EXCLUSIVE: Witness Reveals Who’s to Blame for 2013 Ghouta Gas Attack in Syria


The chemical attack on Ghouta, Syria, took place in the early hours of August 21, 2013. The town was struck by rockets containing the chemical agent Sarin, killing innocent civilians. Iranian correspondent, Shemshadi Hassan, witnessed the attacks and spoke to Sputnik about the tragedy.

The Ghouta chemical attack left a death toll ranging from at least 281 people to 1,729. The attack was the deadliest use of chemical weapons since the Iran–Iraq War.

Darayya, a Damascus suburb

The witness of those events, the Iranian Radio and Television correspondent in Syria and Iraq, Shemshadi Hassan, spoke in an interview with Sputnik about who was responsible for the tragedy and what kind of information war surrounds the Ghouta attack.

“Even before the chemical weapons were used in Eastern Ghouta, a video appeared on the Internet showing how the terrorists were using gas to poison rabbits. Militants threatened that they would use this weapon to destroy the Syrian authorities, government’s army and people, all those who support Assad,” Hassan said.

He further said that after that video, there were reports that Saudi Arabia, near the borders of Syria and Jordan, has organized workspace for the production of special chemicals which are necessary to create chemical weapons, to be used by the terrorists.

“After all of that, we witnessed the use of chemical weapons in Khan al-Assal, an Aleppo suburb, where dozens of victims were innocent civilians. It is noteworthy that the media working for public relations of terrorists and financed by the US and its Western allies said that the chemical attack was carried out by the Syrian government’s army against its own citizens.”

“The Syrian government immediately denied this information and said that this was done by the terrorists. The government also demanded an immediate investigation into this terrible incident,” Hassan noted.

The official request of the Syrian authorities to carry out an investigation was reported to the UN Security Council, but surprisingly its examination was delayed by a year and only after that the UN Security Council decided to send its inspectors to Syria.

However, when the OPCW inspectors arrived in Damascus on August 21, 2013, the terrorists in the suburbs of Damascus in Eastern Ghouta once again used the chemical weapons and immediately blamed it on the Syrian Army.

“The Syrian authorities have repeatedly denied these false accusations. The government said that it was the handiwork of the terrorists, since there is no logic, sense and interest to use chemical weapons in such close proximity (5 km) to the location of OPCW inspectors and the United Nations,” Hassan stressed.

According to the correspondent, the results of the investigation and many of the facts were distorted.

“It turned out all wrong. It was not what the Syrian authorities and the Syrian people were hoping to achieve.”

Smoke billows after air strikes by regime forces on the town of Douma in the eastern Ghouta region, a rebel stronghold east of the capital Damascus, on December 13, 2015
Foreign Intelligence ‘Might Have Been Involved’ in Ghouta Gas Attack in Syria

Hassan further said, “Over these years, the terrorist’s sponsors and the media resources they control never reported that a few Western media following the chemical attack in Ghouta went to the terrorists in the suburbs of Damascus and talked with them.”

“The terrorists during the meeting admitted that it was they who carried out the chemical attacks in Eastern Ghouta and purposely accused the Syrian government’s army,” Hassan said.

“I would also like to point out that the United States, in turn, said that the use of chemical weapons in Syria is the alleged ‘red line.’ If it is broken, the US will directly attack the Syrian authorities. In fact, all these speculations have become a convenient excuse for the US to prepare what it was intending to do. Nevertheless, due to various reasons the US attacks did not take place.”

The correspondent further said that ultimately, the secret services of the West, particularly the United States, France and England, as well as Saudi Arabia and Israel, used these chemical attacks in pursuit of their own interests and goals.

“They tried to depict everything so that the blame fell on the Syrian authorities. Such a maneuver was needed in order to prepare the political and informational sphere for a direct military intervention,” Hassan explained.

Claims of Foreign Involvement at Ghouta Countered by Propaganda – Ex-CIA Officer

The correspondent further said that the fact that today the United States allegedly urges Russia and Iran to get involved in the process to provide existing documents and data is nothing other than another political ploy.

“In other words, it is a tactic of ‘psychological projection’ and ‘proactive action’ to convince the world that they allegedly did not know anything about what was happening and were not involved but are just trying to establish the ‘truth’ by finding the perpetrators of the incident,” according to Hassan.

“While the whole world knows that this was done at their hands, that they are sponsoring and helping terrorists, supplying them with weapons, including chemical weapons, which was applied and used against the civilian population and Syrian citizens,” the correspondent concluded.

According to the Human Rights Watch, the victims of the Ghouta attacks showed symptoms which are consistent with exposure to nerve gas, including suffocation; constricted, irregular, and infrequent breathing; involuntary muscle spasms; nausea; frothing at the mouth; fluid coming out of noses and eyes; convulsing; dizziness; blurred vision; and red and irritated eyes, and pin-point pupils.

This attack prompted Western countries to discuss issuing strikes on Syria. However at that time, due to the diplomatic efforts of Russia, foreign intervention was prevented and an agreement was reached with the Syrian government to destroy all the chemical arsenals.

In September 2013, Syria was acceded to the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, becoming a member of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW).

  • in reply to(Show commentHide comment)
    | Edit | Delete

    We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
    In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

    About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
    Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

    Comments are closed.