practices have deep roots in Ukrainian society. Officers from the “national volunteer battalions” have permeated Ukraine’s army and armed forces; they publicly preach Nazi ideas, calling on others to follow the behests of Adolf Eichmann, a person notorious for his role in Europe during the Nazi rule. Even their symbols and tattoos reproduce the swastikas and emblems of the Nazi SS battalions. If we want to abide by European values, I do not think they can include this sort of ideology and practices. Europe must put an end to this, if it does not want to find itself once again in a situation where it will be inundated by this “wave,” be it brown or of any other color that the neoNazis favor.
The whole thing is much more serious than just solving a single problem. Russia cannot accept NATO’s plan to turn Ukraine into its outpost chock-full of offensive arms aimed at our territory. We cannot accept the West’s effort to encourage the eradication of all things Russian in Ukraine (language, culture, etc.). Where were our Western colleagues when Kiev banned the Russian media, TV channels, and not only printed matter but also books published in Russia? They shut down three Russian-language TV channels owned by Ukrainian citizens.
You have mentioned the fact that some Russian citizens cannot accept what is happening today and express their concern. But others – journalists, cultural figures, artists, and athletes – do not voice anything and just do their job. Ukraine puts hundreds of them on sanctions lists. Yesterday, the Ukrainian regime blacklisted another 46 Russian cultural figures, artists, athletes, and journalists. And everyone believes that this is normal. Being Russian in Europe today means running a tremendous risk of violence. There have already been such cases.
Our task is to ensure long-term security in Europe. This cannot be done without cutting off attempts to draw Ukraine into NATO, or without agreeing on security guarantees that will take into account the interests of Russia, Ukraine, and European countries. We were confident of this when we tried (unfortunately, to no avail) to start a serious conversation with the United States and NATO in 2021 about providing security guarantees, including for Ukraine, without expanding the North Atlantic Alliance. Nobody would listen.
We have heard repeated promises that NATO would not continue to expand. For example, when it came to the unification of Germany, then the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist. They just lied to our face. When we reminded them about those promises, they said they had never made any. Later on, when we presented proof, they said, well, there might have been some verbal agreement – meaning they just said things to “calm us down,” because they had more important concerns – to ensure that the Soviet Union would “shut down” without any “consequences” for Europe.
When they decided everything had “calmed down,” it was time to get moving. Now they are saying we “should not be afraid” because “NATO is a defensive alliance.” So it was when it was created. But they continued to explain, “NATO is protecting its territory.” We knew where their territory was when there was the Berlin Wall – both concrete and imaginary – between the North Atlantic Alliance and the Warsaw Pact. But when the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union ceased to exist, NATO suddenly thought it wanted to “protect the territory” further east. Then it moved a little more to the east, and so on. What kind of defensive alliance is it that draws its own line of defense? Moreover, it keeps adding countries that no one was ever going to attack – actually, no one had ever even thought of threatening these countries.
Jens Stoltenberg (the Norwegian Central Bank is unlikely to have him back any time soon, as the Alliance has extended his term) declares that NATO should take responsibility for global security. This is where the line of defense is, and where a democracy turns into autocracy and dictatorship. He says the alliance needs to increase its role in the vast Indo-Pacific region – that’s what they call the Asia-Pacific region, a direct allusion to the South China Sea. This is where their line of defense will be now.
We want NATO to return to sanity. We have reason to believe that Russia’s most serious concerns, having to do with our fundamental, legitimate interests, have finally been heard. They begin to understand now. If this is so, they will try to influence the Kiev regime, which listens to them, and in fact does everything the West tells them to. I hope that the Ukrainian negotiators will show a constructive approach, and at some stage, we will be able to achieve the desired result.
My colleague, UK Foreign Secretary Elizabeth Truss has actually confirmed with fantastic, amazing, naive frankness that those negotiators, like the Kiev regime itself, are not acting independently. She actually said they were assisting the Ukrainians in working out their negotiating position. Indeed, who knows the situation in our common region better than London? She went on to say they needed to continue to use the “hard lever” on Russia and “to double down on sanctions.” And when negotiations begin, the UK should be the country that will provide the necessary solutions. An amazing “revelation.” No need to comment.
I can see there are chances to reach an agreement. There is an understanding of the grossest mistakes our Western partners have been making for years. Although, for obvious reasons, they would hardly say this out loud.
Question: What do you think, wouldn’t Belgrade be a perfect place for the negotiations?
Sergey Lavrov: I believe Belgrade is a great city in terms of its position and status. It is quite suitable for talks at any level.
The venue for the negotiations must be acceptable to both teams. Three rounds of in-person talks were held in Belarus, followed by a break due to technical reasons. It was difficult to meet directly; therefore, we held several videoconferences. Now we have agreed to meet in Istanbul. It is a point on the map where both parties were able to arrive. We are ready to consider other locations, including Belgrade.
Question: These days Serbian people remember NATO bombings and many say that the reasoning President Vladimir Putin used to “attack” Ukraine is identical to the reasoning the alliance used in its aggression against Yugoslavia. What is your response to these claims?
Sergey Lavrov: Our Western colleagues are known for twisting facts without batting an eye or as much as a blush. They always want to justify their stance and demands by distorting the real picture.
We have already spoken about the February 2014 coup in Ukraine, when the settlement guarantees provided by the EU were trampled to pieces. The neo-Nazis who came to power immediately afterward demanded revoking the status of the Russian language in Ukraine, getting out of Crimea and sent combat units to Crimea to storm the Supreme Council. Only then did the Crimean people revolt against such attacks and held a referendum. Now, reviewing that period, the West starts its story, not with the failure of the European Union, whose signature, apparently, meant nothing to the opposition that staged the coup, and not with the attacks on the Russian language and Russians committed by the putschists that came to power. The West begins the timeline of those events with what it calls an “annexation” of Crimea. The truth is it was not an annexation but a free expression of will that took place as a result of the coup staged with support from the West. However, the West has crossed out those several weeks leading up to the referendum in Crimea, from history. They say Crimea was “annexed,” hence the sanctions, when in fact, they wanted to punish Russia for their own failures and inability to keep their promises.
For them, the timeline of everything that is happening in Ukraine right now begins on February 24, 2022, when Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the beginning of a special military operation. The years of abuse targeting Russians, the Russian language and culture in Ukraine, ignoring Russia’s appeals to NATO and the United States about the fact that further “exploration” of the territories bordering the Russian Federation is unacceptable, direct calls to prevent Ukraine’s accession to NATO and to stop pumping Ukraine with weapons, building naval bases and, as it now turns out, biological warfare laboratories – nobody is talking about that. They claim that Russia started the operation against the Ukrainian state for no reason at all. What about the fact that the Ukrainian state could not care less about the Minsk agreements for eight years, bombing cities, towns and killing civilians? All this is now behind the line from which the West now marks off its angry and principled positioning.
I heard that President Vladimir Zelensky gave an interview to several Russian media outlets and when asked about the biological warfare labs, he said it was all a lie and they did not exist. If the West is ready to buy into this kind of commentary it means that our own experience with modern Western politics will only be reaffirmed. There are multiple pages of documents that we submitted to the UN Security Council and President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky claims they are a lie.
I would like to remind you how the 1999 aggression came about. Today, no one remembers how the OSCE’s Kosovo Verification Mission, headed by US citizen William Walker, was used. Walker arrived in Racak, where several dozen dead bodies, mostly Albanians in civilian clothing, were discovered. Walker immediately declared this an act of genocide, although he had no authority to make such statements. Now that hundreds of ethnic Russians were subjected to obvious acts of genocide in Donbass for eight years, we are told that we have no right to describe the situation this way and that the UN Security Council should review it. Ukraine even appealed to the International Court of Justice claiming that Russia was misusing this term.
While heading the OSCE’s Kosovo Verification Mission, US citizen William Walker, after discovering these dead bodies in civilian clothing, declared an act of genocide based on his own judgment, rather than on behalf of any specific state. At the same time, his status as the Mission’s head gave him absolutely no authority to make such statements. Yet the Western countries used this illegitimate statement as a pretext for saying that their patience had run out, and they started bombing Belgrade. As you know, Joe Biden, then a US Senator, announced that he was demanding that air strikes be launched and that it was necessary to hit bridges across the Drina River. The attacks eventually commenced. Now everyone knows that a special board of inquiry had investigated the situation in Racak, and its members discovered that an overwhelming majority of those bodies belonged to militants from the Kosovo Liberation Army. They were killed in action and were later dressed in civilian clothing. But no one cares about this anymore because a pretext had been found in the same manner as Colin Powell produced a test tube allegedly containing a sample of Iraqi chemical weapons. Walker’s statement on the Racak incident also fits into this category.
They started bombing Belgrade. While attacking civilian facilities, members of the coalition provided no evidence that Serbian armed forces had occupied those civilian facilities. No, they simply bombed a bridge when a passenger train was crossing it. They bombed the television centre. When people were outraged and said that it was unacceptable to treat the media this way, they were told that those were not media outlets but, rather, an element of the Serbian propaganda machine used to boost the Serbian army’s morale.
In a similar twist several years ago, the French authorities refused to accredit RT and Sputnik at the Elysee Palace. When asked about their motives and this discrimination, they replied that these were Russian propaganda tools rather than media outlets. All these ploys and explanations have been available for quite a while, and they show only one thing: the West can do anything it wants. To be precise, the West thinks that it can do absolutely everything and that it can distort the facts as it sees fit, even if such distortions are diametrically opposite, depending on the situation.
Speaking of Belgrade, the West acted consistently while perpetrating bloodshed there and killing numerous civilians. The same is true of Iraq, where hundreds of thousands of civilians perished. Western ideologists and the masterminds of these aggressive wars later said that the establishment of democracy warranted and justified the war. Time magazine published a story with a headline implying that the airstrikes against Belgrade had made it possible to bring peace. This is how they described it. Everyone knows the duplicity of our Western colleagues very well. Nevertheless, we continued to suggest all these years that it was necessary to coordinate common security norms and rules for the entire OSCE region.
Thirteen years ago, we suggested signing the European Security Treaty for codifying toplevel political statements that no country should seek to strengthen its security at the expense of others’ security. They told us that NATO would not discuss this treaty because NATO alone can provide legally binding security guarantees. Everyone else should think about ways to protect and make themselves safe. Our colleagues displayed this openly autocratic approach as far back as 2009.
Question: We are all witnessing a brutal information war with all this fake news and rumors flying around. The Chief Directorate of Intelligence of the Ukrainian Defence Ministry has been spreading rumors alleging that President Vladimir Putin’s political leadership has antagonized Russian oligarchs prompting discussions among them on removing him from power. There were also rumors about his extreme isolation even though we all see how busy he is. Recently there were rumors regarding Defence Minister Sergey Shoigu’s health. You are one of the closest officials to President Vladimir Putin, and you have a good relationship with Defence Minister Sergey Shoigu. How would you respond to these allegations?
Sergey Lavrov: I cannot comment on the nonsense coming from both the Ukrainian secret services and the Russian neoliberals who are now abroad. It seems that their task consists of relaying the talking points they receive every morning. These are all blatant lies. Everyone is alive and well, and at work. You can see this on your television screens and on social media. The Government and the Presidential Executive Office are all working in the interests of our country and performing their duties.
Question: Today we do not see attempts at shuttle diplomacy or attempts of successful international mediation. Are we witnessing a failure of diplomacy?
Sergey Lavrov: We had all these years to engage in diplomacy. Let me remind you once again. In February 2014, the European Union acted as a guarantor when the Ukrainian President signed an agreement with the opposition. This was the pinnacle of diplomacy. However, the following morning the opposition trampled on diplomacy, and the European Union had to swallow it. What followed elevated diplomacy to new heights. It happened in February 2015, in Minsk, with the signing of agreements putting an end to the war in eastern Ukraine and paving the way to restoring Ukraine’s territorial integrity by granting special status to Donbass. This was more or less the same status as in the agreement creating the Community of Serb Municipalities in Kosovo. In both cases, the European Union was directly involved in achieving these diplomatic outcomes. In both cases, the EU proved its ineptitude to deliver on the agreements it reaches.
Give diplomacy a chance – this is what many are now saying. Of course, we want to give diplomacy a chance. It is for this reason that we agreed to hold talks which are about to resume in Istanbul. There are many other examples I can provide to demonstrate how our Western colleague’s unmade diplomatic achievements. They have lost out trust. I do not want to see any shuttle diplomacy on behalf of our Western colleagues. We had enough of it in February 2014 in Ukraine and in February 2015 in Minsk.
Question: The Politika newspaper has just devoted an issue yesterday to find an answer to the question of whether Nazism was defeated in 1945. Why is it that most of the European states do not understand the goal of what Russia is doing in Ukraine?
Sergey Lavrov: This is a philosophical question, and it is not for me to answer it. It is a fact that neo-Nazism resurfaced in Europe long before the current events. It is a fact that Latvia holds marches of Waffen-SS battalions every March with the government’s active support.
By the same token, monuments to those who defeated fascism are being destroyed in Ukraine and Poland, while in other EU countries monuments to Great Patriotic War and World War II heroes are being desecrated. Everyone knows about the erection of monuments to Bandera and Shukhevich in Ukraine, who was de facto on trial in Nuremberg. All this has been going on for many years.
I do hope that the European conscience will now awaken to these facts. It is in Ukraine that the trends of restoring Nazi ideology and practices have been especially apparent. They went beyond torch processions or marches as in the Baltic states and several other countries. They intentionally created neo-Nazi military units. There is documentary evidence, including photos and video footage. These neo-Nazis infiltrated the Ukrainian armed forces in order to climb up the command ranks. This is all well known.
I am certain that Europe must weigh our demands on preventing Nazism from gaining momentum in Ukraine. In any case, it is our neighbor, which means that this poses a direct threat to the Russian Federation. In fact, this is not about Europe, but the entire world. It is telling that when every year we submit a draft resolution to the UN General Assembly on preventing the glorification of Nazism, the EU in its entirety shies away from supporting it and abstains, while the United States and Ukraine have been voting against it for many years now. The United States argues that freedom of speech is enshrined in its laws. This says it all. No one cares that there was the Nuremberg Tribunal and its verdicts are binding.
Question (retranslated from English): Is there an official discussion currently underway about the Serbian authorities taking over the ownership of Russian companies? If the companies that are part of the Serbian oil industry remain under EU sanctions, will Russia cede the remaining share in those companies to Serbia? And if so, on what terms?
Sergey Lavrov: I am certain that this matter will be resolved. We have good relations. You know what role the Serbian oil industry plays in your country and how much this company contributes to the Serbian budget.
I strongly believe that we will find a solution based on agreements between our countries and companies. I have no doubt about that.