by Joseph Mercola – Originally published by The Epoch Times

Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder of Mercola.com. An osteopathic physician, best-selling author, and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health, his primary vision is to change the modern health paradigm by providing people with a valuable resource to help them take control of their health.

All links to Gospa News articles have been added aftermath for relevance to the topics covered


You’ll never guess how many have been killed or seriously injured in just the first year. Yet, the FDA and CDC keep pushing the shots, despite their own trial data showing they have no benefit in terms of reducing your risk of hospitalization or death.



  • According to a December 2021 survey of 2,840 Americans, between 217,330 and 332,608 people died from the COVID jabs in 2021.
  • Survey results also show that people who got the jab were more likely to know someone who experienced a health problem from COVID-19 infection, whereas those who knew someone who experienced a health problem after getting the jab were less likely to be jabbed.
  • Of the respondents, 34 percent knew one or more people who had experienced a significant health problem due to the COVID-19 illness, and 22 percent knew one or more people who had been injured by the shot.
  • Fifty-one percent of the survey respondents had been jabbed. Of those, 13 percent reported experiencing a “serious” health problem post-jab. Compare that to Pfizer’s six-month safety analysis, which claimed only 1.2 percent of trial participants experienced a serious adverse event.
  • In December 2022, Rasmussen Reports polled 1,000 Americans. In this poll, 34 percent reported experiencing minor side effects from the jab and seven percent reported major side effects.

COVID Boosters Trigger Metastasis. UK Oncologist and US Medical Doctor confirmed the Montagnier’s Warning


While it’s clear that the experimental COVID shots have killed a considerable number of people, the total death toll remains elusive, thanks to U.S. health agencies obfuscating, hiding, and manipulating data.

That said, the most recent survey1,2—published in the peer-reviewed journal BMC Infectious Diseases—puts the death toll from the COVID jabs somewhere between 217,330 and 332,608 in 2021 alone. As noted by Steve Kirsch:3

“[We’ve] killed at least 217,000 Americans and seriously injured 33 million … in just the first year, and the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] want to give you more shots … Since deaths from the vaccine were higher in 2022, most experts would estimate the all-cause mortality death toll from the COVID vaccines to be in the range of 500K to 600K.

“So the global cost of life from these vaccines is on the order of 10 to 12 million people … These [data] are consistent with the numbers I’ve been saying for a long time. It’s not a coincidence.”

Pfizer mRNA Vaccine: Risks of Pulmonary Embolism, Myocarditis, Blood Clots, Immune Thrombosis. Finally Released the FDA Surveillance Data

Survey: Why People Did or Did Not Get the Jab

Now, the slant of this paper is kind of interesting. The primary aim of it was to “identify the factors associated by American citizens with the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19.”

The author was curious about why 31 percent of the U.S. population had declined the jab or not completed the primary series by November 2022, nearly two years into a massively advertised “vaccination” campaign.

Breaking! Pentagon Rescinds COVID-Vaccine Mandate for All US Troops

Calculating the proportion of fatal events from the jab was secondary. As explained by the author, Mark Skidmore,4 Ph.D., an economics professor at Michigan State University:5

“A largely unexplored factor is the degree to which serious health problems arising from the COVID-19 illness or the COVID-19 vaccines among family and friends influences the decision to be vaccinated.

“Serious illness due to COVID-19 would make vaccination more likely; the perceived benefits of avoiding COVID-19 through inoculation would be higher.

“On the other hand, observing major health issues following COVID-19 inoculation within one’s social network would heighten the perceived risks of vaccination. Previous studies have not evaluated the degree to which experiences with the disease and vaccine injury influence vaccine status.

“The main aim of this online survey of COVID-19 health experiences is to investigate the degree to which the COVID-19 disease and COVID-19 vaccine adverse events among friends and family, whether perceived or real, influenced inoculation decisions. The second aim of this work is to estimate the total number of COVID-19 vaccine-induced fatalities nationwide from the survey.”

COVID: “STOP VACCINI mRNA! CAUSANO MIOCARDITI, DANNI IMMUNITARI E TUMORI”. Allarmante Studio dall’Istituto Superiore della Sanità

Here’s an excerpt describing the methodology:6

“An online survey of COVID-19 health experiences was conducted. Information was collected regarding reasons for and against COVID-19 inoculations, experiences with COVID-19 illness, and COVID-19 inoculations by survey respondents and their social circles. Logit regression analyses were carried out to identify factors influencing the likelihood of being vaccinated.”

Survey Findings

A total of 2,840 people completed the survey between Dec. 18 and Dec. 23, 2021. The mean age was 47, and the gender ratio was 51 percent women, 49 percent men. Just over half, 51 percent, had received one or more COVID jabs.

As Skidmore suspected, results showed that people who got the jab were more likely to know someone who experienced a health problem from COVID-19 infection, whereas those who knew someone who experienced a health problem after getting the jab were less likely to be jabbed.

Cleveland Clinic: “Higher Risk of COVID-19 Infection among Vaccinated”. Israeli Study on SARS-Breakthrough, Killer according to CDC Data

Of the respondents, 34 percent knew one or more people who had experienced a significant health problem due to the COVID-19 illness, and 22 percent knew one or more people who had been injured by the shot. So, as noted by to the author:7

“Knowing someone who reported serious health issues either from COVID-19 or from COVID-19 vaccination are important factors for the decision to get vaccinated.”

As for the types of side effects experienced by people within the respondents’ social circles, they included (but were not limited to) the “usual suspects,” such as:

  • Heart and cardiovascular problems.
  • Severe COVID infection or other respiratory illness.
  • Feeling generally unwell, weak, fatigued, and out of breath for weeks.
  • Blood clots and stroke.
  • Death.

Hundreds of Thousands Killed for No Reason

Based on these survey data, Skidmore estimates:

“… the total number of fatalities due to COVID-19 inoculation may be as high as 278,000 (95 percent CI 217,330-332,608) when fatalities that may have occurred regardless of inoculation are removed.”

Were COVID-19 an infection with an extremely high mortality rate, perhaps high rates of death from a vaccine would be acceptable. But COVID-19 has an exceptionally low mortality rate, on par with or lower than influenza, hence the risk associated with the COVID jabs ought to be equally low.

VACCINES & GRAPHENE – 1. Dangerous & Mysterious Nanoparticles inside mRNA Serum. “Toxicology NOT Thoroughly Investigated” Pfizer Wrote

The global cost of life from these vaccines is on the order of 10 to 12 million people. — Steve Kirsch

As it stands, the risks of the shots are very high, while Pfizer’s own trial data, with more than 40,000 participants, show they offer no benefit in terms of your risk of hospitalization and/or death. The absolute risk reduction is so minute as to be inconsequential.8

High Rates of Side Effects

The death toll from the jabs isn’t the only disturbing part of this paper, though. Skidmore’s findings also suggest side effects from the jab may be more common than previously suspected.

As mentioned, 51 percent of the respondents had been jabbed. Of those, 15 percent reported experiencing a new health problem post-jab and 13 percent deemed it “serious.” Compare that to Pfizer’s six-month safety analysis,9 which claimed only 1.2 percent of trial participants reported a serious adverse event.

Vital CDC DATA: “Serious Adverse Events by mRNA COVID Vaccines 5.5 Times Higher than All Others in the US since 2009”

Now, as suggested by Kirsch,10 “we need to discount that by a factor of two because people report less severe adverse events as adverse events.” Still, that means serious adverse events from the jab are five times higher than what Pfizer reported.

“This is why the FDA never does after-market surveys on the drugs it approves. Because reality hurts,” Kirsch writes.11 “It is the FDA that should have discovered this before Mark Skidmore. The FDA is asleep at the wheel and they just believe everything the drug companies tell them, hook, line, and sinker. This is a major miss. Why aren’t they doing surveys like this to see if the reality matches the study?”

More Side Effect Rate Comparisons

For additional comparison, here are the findings of several other investigations:

  • Rasmussen Reports12: In December 2022, Rasmussen Reports polled 1,000 Americans. In this poll—taken one year after Skidmore’s survey—34 percent reported experiencing minor side effects from the jab and seven percent reported major side effects.
  • CDC’s V-Safe data13: In October 2022, ICAN [Informed Consent Action Network] obtained the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s V-Safe data. This is a voluntary program to monitor adverse vaccine reactions. Of the 10.1 million COVID jab recipients who used the app, 7.7 percent had to seek medical care post-jab.
  • Kirsch-funded survey14: A June 2022 U.S. survey by the market research company Pollfish found that 16.3 percent of COVID jabbed respondents experienced an injury, and 9.7 percent required medical care.

The graphic below, which visually compares Skidmore’s findings to the findings of the Rasmussen, V-Safe, and Pollfish surveys, was created by InfoGame on Substack.15 As noted by InfoGame:

“Skidmore’s article serves as another sign that the rate of COVID-19 side effects is extremely high and that the COVID-19 vaccines are an unprecedently risky medical product.”

covid-19 vaccines side effects
(InfoGame)

Menstrual Irregularities Are Common Post-Jab

While we’re on the topic of reported side effects, several surveys have also focused on the frequency of abnormal menses in women who got the jab, which could be indicative of reproductive harm. For example:

A British survey published in early December 2021 found 20 percent of women experienced menstrual disturbances following their jab.16

A study published in Science Advances in mid-July 2022 found 66 percent of “fully vaccinated” postmenopausal women experienced abnormal breakthrough bleeding. In total, 42.1 percent reported heavier menstrual flow post-jab (this included women of all ages, as well as transgenders on hormone treatments).17

An Italian peer-reviewed study published in March 2022 found that “50-60 percent of reproductive-age women who received the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine reported menstrual cycle irregularities, regardless of the type of administered vaccine.” After the second dose, abnormal menses were reported by 60 percent to 70 percent.18

People in High Places Seek Retraction

Not surprisingly, people in high places are already trying to force a retraction of the paper. A special notice from the editor, dated just two days post-publication, states:

“Readers are alerted that the conclusions of this paper are subject to criticisms that are being considered by editors. Specifically, that the claims are unsubstantiated and that there are questions about the quality of the peer review.”

Serious Injuries and Deaths due to Vaccines’ Adverse Reactions: Italian Judge urged Rome Prosecutor to Investigate

As noted by Kirsch:19

“They are actively trying to get the paper retracted because it destroys the narrative. I’m certain they will succeed because journals are under intense pressure to censor any anti-narrative paper. The problem is that Mark’s survey was entirely consistent with my surveys.

“If they want to have the paper retracted they need to show us THEIR surveys. But of course, they don’t have any surveys because they are too afraid of the results.

“So they will use hand-waving arguments like “I don’t like the methodology” or some nonsense like that instead of gathering their own data. They will NEVER show us survey data that supports their narrative because it isn’t there.

Germany orders Russian Holocaust Survivor Institutionalized over Covid-19 shot

“That’s why there are no success anecdotes. NOBODY can give me the name of a U.S. geriatric practice where all-cause deaths plummeted after the vaccines rolled out. In every case, they went the wrong way. The narrative is unraveling at an accelerated pace but the medical community is still fighting the truth.”

 Joseph Mercola – Originally published by The Epoch Times – First published Feb. 07, 2023, on Mercola.com


Sources and References

1, 5, 6, 7 BMC Infectious Diseases 2023; 23 article number 51

2 Jean Marc Benoit MD Substack Jan. 24, 2023

3, 10, 11, 19 Steve Kirsch Substack Jan. 25, 2023

4 Michigan State University Mark Skidmore

8 Steve Kirsch Substack Jan. 24, 2023

9 NEJM Nov. 4, 2021; 385: 1761-1773

12 Rasmussen Reports Dec. 7, 2022

13 ICANdecide.org Oct. 3, 2022

14 SKirsch.com July 1, 2022

15 Infogame Substack Jan. 25, 2023

16 MedRxiv Dec. 6, 2021

17 Science Advances July 15, 2022; 8(28)

18 Open Med March 9, 2022; 17(1): 475-484

 

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

10 COMMENTS

  1. Creating fear via covert chemical incapacitant agents like styrene floating off-gassing agent methods, right up the alley, as 911 land grab and insurance scammers move-on. To the absurd morph and parlay of a jab. Replaying the Spanish Flu a century later; our. collective memory embedded to DNA thinned out of the bloodstream as grift takes over the air currents. Send in the balloons to test and monitor.

  2. No wars are and vaccines massacres will stop until Bankers are dealt with. Best to seize their ill-acquired assets and force them to share all the profits made from the money deposited in their banks by the account holders. And shared equally even if the account holder has 1 unit of money are millions. Bankers believe that God has created nonbankers to serve bankers and if the nonbanker tribes do not obey the bankers kill them along with their families.

  3. I might face problems from those who cause problems to those who are regarded as Holocaust Deniers. But sure the Bill Gates Gang must have killed tens of millions of human beings around the world it controls in just the last couple of years. When will it stop so that we can light an ever-going Megga Hollocaust Fire.

  4. All Lol.
    «Tedros writes at the end of his Briefing or Falsehood of the Pandemic https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020
    “This is not a just a public health crisis, it is crisis that will thouch every sector – so every sector and every individual must be involved in the fight.”
    Do you know how to read or is it not clear to you?
    Does it not seem to you hypocrites that between 2020 and 2022 under the guise of Covid they have touched every sector of the lives of billions of people? And that every individual has not fought the war between non-wax and pro-wax?
    Even more you hypocrites: why do you insist on this propaganda?
    I add.
    In Italy what Tedros writes came true with Conte and Draghi and Speranza minister of Death. In the USA you know better than I do who it came true with and what it entailed in terms of elections. You mean with the fascist Carisio and Konehead that I am crazy?
    These are ready to be packed for Nuremberg 2. Or is it me for the asylum?
    Respect for facts before opinions.

  5. Death by Covid-illness is the same event as influenca or head cold. But deaths by vaxes are menslaughter.

  6. How many americans were killed by the spread of the US/Israeli covert top secret bioweapon attack on IRAN in February 2020 that no vaccine or treatment could possibly prevent from spreading then or now?
    How many deaths from that super deadly too secret bioweapon attack that ran amuck throughout whole world are now being blamed on vaccines as cover up of truth?

Comments are closed.