By Brett Wilkins

U.S. corporate media outlets are saturated with pundits – many of them ex-military or national security officials – who take to the airwaves to promote hawkish policies and actions in Ukraine and elsewhere without disclosing their own ties to the arms industry, according to a report published Tuesday.

Analyzing punditry across a range of outlets including CNNMSNBC, and NBC News, Aditi Ramaswami and Andrew Perez at The Lever found that the networks failed to inform viewers that many of their expert guests who called for supplying Ukraine with more weapons to defend against Russia’s invasion were currently employed by the weapons industry or its advocates.

“I think it’s awesome you can be a consultant for a company that manufactures certain missiles and go on NBC or CNN and say how important it is that we get more of those missiles shipped out, with no one saying [by the way], this guy works for the missile company,” Perez sardonically quipped in a tweet promoting the report.



The revolving door between the national security, private, and media sectors has become a prominent feature of the military-industrial complex. Perez and Ramaswami note that the media watchdog Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) found that 20 of the 22 featured American guests appearing on corporate networks’ Sunday politics programs in the wake of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan last year had ties to the arms industry or its boosters.

Unsurprisingly, many of these experts argued against ending the longest war in US history. Few, if any, disclosed their conflicts of interest.

“This type of revolving-door behavior should be prohibited for military officials to serve in a private capacity representing military contractors,” Craig Holman, the government affairs lobbyist at the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, told The Lever. “If not prohibited, it should be disclosed to everyone so when they’re going on television trying to affect [President Joe] Biden’s policy on whatever war they have in mind, they ought to be straightforward.”

However, as Perez and Ramaswami point out, “the Ukraine crisis and the potential for greater conflict have been a goldmine for defense contractors, sending stocks skyrocketing and prompting sharp increases in defense spending.”

FAIR editor Jim Naureckas told The Lever that “the people who have the most interest in influencing the direction of the coverage are weapons-makers. They have the most direct financial stake in the way we cover issues of war and peace. Unfortunately, they are interested in more war and less peace.”

Perez and Ramaswami write:

Since the start of the Ukraine crisis, US defense stocks in leading companies like Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and Lockheed Martin have surged, and they are expected to continue rising in the coming months. And in the wake of Russia’s invasion, President Biden signed into law a spending package that directs a record-breaking $782 billion towards defense – almost $30 billion above his initial request.

The bill signed by the president authorizes $6.5 billion in military aid for Eastern European countries, including $3.5 billion in new weapons for Ukraine. This is in addition to the $1 billion already spent on arming Ukrainian forces with weaponry such as Javelin anti-tank missiles made by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon’s Stinger surface-to-air missiles.

Various former US officials appearing on corporate media news programs have ties to these and other companies or groups representing their interests. Leon Panetta, a former defense secretary, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director, and White House chief of staff, regularly appears as a television guest expert. On CNN last week, he asserted that Russian President Vladimir Putin only understands “force” and that “the United States has to provide whatever weapons are necessary to the Ukrainians, so that they can hit back, and hit back now.”

Neither CNN nor Panetta disclosed that he is a senior counselor at Beacon Global Strategies, a defense industry consulting company whose clients have reportedly included Raytheon.

Another Beacon Global Strategies employee appearing regularly on network and cable news programs is former Pentagon and CIA Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash, who went on NBC‘s “Meet the Press” days after Putin’s invasion and called for arming Ukrainian forces so they could “shoot Russian aircraft out of the sky, open up those tanks with can openers, like the Javelins, and kill Russians.”

Beacon advisory board member and retired US Navy Adm. James Stavridis has frequently appeared on MSNBC, where he once said the solution in Ukraine is to “flood the zone” with ” troops, tanks, missile systems, warships, all the above, in order to send a signal to Vladimir Putin.”

“What we ought to do is give the Ukrainians the ability to create a no-fly zone,” he said. “More Stingers, more missiles that can go higher than Stingers.”

FAIR’s Naureckas told The Lever that “everyone involved is aware of the transaction that is going on. Journalists know this as well, but you can’t admit it because that would spoil the grift if you said, ‘Here’s a person who’s funded by the weapons industry to tell you about this crisis.’”

“It should be the reporter’s instinct to explain the agenda of the people they are quoting,” he added, “but because this is such an integral part of what is done in the journalism system, you can’t give away the game.”

Brett Wilkins is is staff writer for Common Dreams. Based in San Francisco, his work covers issues of social justice, human rights and war and peace. This originally appeared at CommonDreams and is reprinted with the author’s permission.

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

8 COMMENTS

  1. He forgot to mention Fox News. They’re the worst of the worst IMHO. They have a (retired?) “General” every day pushing for more weapons… and all the talking heads there agree with him.

    • Totally agree. The way Fox’s “retired generals” push wars or war$$$ is as if they have been told to use plain language for stupid people. These generals or more appropriately two bit lobbyists use a lingo that pretends to cut the bull and speak plainly hence a few years ago a fake report was published of a non existent study on PRWeb that claimed Fox News viewers have low IQs.
      But what remains is that when it comes to world affairs westerners take their crash courses of history and geography 101 on TV delivered through the scope of these military pundits with simple enough lingo that the orange buffoon allows himself the use of the term shithole countries to connect with his base.

    • @ NewtRallyt, Fox News is sickening to watch. It’s a Zionist propaganda outlet/toilet IMHO.
      How do I arrange to get notifications of replies on my comments? Do you know?

    • I don’t know how to get notifications of replies. I check back if I don’t forget and at times I forget. Maybe Gordon or Jim can answer.

      But on the subject of Zionist propaganda outlets, they all get their scripts from the same source which is the military branch and its web which includes Israel. You have to be able to stomach and watch all kinds of garbage to get a feel of where they are going with that garbage. As sick as it is, watching and reading the entire spectrum will give you a better idea of what’s going on.

  2. Flat Notes ! gotta hear about these underwater bunkers — amazing what the experts can build in a water shed and a water table 20 feet below the surface..

  3. Well a quick post on the above rancidly obvious, (never quite understood why the credentials of the writers are listed with their achievements are relevant)… a kind of freemasonry in script. After all Biden can claim to be president…and we all should be impressed.
    I am conversant with the adroit writer who interludes continuously with “no offence intended”..and the dvd were obviously kahzarians… but nobody has raised this….yet!…(permanent park bench comes to mind)
    Anyway back to the above..aaaaggggh yeah!
    Corporation profits from as whatshis name said…lol…
    ”the military industrial complex..blah blah…………he was right.
    I havent managed to ascertain the % of world GDP military and associated industries extract…obviously along with the medical/pharmaceutical thieves that have created cradle to death streaming money…lol…obviously aided by bits of metal at high velocity shredding the flesh space available.
    Kinda fills the mind with wtf…why are we digging this hole that is human termination.

    Resurrection is not an option!

  4. WELL AS LONG AS THE LEADER OF THE BAND NAMES THE SONGS IT IS SILLY TO COMPLAIN ABOUT NOTES THAT ARE FLAT

Comments are closed.